We spoke to @NationalWorld about what we think a compassionate, accessible and workable asylum system could look like – and why an approach based on hostility and deterrence is cruel, costly, and won’t stop refugees risking their lives to reach the UK to claim asylum.
Our policy and research manager @_tarapovey told @ImogenHowse that a compassionate system is one where people are believed, welcomed, and treated with dignity - and are able to start rebuilding their lives.
An accessible system is one where people can claim asylum without putting their lives at risk by crossing the Channel. It is completely legal to come to the UK to seek asylum so we have a moral and lawful duty to make it possible.
A workable system is one in which decisions on claims are made quickly and fairly, where people have access to information and legal support, and where people await decisions in safe and appropriate environments.
Here's how we reached the figure of £300 million. 🧮
It's based on national insurance and income tax contributions if half of the 69,593 working-age people waiting more than six months for a decision on their asylum claim found work.
Once able to support themselves, people would no longer need asylum support payments from the government.
So we added that saving onto the final amount as well. The grand total was £308,472,107.
After weeks of dither and delay the Gov's plan to protect people fleeing the war in Ukraine fails to match the need of the moment and the compassion of the public.
In fact, it's a massive downgrade from the UK’s previous support for refugees – and may even put them at risk.🧵
Community sponsorship is an important part of any protection system and a great way for people to show their support – but it can only ever be a drop in the ocean of what's needed.
Current sponsorship schemes take 150 refugees a year in total. 2.5 million Ukrainians have fled.
Ukrainians arriving through this scheme won't be given refugee status, falling short of the protection guarantee they should expect.
This also limits access to benefits which could be essential if they have difficulties with their sponsor.
This clause allows refugees to be treated differently just because of how they travelled to the UK.
Regardless of their need for safety, some refugees will only be given temporary protection and fewer rights than others.
As a result, anyone claiming asylum who has had to pass through another country (I.e. the MAJORITY) will be discriminated against after they are granted refugee status.
They will have no chance of securing right to settlement for at least ten years. Worse still, the UK will repeatedly review their case in the hope of deporting them elsewhere.
Are you finding it politically unrewarding to run an asylum system that keeps people safe? It’s hard! We’ve got the solution for the ambitious politician... BÖRDER KRISÍS!
Build it yourself and see how useful it can be to justify things like an #AntiRefugeeBill. Instructions⬇️
Here’s what you’ll need to get started on your BÖRDER KRISÍS.
You need a big frame for your BÖRDER KRISÍS. Don’t worry that your frame doesn’t fit the facts, the rest of the steps will show you how to make it look like the facts fit your frame.
Remember, when you’re building a BÖRDER KRISÍS – appearances are everything.
We know that the asylum system is failing people seeking safety. But the changes proposed by @pritipatel are a wrecking ball to the right to claim asylum and will deepen the injustices we already see. It's the biggest attack on the right to claim asylum we've ever seen in the UK.
People fleeing for their lives have little choice in how they seek safety. There is no ‘wrong type’ of refugee. But these reforms punish refugees for how they enter the country, creating one rule for some, and a different rule for others.
People seeking asylum are already demonised while desperately trying to navigate a complex system. Creating a divide based on how people try to reach safety will further fuel the harassment, violent attacks and hate crimes people already experience.