#TwitterFiles@elonmusk 1/ URGENT: Twitter's own lawyers believed the company could not successfully defend its Covid vaccine censorship policies against my lawsuit over its 2021 ban of my account.
2/ Twitter was likely to lose Berenson v Twitter, my federal lawsuit against the company for banning me over my mRNA vaccine reporting, Twitter’s lawyers concluded after reviewing internal documents related to the ban.
3/ The documents, whose details remain secret but which the lawyers called “problematic” and “sensitive,” also show Twitter’s most senior executives disagreed over its decision to censor me in the summer of 2021.
4/ The newly revealed secret debate inside Twitter’s former leadership highlights the still-unanswered question of whether Twitter banned me because it feared government or corporate retribution for allowing me to continue to publish on its site.
5/ That issue is central to Berenson v Biden, my new lawsuit against the @WhiteHouse and @pfizer for allegedly conspiring to violate my First Amendment rights by coercing Twitter to ban me.
It also impacts Missouri v Biden, about broader federal social media censorship efforts.
6/ Exactly what the documents say is still unclear. The lawyers describe them only generally. But they troubled the lawyers so much, the lawyers advised Twitter to settle my suit rather than risk them becoming public - even if the company had to agree to most of my demands.
7/ Twitter's lawyers mention the documents in two separate email chains in 2022. The chains, which include Twitter’s then-general counsel, Sean Edgett, were given to me by Michael Shellenberger. @shellenberger found them in Twitter’s records during his Twitter Files reporting.
8/ In 2020 and spring 2021, Twitter encouraged me to use my account to cover Covid and the mRNA jabs and defended my right to do so to critics.
9/ But it abruptly reversed course in summer 2021, after federal officials demanded censorship and @JoeBiden said social media companies were “killing people” by allowing their users to question the shots.
10/ After warning me three times in July 2021, Twitter banned me Aug. 28, 2021 for allegedly violating its Covid-19 rules. At the time, I was a leading critic of potential mRNA jab mandates and my tweets on the safety and efficacy of the shots were viewed millions of times a day.
11/ I sued Twitter four months later in federal court in San Francisco, alleging it had broken its own rules and violated my rights when it banned me.
12/ In July 2022, Twitter and I settled my lawsuit. Twitter restored my account and admitted I hadn’t violated its rules. But Twitter has never explained why it censored me. The analysis its lawyers made suggests it did not believe it could convince a jury it could.
13/ Karen Colangelo, Twitter’s head of global litigation, and Micah Rubbo, associate director for litigation, reached that conclusion after reviewing Twitter’s internal discussions about my ban, the May 2022 email chain shows.
14/ Colangelo described the documents as “problematic” and “sensitive.” She and Rubbo recommended Twitter meet many of my settlement demands in the lawsuit to avoid handing them over.
15/ My settlement remains secret (though I have asked @elonmusk, who bought Twitter in October 2022, after the settlement was reached, for the right to publish it).
16/ But according to the email chain, my demands included restoring my account, giving me special protection against future bans, turning over communications and complaints Twitter had received about me from outside sources, and allowing me to publish whatever it gave me.
17/ The company faced a stark choice, Rubbo concluded in analyzing a potential settlement: “Are we willing to litigate and risk the potential public disclosure of *many* documents in order to prevent disclosure of some of them now?”
18/ The decision was especially complicated because Twitter was still sorting through its files and didn’t know what all of them contained, Rubbo wrote.
19/ The company was very concerned with giving me special protection, according to the email chain. But it ultimately believed it could find a solution by offering me access to a neutral arbitrator.
20/ Twitter’s lawyers also considered if it should simply “significantly increase our monetary offer and take reinstatement off the table,” but ultimately decided not to bother trying to buy its way out of the lawsuit “as money doesn’t seem to be the motivating force here.”
21/ In a separate August 2022 email, Rubbo explained the documents Twitter kept secret in the settlement with me reveal “debate and disagreement” among Twitter’s “leadership” over its censorship decisions.
22/ Lower-level employees in the company’s Trust and Safety (T&S) unit, the division responsible for making most ban and censorship decisions, also disagreed about Twitter’s actions, according to the documents.
23/ The May and August email chains became available because of Musk’s decision to open Twitter’s internal records to journalists to reveal the political and censorship pressures Twitter has faced. Those records and the articles about them are generally called the Twitter Files.
24/ Michael Shellenberger, who has written several Twitter Files articles, discovered the emails as part of his research and provided them to me. @shellenberger
25/ The documents Twitter provided to me in the settlement last year showed that both the White House and Pfizer board member Dr. Scott Gottlieb pressured the company to censor me over my reporting.
26/ Those revelations became the core of Berenson v Biden, which I filed in April in federal court in New York, naming six defendants, including President Biden, Dr. Gottlieb, and Pfizer’s chief executive Albert Bourla.
27/ But the newly revealed emails from Twitter’s lawyers suggest that when it turned over documents to me last year, Twitter used the narrowest possible definition.
28/ The company appears to have included only internal discussions that occurred directly from specific external communications. Did the company’s leaders or other employees discuss how the overall censorship pressures Twitter faced in 2021 should affect my reporting and account?
29/ If those documents exist, Twitter’s lawyers viewed them as outside the settlement and did not disclose them, keeping me from seeing them.
This is a good and fair question that I promise to answer at length on a Stack. But I will say the choice to settle was very complicated for all kinds of reasons - including the prospect of Elon's takeover, which meant that ultimately I would have been suing him if I'd continued.
I will also say (not to jump on the Stack) that when you are in the middle of negotiating over a complex and unique lawsuit, you have to guess at lots of things - including why the other side might WANT to settle at all...
This isn't a slip-and-fall where both sides know pretty much what it's worth, it's more like very high stakes poker. We knew we had a strong case, and Twitter's eagerness to settle confirmed that...
"I’m 30, generally healthy aside from episodic migraines with aura and depression, 4 times vaxxed, and I took Paxlovid..."
That's a G, $400 for the jabs plus $800 for the cold medicine. (She's 30 and skinny, zero risk.)
"Migraines with aura and depression" is your next clue...
"[No] full-on fever and I wasn’t about to pass out but I was EXTREMELY sick. If my oxygen levels hadn’t stayed 95% and above, I would have gone to the hospital."
Wait, you didn't have a fever/dizziness but you almost went to the ER? Also, why were you checking your O2 levels?
1/ Funny story about opiates. Put it in the weird but true category!
China had a big ol' problem with opium in the 19th and early 20th centuriues. Our fault (okay, the Brits too), we shoved opium down their throats. Fought a war to make them import it. I know, not nice...
2/ But hey, the Chinese had all this tea and silver and silk, and it was ours for the taking if we just got them hooked on the shit.
Anyhoo, we pretty much ruined China, the whole ruling class was too high to function, dynastic collapse, civil war, famines, whatevs...
3/ Then Mao and the Communists came along. And it took a while but they kicked Chaing Kai-shek's ass and sent him to Taiwan. And guess what the Communists liked even less than greedy landowners and other capitalist pigs?
@kevinnbass Here’s Switzerland, which conveniently breaks deaths into over and under 65 - note the big post-boost winter spike in over 65s (link next tweet, you can download the actual numbers):
1/ I am furious over the raccoon dog paper. It is nonsense, as the people involved must know.
The idea raccoon dogs might be the source of Sars-Cov-2 is not new. China started looking at them THREE YEARS AGO.
Only one problem: outside labs, raccoon dogs don't carry Sars-Cov-2.
2/ Last year, German scientists tried to find Sars-Cov-2 in raccoon dogs. Sars-Cov-2 is endemic in Germany; practically every human has been infected, many more than once.
3/ "No concrete evidence of SARS-CoV-2 circulation in the German population of raccoons and raccoon dogs can be deduced, not even their susceptibility to the virus."
Their words, not mine.
Yet somehow these animals efficiently transmitted the coronavirus to humans in 2019?