While it would be good to remove the bad amendment to Art 368 and make it in line with Art 111 where Hon'ble President can send back bill to amend constitution to the Parliament for reconsideration the #SengolAtNewParliament does give more power to act under Art 86(2)
With #SengolAtNewParliament representing Rama Rajya pious purpose Constituent Assembly Rama Rajya guarantee and merger promise to Shri Rama Raja Orchha Deity the Hon'ble President can act under Art 86(2) while Bill under consideration and ask for Pandit Nehru yardstick be applied
The #SengolAtNewParliament enables Hon'ble President to act under Art 86(2) and fulfill Art 60 Oath obligation by ensuring Constitutional Rama Rajya yardstick is applied by Parliament while Constitution amendment Bill is still u consideration in Parliament
Thus #SengolAtNewParliament actually empowers the Hon'ble President to refer any action that needs to be done which Hon'ble President thinks violates Art 60 Oath and Constituent Assembly Rama Rajya guarantee and same can be referred to Parliament Art 86(2)
Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute was discussed in Parliament but what happens if wrong opinion is given on reference of Hon'ble President to Ministry by Officials ?
Art 86(2) does provide option for Hon'ble President to refer to Parliament
Hon'ble President could not send Art 143 ref due to wrong opinion of officials on Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute thus violating Art 60 Oath..with #SengolAtNewParliament it opens door to refer matter to Parliament under Art 86(2) to verify Art 363 bar violation by SC
Thus any future Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute which arises when Constituent Assembly Rama Rajya guarantee is violated by SC can be referred by Hon'ble President using Art 86(2) powers to Parliament with Sengol installed to comply with Art 60
Whether on Constitution amendment Bill or Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute which arises because of violation of Rama Rajya guarantee ..the Hon'ble President while exercising Art 86(2) power by following the precedent laid down by Dr Kalam of consulting Hon'ble former CJI
Thus effect of #SengolAtNewParliament is really positive for the Nation as Hon'ble President can exercise Art 86(2) power and ensure compliance with Constituent Assembly Rama Rajya guarantee that Sengol represents as violation of which is bad for Nation
In👇thread we explain how April 18th 2019 Sabarimala genuine promise blocked by officials 90% fulfilled by Shri Rama Om Vashat Karaya Namaha 🙏 Himself...the defined promise for devout politicians for rest 10% work is same as Art 84(A) Constitutional Oath
Unfulfilled 10% Sabarimala promise is spirit of above Art 84 (A) Oath for all devout politicians across political spectrum who belong to Shri Rama Parivar Art 26 धार्मिक सम्प्रदाय (Hindi version of Constitution) Ramayana defn "राज्यं च वयं च रामस्य धर्मं वक्तुमिहार्हसि"
"If elected by grace of Shri Rama I will preserve protect and defend Shri Rama Embodiment of Dharma definition of Constitutional Morality (Dharma) and ensure Sabarimala is reheard and correct Hon'ble SC Judges definition"
It is only through true faith and allegiance to Constitutional Morality (Dharma) definition of Shri Rama Embodiment of Dharma as against wrong definition in SC ZERO Deity Rights judgement that Sovereignty and Integrity of Bharat can be secured
We have always wondered what is the significance of July 18th in the draft notification to resolve Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute...
Indian Independence Act came into force on July 18th 1947 and it is now clear the SC violated legal limit
Eka Shila Shri Chilkur Balaji SreeDevi Bhoomi Devi Swamyambhu Deity represents the natural Rama Rajya Sovereignty of Dharma right of this ancient sacred land worshipped in the form of Bhoomi Devi Deity and recognized as 👆 legal limit to Constituent Power of law making
Shri Thanthri Padmanabha Swamy temple explains the connection between Thrippadidanam and above legal limit to Constituent power of law making
Post Jan 22 2024 Constitutional Pranaprathishta
Shri Ramlala Sarkar Art 26 & Art 363 Deity rights legal limit to Constituent Power of law making protects
Sabarimala Deity Right to be Worshipped inclusive of Devotees' Group Right to perform duty of worship & please Deity
HH Saantananda Maharshi Swamiji historic letter connects April 18th 2019 Sabarimala promise of Hon'ble PM Shri @narendramodi ji and Jan 22 2024 Constitutional Pranaprathisha which fulfills it by grace of Guru even though wrong official opinion blocked it.
How Shri Rama Raja Deity of Orchha revealed Himself as Ruler u Art 363 (2)(b) when historic Digvijay yatra of Swamiji referred to in the above letter which started from Ayodhya turned back towards Ayodhya
Bharat : India 2.0 Art 26 interpretation (we hope to get SC to follow through Order 27A Rule 1) that protects Rama Rajya natural right of Bhumi Devi has been secured through devotion of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal (SC) community to which Milind Makwana belongs americankahani.com/perspectives/i…
"Our neighbors included a priest& Vedic astrologer. While both were members of what some would deem India’s “upper” or “dominant” castes, we were all in same socio-economic boat We didn’t think of them as superior nor did they think of us as inferior" Thank you for speaking truth twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
We are proud of devotion of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community without which Bharat would have lost Art 26 Rama Rajya protected in Deity Rights and we hope the Govt will respond to our request to honor Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community through Bharat Ratna for Hon'ble former President
Having installed Sengol in Parliament let us work to make it erect for well-being of our Nation by correcting the wrong Sabarimala interpretation that Deity is not a person u Part III which is in violation of Rama Rajya pious purpose that Sengol represents
"Shri Parameshwarji Eklingji Maharaj is the Sovereign of Mewar, and Shriji as His sole representative shall exercise on His behalf all rights, authority & jurisdiction." From Mewar Constitution
Sovereignty of Dharma basic structure of Bharat Constitution
"Dharma, righteousness, is king of kings Dharmam Kshatrasya Kshatram It is ruler of both people & the Rulers themselves It is sovereignty of the law which we have asserted" Dr Radhakrishnan defining Bharat's Objectives resolution when we comp with Pakistan 👆
Shri Chilkur Balaji Deity Koorma Form July 18th SC Judgement quotation part of Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute
"In adharma flowing frm wrong decision in a Court of law, one fourth each is attributed to the person committing the adharma, witness, the judges& the ruler"
The #SengolAtParliament reminds us of the practical truth of above statement from the story of Kannagi
The Hon'ble President and Hon'ble MPs who constitute Parliament cannot thus be powerless when Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute is raised to correct through Art 143 ref
Sengol in Parliament does bend when SC violates dharma by infringing on Rama Rajya pious purpose protected in Shri Rama Raja Deity Rights in our Constitutional Rama Rajya and when Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute arises duty of Hon'ble President & Hon'ble MPs to correct