1) Turns out Trump and/or his people specifically told Evan Corcoran not to search Trump’s *office* for classified documents and then tell the DOJ there weren’t any. That’s specific enough to be textbook felony obstruction of justice. But there’s a lot more to it than just that.
2) Keep in mind, while this is newly reported, it’s old news. This is the testimony that Jack Smith successfully fought to obtain from Corcoran months ago. It’s why the courts struck down attorney client privilege and ordered the testimony. So why is it coming out publicly now?
3) The media doesn’t obtain this information by magic. It comes from someone involved with the process who actually knows these details, and decides to give them to the media for some specific strategic reason. And only a very small handful of people would know this information.
4) Corcoran would know. He could be the media’s source. But cooperators like Corcoran don’t usually yap to the media, because they’re already on the prosecutor’s good side, and yapping to the media could piss the prosecutors off.
5) Whoever in Trump’s camp told Corcoran not to search the office could also theoretically be the source. But no one leaks to the media about how guilty they are. If this were coming from that person, the leak would be about how innocent they are.
6) Prosecutors, even quiet ones, often strategically leak certain details near the very end.
One reason is to let someone know they’re nailed and that they’d better cooperate – which this could easily be.
7) But even without knowing who’s now giving this to the media, keep in mind that Corcoran already gave this same testimony to the grand jury months ago. This case is over.
These kinds of leaks after the fact are a sign of last minute positioning before indictments happen.
1) I said all along that if Bedminster ended up being part of the story, it would turn out Jack Smith was all over of from the start. Sure enough, Smith long ago obtained an incriminating recording of a conversation that Trump had at Bedminster, and partly built his case on it.
2) This is why all the simplistic chants of “search Bedminster” were so silly and pointless. As if Jack Smith wasn’t aware that Trump had a secondary residence and forgot to investigate there.
3) As it turns out, simply searching Bedminster would NOT have produced this audio recording. Instead that was the result of Smith *interrogating* everyone and piecing the timeline together and finding out who had what secret evidence where, and obtaining it from them.
Joe Manchin is an asshole but he votes with us 70% of the time. If he loses in 2024, Republican candidate Jim Justice will vote against us 100% of the time. That race will be a toss up. Absurd as it seems now, we may all end up wishing we’d held our noses and donated to Manchin.
This is not in any way a defense of Manchin. I hate the guy. But the point is, you take allies where you can get them. And as a sad statement of fact, we will never get a better Senator out of West Virginia than Manchin. Any other Democrat unelectable. Any Republican far worse.
Because Arizona is a swing state, we can replace asshole Sinema with real Democrat Ruben Gallego.
But West Virginia is a deep red state where a “real” Democrat can’t win. It’s either asshole Manchin voting with us 70% of the time, or a Republican voting with us 0% of the time.
Merrick Garland and his DOJ just brought a civil case against Jim Justice, even though he’s a declared candidate for Senate in 2024.
The notion that Garland’s DOJ will somehow let Trump slide, just because he’s a 2024 candidate, is laugh out loud silly. Trump is going down.
Jim Justice is already claiming he’s being targeted for political persecution. He’s full of it. But the DOJ knew he would make this claim, and it brought this solid case against him anyway. The DOJ doesn’t care about these kinds of optics one way or the other.
The only thing the DOJ tries to do, as a matter of policy, is that if it’s going after a political candidate for legal violations, it tries to do it early enough that it’s settled one way or the other before the election cycle gets particularly serious.
Ken Paxton’s words don’t magically make the 2024 Senate race Texas competitive. Even if what he’s saying is accurate, the replacement AG will pull the exact same voter suppression in 2024.
There are NINE more competitive Senate races than Texas in 2024. Pick one. Get involved.
Look, I get the attraction of the Texas Senate race. You get to feel outrage toward Ted Cruz. And since you can’t win anyway, you don’t have to put in any real work. Then when Cruz wins, you get to feel even more outrage.
But that’s not political activism. More like psychosis.
“But so many pundits on TV and Twitter are hyping that Texas Senate race!”
Yes. They know it’s an emotional hot button for you, so they’re pretending it’ll be competitive in order to manipulate you into giving them ratings and retweets.
As I predicted yesterday, a number of progressive House Democrats now say they’re voting against the budget bill. This means it’s going to pass with a TON of votes to spare, and House Democratic leaders has given progressives their blessing to vote this way. It’s not a story.
If House progressives had to vote for it in order to pass it, they would.
But since their votes aren’t needed on this one, it’s better to let them vote against it, because that plays well in their far left districts.
By the way, Biden benefits from this. It allows him to be seen as not as far left as some members of his own party, which helps him appeal to moderate voters in 2024.
If you care about the Senate majority in 2024 you’ll focus your efforts on actually competitive races like Ohio, Arizona, Montana, Nevada. These close races WILL decide the majority.
Not extreme long shots like Texas, which you have no business focusing on unless you live there.