“[T]he explicit guarantee extended to the globally systemic banks is now extended to everyone,” said Renita Marcellin (@aphisha28)of @realBankRefrom. “We have this implicit guarantee for everyone, but not the rules and regulations that should be paired with [them].” 2/14
What do we need? How about a stable banking system, “essential services—such as deposits, money transfers, and credit—on a universal basis,” and “a strong role for regulatory agencies that protect consumers from abusive practices.” 3/14
When @TheStalwart says that the #BankCrisis of ‘23 means this notion “feels more mainstream because of this tension between private profit in banking and the utility function that everyone expects.” Yes. 4/14
@POTUS Biden should “lean harder into the politics of cracking down on finance.” It’s popular. Witness the public approval of the administration’s fight against junk fees. 5/14
Biden should also advocate for breaking up the biggest banks. “Even if good legislation is doomed, a sustained fight will put critics of #WallStreet on the right side of the issue in advance of 2024, and on the right side of American history.” 6/14
Congress rejected a new Glass-Steagall or capping bank size when it passed Dodd-Frank in 2010. If we’d done it then, we could have avoided the purchase of First Republic by @jpmorgan, which made the biggest bank even bigger. 7/14
Minneapolis Fed prez @neelkashkari is an advocate for breaking up big banks AND raising capital levels to make banks more stable: “Having significantly higher levels of capital is our only chance to build real resilience in our financial system.” 8/14 minneapolisfed.org/article/2023/d…
@BMillRep, a former House member, once called the 2008 financial crisis “an extinction-level event” for Black wealth. “A more stable system is a sine qua non for starting to close the racial wealth gap.” 9/14
Biden should also champion public banking – the idea that the government should provide basic financial services through the post office or another public entity. Here’s a brand-new report on that: 10/14 ourfinancialsecurity.org/2023/05/news-r…
Tougher supervision of banks is not sufficient, but urgently needed. @federalreserve Vice Chair Michael Barr has promised to crack down. “A bolder step would involve stripping supervision and regulatory authority from the Fed.” cc:@Aarondklein 11/14
#WallStreet and predatory lenders have had @CFPB in their sights for over a decade, and the right-wing Supreme Court might give it to them. An agency that delivered $16 billion in relief to real people is worth fighting for. 12/14
When the gov intervened with #SVB, it saved the deposits of very wealthy people and companies. Outrageous. But: “Blaming deposit insurance itself, however much the rescue of SVB depositors sticks in the craw, would be precisely the wrong reaction to this year’s crisis.” 13/14
Deposit insurance has a great, progressive history. Read that and more in the full article 14/end
GREAT SCOOPS: Last weekend, Federal Reserve Chair Powell sought to DOWNPLAY role of failed regulation/supervision -- partly by the Fed! -- in collapse of #SiliconValleyBank
"the Biden administration pushed to formally spotlight shortcomings in financial regulation that they blamed for the banks’ rapid descent to insolvency." But Powell "blocked efforts to include a phrase mentioning regulatory failures" 2/12 nytimes.com/2023/03/16/bus…
As @ddayen points out, that statement was pretty anodyne, and included praise for (unnamed) Dodd-Frank law of 2010 but no mention of the 2018 partial rollback that eased oversight of SVB 3/12 federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pre…
Thanks to the #BankLobbyistAct back in 2019, and the Trump-era Fed's further deregulation, the Fed took its eyes off large banks like SVB. AFR fought against that tooth and nail. 2/6
The government moved decisively to avoid a panic by guaranteeing deposits. Banks that benefit from that now need tougher supervision. AFR's Renita Marcellin told the NYT ... 3/6
The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank have something in common: they both benefited from deregulation under the #BankLobbyistAct in 2018 1/5
Congress passed the law but the Trump-era regulators pushed it even further, giving authorities less oversight of these large-ish banks. Now we need action to reverse those changes and make others 2/5 ourfinancialsecurity.org/2023/03/news-r…
The subprime corporate credit market, which includes private equity’s fave, leveraged lending and CLOs, has hit $5 trillion in the US.
This problem portends bring slower growth, job losses, and possibly instability in parts of the financial sector.
🧵1/10
This lending seldom goes to productive uses, relies on sketchy accounting, and is often very opaque.
It's often to finance private equity buyouts refinance existing debt, or suck cash out of companies.
And it supports monopoly power, by driving corporate consolidation. 2/10
The odds of a 2008-style crisis are low but the risks of damage are high.
This debt has – a redistribution of money towards Wall Street – has left companies and workers in a worse position to handle a slowing U.S. economy. 3/10
Politico's @vtg2 has a brilliant scoop that underscores why we need Saule Omarova as head of the OCC 🧵 1/7 politico.com/news/2021/10/2…
Here we learn that the last Trump OCC boss, @BrianBrooksUS gave a secret legal imprimatur to allowing banks to hold cryptocurrency -- a wild-west asset if there ever was one -- under certain circumstances. 2/7
On on level, it's garden-variety Trump-era corruption. Brooks was chief legal officer @coinbase before becoming Acting Comptroller, and after he left, he was CEO of @binance for 3 months (Why the short tenure?) 3/7
Today, we will be clipping videos from the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs committee hearing on “How Private Equity Landlords are Changing the Housing Market.”
@SherrodBrown opens: "in plain English, that meant take advantage of the foreclosure crisis... to give Wall Street billionaires the chance to buy up homes for less than they're worth and rent them out at a steep profit."
@SherrodBrown "It's a variation on the same theme no matter the industry.... PE profits depend on squeezing every last nickel from workers and renters, without any kind of real investment in their employees or their communities."