“The more colour-coordinated the Bookshelf, the worse the content will be”
“I have decided to do some investigation into photos of Bugwoman bookshelves, or #Bookshelfies as these vacuous NPCs call them”
This Thread was first posted by Mencius Moldbugman
Mencius Moldbugman’s Iron Rule of Bookshelves: The more colour-coordinated the bookshelf, the worse the content will be.
Real readers read books to learn, Bugpeople use books as decoration and for social status points.
Colour-Coordinated Bookshelves mostly belong to “Book-Obsessives”. Most of these "Book-Obsessed" Bugpeople are women. The vast majority of their books are emotional pornography AKA chick-lit. This pink selection is the female equivalent of a man showing off vintage retro nudes.
Needless to say, geek culture and fake book idolatry go hand in hand.
Expect lots of adult graphic novels, Neil Gaiman, Harry Potter, self-help books, George RR Martin.
Don't expect: hard sci-fi, Russian classics, anything written before 1998, Bible.
Aspiring Bugwomen authors tend to write Young Adult Fiction or Fantasy because they think it is easier to write, plus it's currently trendy. Instead of working on their craft they hope that surrounding themselves with similar books will help them instead. Heh, women...
Often these adults know deep in their hearts that reading children's books is embarrassing, which is why there exists an industry for kid's books with "mature" covers in an attempt to add authenticity to their shallow geek culture.
Often these book collections are used as a replacement for religion. When hard truths and old religions are removed from the shelf, expect lots of "spiritual but not religious" whimsy... and lots of Harry Potter.
You will never find anything of value in these bookshelves. Just decor, Bugperson narcissism, and hijacking a once intellectual pursuit for social points. It's literature as a tool for masturbation.
Every. Single. Time.
As far as I know, this thread is not archived anywhere - if you know of an archive link please reply below. This thread has been recreated through existing screenshots.
The year is 2050. Changing demographics have Latinamerica-fied your politics - like in Latin America western countries are now condemned to neverending lurching between two ideological extremes that then only further radicalise in reaction to each other. Which side do you choose?
America will fulfil its destiny and become the penultimate Latin American country in the Americas, before Canada which will first become a Subcontinental country and then a Latin American country after the Latinos move up into it from America. Trump is the first American Caudillo
This is the politics you get if you de-Basically Fine-ify your society with decades upon decades of Ideology-maxxing
HOW NATIVES THINK - WHY MANY PEOPLE SEEM TO THINK SO IRRATIONALLY 🧵
Lucien Lévy-Bruhl was an early 20th century French anthropologist writing before many of the taboos academic anthropology has accumulated today. In his book ‘How Natives Think’ he explores why so many people - and for him especially so many ‘non-civilised’ peoples - seem to be so superstitious. He tries to explain what it is that is happening inside the minds of (he calls them) ‘natives’ when, for example, they appear to have difficulty understanding causality in anything other than in terms of spirits or djinns. Though the work is not without its critics (eg it has been called reductive, eurocentric and generalising) it is an interesting example of taboo-free study on the ubiquity of a kind of magical thinking or djinnbrain
Lévy-Bruhl’s core claim is that so-called “primitive” peoples do not think illogically as such, but instead according to different rules. Reasoning is primarily shaped by emotion, symbolism and collective belief, not contradiction or empirical causation
That is, their thinking is guided by collective representations - shared mental images (like totems, taboos, spirits) that have a deep emotional force. See: the power of djinn in some societies (ie Djinnbrain). These guide thought and action without needing justification
New Article in the Telegraph on ‘The Yookay’ and my @MythoYookay page. “The "Yookay" now has a wider implication too: to suggest … we are now a new country, an actual successor state to the old Great Britain”
Impressions from recent visit to Zagreb and the ways in which the city is and is not changing in the 2020’s 🧵
This is not a complaining thread, more just to describe Zagreb as it is today and the extent to which Zagreb is or is not changing. ‘TLDR’ - Zagreb is not as interesting VS Croatia’s coastal areas but it less touristy, a good ‘local’ city. Guest workers recently started to arrive
Don’t think visitors will ever really be blown away by Zagreb but it’s not a bad city. Very similar in layout and look to smaller capitals of other smaller Eastern European cities, eg Bratislava, Ljubljana, Sofia, Belgrade, Vilnius and so on. Wealthier than some of those at least
BBC Journalist asks Danish Politician how Denmark is able to maintain trust in its Democracy - “Give voters what they want. If they want lower immigration lower it”
Advanced Techniques for Expert Democracy-Heads (Experts Only) to maintain trust in your Democratic System
• Release all data for transparency, even if the findings are uncomfortable
• If voters want lower immigration, lower immigration
• Don’t allow foreign ghettos to form
In the C19th and 20th large numbers of Nepali workers were settled in the Himalayan Kingdom of Sikkim, over time becoming a majority - this demographic change providing the impetus for the eventual dissolution of the historic Sikkim state 🧵
Sikkim, once a sovereign Himalayan kingdom, saw its tenability as a state dramatically contested by waves of Nepali migration - initially as labourers, but then as dominant political actors who transformed the state’s demographic and political character, eventually dissolving it
Old Sikkim was a Buddhist kingdom ruled by the Namgyal dynasty (1642–1975). The political system was feudal - led and upheld by the royal and spiritual authority of the Chogyal (king), with power shared among Bhutia aristocrats and local Lepcha chiefs under a theocratic-monarchy