2. Audio recording is a meeting with several people who don't have security clearances.
If Trump discussed content of document it is even worse - and raises its own criminal exposure.
These individuals are all likely good witnesses, with disincentive to lie given their number.
3. Bedminster
CNN: The audio recording shows prosecutors "are not only looking at Trump’s actions regarding classified documents recovered from his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida, but also at what happened at Bedminster" summer 2021.
That's where meeting occurred.
4. War plans are among the most highly classified documents.
Puts pressure on DOJ to indict, and a jury to convict.
5. As CNN reporting notes, this recording also goes to show knowledge and intent:
"The recording indicates Trump understood he retained classified material after leaving the White House."
6. The recording also appears to knock a hole in already very weak (non-defense) defense of declassification:
"On the recording, Trump’s comments suggest he would like to share the information but he’s aware of limitations on his ability post-presidency to declassify records."
7. Make no mistake. This is squarely an Espionage Act case. It is not simply an "obstruction" case.
There is now every reason to expect former President Trump will be charged under 18 USC 793(e) of the Espionage Act.
The law fits his reported conduct like a hand in glove.
8. Prosecutors do not need to show motive for conviction, but it helps with a jury.
CNN report suggests motives: To hold onto docs as trophies, to use to settle scores or try to retain control over the narrative - here to try (in vain) to contradict @sbg1's reporting on Milley.
9. NYT corroborates CNN scoop plus with this specificity:
“Trump then began referencing a document that he had with him,”
saying it was compiled by Gen. Milley and related to attacking Iran.
WaPo: @SecRubio, in step with Sebastian Gorka, is tripling down on bad idea.
Trying to enlist foreign states in bogus antifa fight at July 16 ministerial
WaPo: Rubio-Gorka alienating U.S. allies in true counterterrorism efforts
I wrote on threats to American civil liberties⬇️
2/
Rubio Tries to Enlist Other Nations in Antifa Fight, But Some Allies Recoil washingtonpost.com/national-secur…
(by @nakashimae @John_Hudson @mradamtaylor
@nakashimae @John_Hudson @mradamtaylor 3/ Gorka "has had discussions with colleagues about using foreign terrorism labels for antifa to justify going after Americans ....
A linkage to foreign terrorist groups 'can unlock certain investigative tools,' such as surveillance, said one U.S. counterterrorism official."
In this brief video, I put the prosecution of Davey Hearn, former Olympian, in the context of U.S. Attorney Pirro's pattern of abuse of power.
The arraignment (for reflecting pool felony charges) is on Thursday in DC.
1/🧵
2/ Judge Boasberg on Pirro's bid to criminally pursue Federal Reserve Chair:
DOJ "produced essentially zero evidence to suspect Chair Powell of a crime; indeed, its justifications are so thin and unsubstantiated that the Court can only conclude that they are pretextual."
3/ Magistrate Judge Faruqui:
"Given that there have been an unprecedented number of cases that the U.S. Attorney dismissed in the past ten days ... the Court is left to question if this principle [of DOJ Manual to prosecute only when more likely than not defendant will be found guilty] still applies."
"Katie Phang ... brings this action against Todd Blanche ... claiming that he has improperly withheld information and failed to comply with other requirements in violation of the Epstein Act."
"[T]he Court GRANTS Ms. Phang’s motion."
1/🧵
2/ "Ms. Phang identifies five categories of violations of the Epstein Act."
[See 5 in screenshot below.]
"The Attorney General does not respond substantively to any of these arguments."
"Accordingly, Ms. Phang is likely to succeed on the
merits."
3/ Corresponding to the five categories, Judge Sullivan states it is "ORDERED that by no later than July 2, 2026, the Attorney General shall" produce the documents or show cause.
3/ "Mr. Miller chairs a bimonthly meeting — called a 'wins' meeting — at which various government agencies report on recent successes, with the Pentagon’s death toll from boat strikes regularly highlighted as one of the biggest."
Hegseth's Defense Department's flat denial from March 31 (now appears to be provably false)⤵️
3/ BBC also fact checked the DoD's denial:
Six experts "all commented independently ... citing the missile's visual features, the way it exploded, its trajectory and the number of strikes in the area."