Foia news. This concerns the Twitter Files.
1/ On the basis of this email from Elvis Chan concerning expedited pre-election security clearances for social media employees, I filed the attached foia request with the FBI. ImageImage
2/ The FBI originally agreed to expedite it on the basis of extraordinary press interest in a matter that impacts upon public perception of the integrity of government. Image
3/ However, despite understanding the foia request well enough to expedite it on extraordinary grounds, the FBI denied the foia request because it wasn’t specific enough for them to understand. Huh? So I appealed to DOJ. Now DOJ is denying upon the grounds of “personal privacy”. Image
4/ You know, personal privacy is very important to the Feds. Sometimes.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with JewishFoiaFan🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱

JewishFoiaFan🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @15poundstogo

Sep 5
1/ Epstein files. Geeeettt your Epstein files, here. All free, free, free!!! But only for people who want to actually read them. Which excludes Massie and his fellow lying Democrats.
vicourts.org/workspaces/One…
2/ More free Epstein Files!!! Thousands of pages. Transcripts, emails. Massie hasn’t read any of them and doesn’t give a crap about the actual facts. courtlistener.com/docket/6589417…
3/ Freeeeee Epstein files. Come and get ‘em. Free free free. Massie doesn’t read them, nor his Democrat friends, but YOU can, if you really want to. courtlistener.com/docket/1731837…
Read 7 tweets
Sep 4
Short thread 🧵 on Massie’s proposed Epstein bill:
1/ If I’m reading this stuff correctly, Massie’s discharge petition concerns a proposed amendment substituting 4-5 pages of Epstein-related disclosure requirements for 192 pages of a bill, HR 185, which covers all sorts of things having nothing to do with Epstein. I have no idea whether the original version of HR 185 is any good, totally sucks, or is a mixed bag of compromises and deals. But it’s complicated enough that it was referred to 23 committees (which presumably are each Republican-controlled).
/2 Here is a link to Massie’s proposed amendment. Note the substitute and strike language highlighted in the image below. congress.gov/119/bills/hres…Image
/3 Here is a link to the full 193 pages of HR 185. (Zzzz). Note the 23 committees listed and the enactment clause in the image below. Massie’s proposed amendment would substitute 4 pages of Epstein disclosure requirements for all 192 pages of HR 185 after the enactment clause, thereby circumventing 23 committees’ work on dozens of issues (for better or worse). congress.gov/119/bills/hr18…Image
Read 5 tweets
May 4
This is a LIE. It’s not opinion. It is not debatable. The bill is a MINOR amendment to the anti-boycott statute that has been on the books since 2018, and which contains absolutely no language even remotely similar to what Charlie Kirk describes here. I couldn’t care less whether people support the amendment or the existing statute. It’s not the least bit important. If you READ THE BILL (attached) you’d say, who cares? But the DISHONEST anti-Israel engagement farming is motivated by something very, very dark. Something that might make you go to Hell when you die. Disgusting and evil. Vote against the bill if you want and repeal the 2018 Anti-Boycott Act if you don’t lime it. But don’t LIE just because engagement farming against the JOOS will yield you 15 dollars. Disgusting!!! 🤢
Here is the amendment: Image
Image
Here is the legislative history of the 2018 statute. congress.gov/bill/115th-con…
Read 5 tweets
Nov 17, 2024
1/ I promised a thread, with receipts, on why I regard the Durham report and investigation as minimalist shams. I never got to it because of (i) life, and (ii) other more pressing and timely matters. But now that Trump is staffing up, and now that there may be an opportunity to expose more of the abuses that our government has strained to cover up, this subject has become more pressing and timely. I’m still busy, but can deal with that by drafting this thread in parts over time and trying to keep it brief and focused (and full of typos).
2/ I concede that Durham’s prosecutions and report did result in revealing a lot of important evidence. But, as with Robocop’s Secret Directive Four (Google it if you don’t know), there were lines he would not cross, at least not beyond the bare minimum. One of those Durham reveals in footnote 8 of his report and the (terse) accompanying text. Specifically, Durham was delegated certain authority by the AG to “use classified information” BUT Durham “has not used this authority.” 🤯Image
3/ I don’t have a copy of AG Order 4942-2020 in which the AG delegated this (UNUSED 🤯) authority to Durham. If anyone does, please share and I will update this post. I’ll wait a while before continuing this thread in the hope someone can provide a copy of Order 4942.
In the meantime, here is a copy of the underlying order showing what authority the AG had to delegate on the use of classified information.
See here: trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-a…Image
Read 39 tweets
Jun 10, 2024
The FBI foia vault today released additional evidence of .@JakeSullivan46 using personal emails for top secret matters and his failure to help prevent Ambassador Stevens’s murder in Benghazi despite actual knowledge of the danger posed to him.
vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-cli…

Image
Image
Jake may have sent but just in case. Benghazi/Stevens/Hillary. Image
Read 4 tweets
Jun 2, 2024
The US State Dept’s foia website posted 1249 documents on Friday. Let’s take a quick look 👀. foia.state.gov/Search/Results…
One foia request (not mine) ending in 07153 yields some interesting stuff on Russia/Ukraine. Including Director of Policy planning David McKean’s wife apparently invested with Rosement (Seneca?!?), and Kathy Kavalec enjoying Atlantic Council anti-Russia emails just before the 2016 election. foia.state.gov/Search/Results…Image
Image
Image
“NIH” gets 13 hits, including these doozies on Covid origins. foia.state.gov/Search/Results…

Image
Image
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(