Allum Bokhari Profile picture
Jun 1 9 tweets 4 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
"Net Zero" is coming to the video games industry. But what is Net Zero and why should you care?

The subheading of this CNET article carries the core concept.

"What will games have to give up?"

Spreading into every industry, Net Zero makes the same demand.

Sacrifice.
🧵👇 Image
"Net Zero" is everywhere, but it always makes the same demand: lower your standards!

Lower-quality protein: bugs instead of steak.

Lower-quality stoves: electric instead of gas.

And now, lower-quality video games.
breitbart.com/tech/2023/05/3…
Air travel is a major example.

France recently banned short-haul passenger flights, forcing people to drive or take the train instead.

Only for commercial airlines, of course. Private jets can still do short-haul trips in France.

This is a pattern.
breitbart.com/europe/2022/12…
The unspoken mechanism of "Net Zero" is forcing everyday consumers to bear the costs or carbon reductions.

The wealthy will still be able to buy gas stoves, private flights, and regular meat.

It will simply become too expensive for everyday consumers.
bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
You don't *have* to harm consumers to reduce carbon emissions.

A Finnish nuclear plant recently had to pause its output, because it was making electricity TOO cheap.

But this misses the point of Net Zero.

"Net Zero" isn't the goal.

Sacrifice is.
zerohedge.com/energy/finnish…
It's hard not to see sinister motives at work.

Millennials and Gen Z were already facing a far worse standard of living -- largely the fault of boomer elites.

Convenient to say there's no other option. That it's the only way to save humanity. That you *must* sacrifice. Image
It taps into primal human instincts -- instincts that don't require evidence.

In virtually every society, across all of history, people have been persuaded to sacrifice in the promise of salvation.

What does this impulse look like in a secular society? ImageImageImage
It becomes a good-vs-evil struggle, pitting those who are willing to sacrifice against those who are not.

Perfect for the activist class who have much in common with old-school religious zealots.

Is it a coincidence that they enjoy iconoclasm so much? ImageImageImage
So, what should gamers and the industry expect?

A relentless push to reduce standards/quality, funded by elite institutions, backed by elite media, and spearheaded by activists motivated by quasi-religious impulses.

Be prepared!

breitbart.com/tech/2023/05/3…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Allum Bokhari

Allum Bokhari Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AllumBokhari

Jun 26, 2021
Your guide to virtue-signaling at #EURO2020

Of the remaining teams, the worst are England and Belgium. Switzerland are also bad.

Wales, like the rest of the British teams, were also big on kneeling. They were knocked out today👌
thesun.co.uk/sport/15221988…
Denmark, which knocked out Wales (4-0 lmao) seem ambivalent on kneeling. They don't care much either way.

Other remaining teams in this category: Italy (some players kneeled, some haven't) France (initially planned to kneel, but noticed the fan feedback), Germany. #EURO2020
Sweden and Ukraine, one of whom will be knocked out on Tuesday, have not taken a knee at all. Nor have they said anything. Seems they're staying out of it.

Spain and Portugal also seem to be staying out of it. No kneeling, no comment on kneeling.
#EURO2020
Read 5 tweets
Jan 11, 2021
"Global elites" is a misunderstood term. They aren't primarily the politicians. They're the NGOs, corporations, media conglomerates, academic institutions, pressure groups and bureaucrats that shape the views and policies of politicians. They aren't always successful.
Politicians range from those who are 100% agents of that ecosystem (Buttigieg, Clinton, Blair) and those who are 100% independent of them (Orban, Salvini, Bolso).

But there are also plenty of politicians who are in between those two extremes. Boris Johnson is one example.
There are also countries that are completely outside the ecosystem. Hungary has shaken off most of it, Poland is also in the process of doing so. Russia and China were obviously never a part of it (but you still probably wouldn't want to live in the latter).
Read 4 tweets
Jan 11, 2021
The irony: Europe, without a First Amendment, may end up with more internet freedom than the US.

In Europe, governments decide definition of hate speech, extremism, etc. They are bound by legislative processes.

In the US, Silicon Valley decides. And it is not bound by anything.
Called it.

Even foreign politicians who are the complete opposite of Trump in terms of style/policy aren’t happy to see Silicon Valley silencing a world leader.
Boris Johnson was alarmed by Twitter’s censorship of Trump during the election and was considering new laws as of November. That was *before* Trump was fully banned.
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8…
Read 6 tweets
Jan 10, 2021
It's not like they put this all down in writing or anything.

breitbart.com/tech/2018/10/0…
Not like they were caught on video!
breitbart.com/tech/2018/09/1…
It's not like the made lists of dissidents to persecute...
breitbart.com/tech/2019/06/1…
Read 6 tweets
Jan 9, 2021
I've seen a lot of media-democrat outrage spirals so I know how they go... thread:
Day 1: Media gaslights conservatives into engaging with their concerns in good faith. Dead Syrian refugees, George Floyd, etc. Anyone who offers a contrary opinion is immediately destroyed. The smart conservatives stay silent. Cowardly ones grovel.
Day 2: Either more facts emerge, or the media-dems overreach, revealing the horrifying breadth of its agenda, the depth of their plans to control the population, eliminate rights and liberties, and otherwise reshape society. Dissent starts to emerge.
Read 5 tweets
Jan 9, 2021
Journalists really are to blame for this.

The YouTube ad boycott, the Facebook ad boycott - that was all them.

The transformation of tech companies into weapons of the ruling elite would not have happened without constant pressure from the media.
There were always people inside the tech giants who wanted censorship. But numbers swelled because of agitation from the media, and media-inspired ad boycotts immeasurably strengthened their hand. More than Democrats, more than the tech companies themselves, the media did this.
Panics over "fake news" and "misinformation" didn't start inside the tech companies. They started in the media, were picked up by the most radical employees inside the companies, who went on to craft the policies that would placate the media -- until the next panic.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(