Millennials and Gen Z were already facing a far worse standard of living -- largely the fault of boomer elites.
Convenient to say there's no other option. That it's the only way to save humanity. That you *must* sacrifice.
It taps into primal human instincts -- instincts that don't require evidence.
In virtually every society, across all of history, people have been persuaded to sacrifice in the promise of salvation.
What does this impulse look like in a secular society?
It becomes a good-vs-evil struggle, pitting those who are willing to sacrifice against those who are not.
Perfect for the activist class who have much in common with old-school religious zealots.
Is it a coincidence that they enjoy iconoclasm so much?
So, what should gamers and the industry expect?
A relentless push to reduce standards/quality, funded by elite institutions, backed by elite media, and spearheaded by activists motivated by quasi-religious impulses.
Of the remaining teams, the worst are England and Belgium. Switzerland are also bad.
Wales, like the rest of the British teams, were also big on kneeling. They were knocked out today👌 thesun.co.uk/sport/15221988…
Denmark, which knocked out Wales (4-0 lmao) seem ambivalent on kneeling. They don't care much either way.
Other remaining teams in this category: Italy (some players kneeled, some haven't) France (initially planned to kneel, but noticed the fan feedback), Germany. #EURO2020
Sweden and Ukraine, one of whom will be knocked out on Tuesday, have not taken a knee at all. Nor have they said anything. Seems they're staying out of it.
Spain and Portugal also seem to be staying out of it. No kneeling, no comment on kneeling. #EURO2020
"Global elites" is a misunderstood term. They aren't primarily the politicians. They're the NGOs, corporations, media conglomerates, academic institutions, pressure groups and bureaucrats that shape the views and policies of politicians. They aren't always successful.
Politicians range from those who are 100% agents of that ecosystem (Buttigieg, Clinton, Blair) and those who are 100% independent of them (Orban, Salvini, Bolso).
But there are also plenty of politicians who are in between those two extremes. Boris Johnson is one example.
There are also countries that are completely outside the ecosystem. Hungary has shaken off most of it, Poland is also in the process of doing so. Russia and China were obviously never a part of it (but you still probably wouldn't want to live in the latter).
Boris Johnson was alarmed by Twitter’s censorship of Trump during the election and was considering new laws as of November. That was *before* Trump was fully banned. dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8…
I've seen a lot of media-democrat outrage spirals so I know how they go... thread:
Day 1: Media gaslights conservatives into engaging with their concerns in good faith. Dead Syrian refugees, George Floyd, etc. Anyone who offers a contrary opinion is immediately destroyed. The smart conservatives stay silent. Cowardly ones grovel.
Day 2: Either more facts emerge, or the media-dems overreach, revealing the horrifying breadth of its agenda, the depth of their plans to control the population, eliminate rights and liberties, and otherwise reshape society. Dissent starts to emerge.
There were always people inside the tech giants who wanted censorship. But numbers swelled because of agitation from the media, and media-inspired ad boycotts immeasurably strengthened their hand. More than Democrats, more than the tech companies themselves, the media did this.
Panics over "fake news" and "misinformation" didn't start inside the tech companies. They started in the media, were picked up by the most radical employees inside the companies, who went on to craft the policies that would placate the media -- until the next panic.