And when you THINK you are done destroying him, destroy him some more.

@BBCNews @SkyNews @itvnews @Channel4News

DON'T forget to report on the June 13th fatal motion put forward by @GreenJennyJones because Labour is to weak to bring one.

And why she has been forced to do this.

You are embarrassingly silent.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John West 🕯💙🇺🇦

John West 🕯💙🇺🇦 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JohnWest_JAWS

Jun 2
What could be on the WhatsApp's?

Probably lots of outgoing stuff to the deleted ERG WhatsApp group.

Oh, and deliberate democide in order to achieve "herd immunity"
Oh, and don't forget the questions Baronet Hallett has already asked: Image
Read 4 tweets
Jun 2
Johnson has been trying to conceal his early messages for a LONG time.

The claim he had "handed them all over" was always going to be false.

As false as @RishiSunak claiming to be "fully complying"

He gets away with it because they are ALL hiding

1/
How many?

In all honesty, I would not be surprised if Baroness Hallett revealed she had received NO messages from ANY party

A missive from April reveals some.

Reynolds, Udnay

And Mirza, who is especially interesting

2/ Image
Think back & you may recall Steve Baker deleting the ERG WhatsApp group because it was "No longer needed"

Well, I think it is needed.
By the inquiry, in full, just to ensure covid discussions where not taking place there.

And if you think deleted means destroyed, you're daft.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 1
It is not unreasonable to hand over all documentation to the covid inquiry, unredacted.

Baroness Hallett is the competent body to redact information to protect the innocent & irrelevant - not the cabinet office.

The cabinet office may well be complicit & is shown to be leaky.
Be assured, Johnson has played a devious game here.

He COULD have handed the materials directly to the inquiry (there is no requirement to hand to the cabinet office).

This false nonsense would then never have arisen.

He chose not to.
He chose to put the cabinet office front & centre of the story - and then pull the rug out from under them by saying he would hand over to the inquiry directly if asked.

And that the cabinet office has had access to the information for "several months"

This causes several plays
Read 7 tweets
May 30
This is the "What if?" tweet.

Twitter is abuzz with why Johnson doesn't want his WhatsApp messages going to the covid inquiry.

But Johnson himself says he has not been asked for them by the Cabinet Office and is happy to provide them.

🧵/1
What if the question is "What doesn't the Cabinet Office want to be seen?"

I doubt it is dodgy PPE deals - we all know about that, and they have crap reasons that allow them to get away with how they were awarded.

🧵/2
It is unlikely to be jokey Tory messages - they would be irrelevant in the eyes of the inquiry (but ammunition in the public eyes)

So, what if it is that the messages show up planned decisions AGAINST the best interests of the public?

Disregard for public health?

🧵/3
Read 6 tweets
May 13
++ Tax Credits & Universal Credit ++

++ The clog in the machine ++

These 2 items are a moral dilemma in our country

Another thread form chats with my friend.

Let's look at Tax Credits first.

Designed to "allow" people to go back to work by providing ADDITIONAL income

1/
This would TOP UP salaries, so "allowing" single parents to pay for childcare to return to work etc.

A noble intent & sentiment - IF pure in the sense of understanding the key words.

"Additional" and "Top up"

2/
But why is topping up stagnant salaries via the treasury seen as the ideal solution?

Why not simply impose a minimum wage at a level where people could afford to live?

That would put money back into their OWN hands.

Autonomous financial units, beholden to nobody.

3/
Read 10 tweets
May 13
"The Bank of England are perpetrating a massive fraud.

Portraying inflation as the enemy and interest rates as the key"

Another long thread from my chats with my economics friend.

Bear with me, this is a lesson AND a story.

Again, their words.

1/
Economics was 1st explained to me in the 80's, via the metaphorical need of Scottish society for cans of Tenents larger & Lee's Macaroon bars.

I still equate things in those terms when analysing intent.

It works across every market sector, business & service touched by Gov.

2/
Back in the 80's, the rough illustration was that the health of companies like Tenents & Lee's was a barometer of wider economic fortune.

Scenario:

I am unemployed but get a job at BAE (who temporarily expand their workforce to fulfil a new government contract)

3/
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(