Foia news. This concerns the Twitter Files. 1/ On the basis of this email from Elvis Chan concerning expedited pre-election security clearances for social media employees, I filed the attached foia request with the FBI.
2/ The FBI originally agreed to expedite it on the basis of extraordinary press interest in a matter that impacts upon public perception of the integrity of government.
3/ However, despite understanding the foia request well enough to expedite it on extraordinary grounds, the FBI denied the foia request because it wasn’t specific enough for them to understand. Huh? So I appealed to DOJ. Now DOJ is denying upon the grounds of “personal privacy”.
4/ You know, personal privacy is very important to the Feds. Sometimes.
Smirnov was apparently spying for the United States against Russia, and they are burning him publicly by making detailed recitations of his spying. Super-classified stuff we NEVER get to see. It’s incredible to watch. Why? storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Compare all of this fresh detailed spycraft information on Smirnov, thrown right out into the public, with the totally-redacted withheld and delayed CRAP that we get in response to foia and Congressional inquiries into Spygate and other swampy scandals. Night and day! 😤🤬🤯
Danchenko jawboned with a few drinking buddies to generate false stories & the Feds do everything to coddle & protect him. Horowitz didn’t even dox him or his “sources” or reveal his paid CHS status (😉). Smirnov spies on real oligarch yachts & they finger him in public!!!
1/ Allow me to explain. Kamala checked all the boxes and was okay’d by BIG DEM. Elias was on her 2020 campaign staff. She wasn’t popular OR ready, so they cheated Bernie out of Iowa again & put up Biden with the idea he’d retire when Kamala was ready. But she never got ready.
2/ Kamala still isn’t ready and can’t win squat. The Dems did well in the midterms, so Dr Jill told Joe that means he can stay. The powerbrokers didn’t agree. The DNC parted with Elias, but not the DCCC. The battle line was over ditching Joe.
3/ So Hunter stuff started coming out, just as it did in 2015 when they were pushing Joe not to challenge Hillary. And push-polls showing Joe losing to Trump. But Newsom blew his RDS debate, Oct 7th happened, and Kamala remained unready even for a one year presidency.
Woah! 🚨🚨🚨Ray Epps sentencing memorandum filed today. The Feds are treating the “conspiracy theories” against Epps as grounds for a reduced sentence. Hmmm. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
@julie_kelly2 directed my attention to the overuse of the term “agent”. They say Epps wasn’t an “agent”. They don’t say he wasn’t a CHS, though. Is that by design? They also quote his Congressional testimony (which are public), but not his FBI interviews (which are hidden). Hmm.
@julie_kelly2 Woah! 🚨🚨🚨
Ray Epps put in his own sentencing memo including these FBI materials. They initially didn’t want to prosecute him at all. 🤷🏻 h/t @walkafyre storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
/1 The first time I smelled a rat with the CDC promoting vaxing the naturally immune, and responded with a foia request, was in the Summer of 2021 (when I was offline). They answered quickly with a “don’t know”, but they cited three studies they claimed supported their position.
2/ Of course vaxing immune people would cause a spike in antibodies. Same as injecting them with the live virus. Same with injecting immune people with the measles vax. Doesn’t mean it’s healthy or smart. But I noticed another problem.
3/ The three studies CDC cited showed a spike in antibodies after only one dose of the vax in an immune person. The studies didn’t support giving a 2nd dose even for the ridiculous and unnecessary purpose of spiking antibodies. So I filed a 2nd foia on THAT topic.
So this regards the same CDC “study” from which they publicly concluded that the naturally immune needed to be vaxed and that “everyone” needed vaxes as soon as possible. I asked for the actual data.
And.
This.
Is.
What.
They.
Said.
1/ The Court’s holding on the value of Mar-a-Lago cited to & relied upon a printout of Palm Beach County’s tax assessments of its total market value. Doc. No. 905. That exhibit, however, LACKS this important pop up disclaimer from the County’s website. pbcgov.org/papa/Asps/Prop…
2/ The record is too lengthy for me to see whether Trump’s side objected to the admissibility or reliability of the tax appraisal. But it’s not addressed in the rebuttal report of Trump’s expert.
3/ The Court regarded the proffered valuation opinions of Trump’s expert as inadmissible as inadequately supported “net” opinion. I read the opinion evidence and don’t wholly disagree. I certainly would have challenged its admissibility. The expert could have done much better.