Lakshya Jain Profile picture
Jun 1 4 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
The interesting thing about Steve Garvey entering #CASen and running a well-funded campaign is that this changes the calculus for the Democrats running.

Garvey likely advances to the general, so the round-1 leader between Schiff/Porter/Lee would be the de-facto next Senator.
*However*, if Garvey didn't get in, you could see a scenario in which a Dem-on-Dem second round would result in all kinds of coalitions being formed between the voters of the eliminated candidates.

Like, if it's Schiff vs Porter, who would Barbara Lee's supporters break for?
And so if Garvey gets in and locks up the GOP vote, that means the first round becomes way more important for the Democratic candidates, because whoever leads this one would likely be the only Dem candidate advancing. Which may result in totally different campaign strategies.
It is not the job of Republicans to elect Democrats (though they do an amazing job of that lately), but Garvey would be a boon to Adam Schiff. Rs would almost certainly break for whichever candidate opposes him in round 2, which would have made his task vs Porter/Lee harder.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lakshya Jain

Lakshya Jain Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lxeagle17

Jun 2
Here we go. Introducing @SplitTicket_'s 2024 Presidential ratings.

split-ticket.org/2023/06/02/our…
@SplitTicket_ Went back and forth a lot on these ratings, but I think it makes no sense to assume we know what the 2024 environment will be, in which a Trump-Biden rematch is likely to happen but polling and signals are all over the place. So the current baseline is a 2020 redux.
@SplitTicket_ I don't think it makes sense to play the uncertainty angle for the sake of it, so we're not putting Virginia or Maine at Likely Democratic, nor are we putting Michigan at tossup (because like...why?). But I think there is enough uncertainty in PA, WI, and NC to warrant caution.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 1
A couple points to note on the excellent @Nate_Cohn's piece today on millennials.

(1) the generational lean of millennials/gen Z is ahistorically Dem in absolute terms

(2) the typical aging shift right doesn't erase the sheer size of the partisan gap

nytimes.com/2023/06/01/ups…
@Nate_Cohn In our first @SplitTicket_ piece on young voters and their Democratic leans, we noted the same thing in exit polling. But the fact remains that millennials are ahistorically Dem, and even the largest swing right observed does not erase this gap.

split-ticket.org/2022/08/01/is-…
@Nate_Cohn @SplitTicket_ The problem with millennials being insanely blue isn't necessarily that they *won't* shift to the right. It's that political affiliation seems much more stable than people think, so the traditional aging shift to the right is not big enough to fix this gap.
Read 7 tweets
May 25
The universe would be a much better place if we all took ourselves a little less seriously with a little less self-importance
“it is important to me to take my public leadership seriously” sorry but literally who are you
what does any of this mean and why does it matter, this is the type of thing that spawns the memes about leftists on Twitter Image
Read 4 tweets
May 24
Under every data lens taken on this topic, the story is clear: election denial is really unpopular, and quantifiably so. At @SplitTicket_, we find the performance difference between election acceptors and deniers to be ~4 points in margin in battlegrounds

split-ticket.org/2023/05/24/the…
@SplitTicket_ That's true whether you look at stuff done by us, the @UpshotNYT, @gelliottmorris, or @Catalist_US. This is a fantastic way for a party to keep losing winnable races and it's likely part of what cost the GOP the senate in 2022.
We estimated it only for federal races (as we have WAR scores for this), but Ron DeSantis has famously avoided answering basically anything to do with the 2020 election for now, so it's anyone's guess as to how (or if) he does tackle it when pressed on it at debates. But...
Read 6 tweets
May 18
Twenty years ago, both parties came up with conflicting theories on how they were entering a new age of dominance.

Neither of them panned out, so now everyone is determined to ignore *any* signs of danger for either party because things always work themselves out automatically.
I have written many times about how I think the fact that there are only two parties means that neither the GOP nor the Dems are likely to ever really be locked out of power for too long — the vacuum created by dissatisfied voters is usually filled by someone eventually. But...
How is that filled? By one party pivoting their messaging to fill take in groups of dissatisfied voters. Rs haven't done that yet. Increasingly, what they've done is appeal to seniors at the cost of decreasing margins with Millennials/Gen-z. This is not a sustainable strategy.
Read 5 tweets
May 17
It is preposterous that arguably the biggest elections website in the world can create a misleading, multi-thousand word article on the Red Wave That Wasn't which simply says that the GOP ran decent candidates and was blindsided by Democratic money and mail-in ballot harvesting.
I'm sorry, I really do hate to be critical of any forecaster or analyst, because I know how hard elections analysis is. But we also have a duty to stay factual and honest, and all this article does is skirt around and wrongly dismiss things that we have obvious data.
What irritates me is that this is the same site that built a "poll unskewer" in 2022 despite having absolutely no factual or historical basis to suggest that this was a good or serious idea. Hundreds of thousands of people read them, and it's borderline misrepresentation of data.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(