Tim Meshginpoosh Profile picture
Jun 2 17 tweets 3 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
🧵Image Repair Analysis of Jim Bob Duggar's response to the documentary #ShinyHappyPeople
"The recent “documentary” that talks about our family is sad because in it we see the media and those with ill intentions hurting people we love."

They are leading off with an ATTACK which is part of a DARVO--Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender--strategy.
They are also GASLIGHTING, as the DARVO comes with a presentation of a set of, as Kellyanne Conway would call them, "alternative facts".

Fact is, some of Jim Bob's children and friends are telling their side of the story ON THEIR OWN FREE WILL.
"Like other families, ours too has experienced the joys and heartbreaks of life, just in a very public format. This “documentary” paints so much and so many in a derogatory and sensationalized way because sadly that’s the direction of entertainment these days."
This is MINIMIZATION and GASLIGHTING.

Why gaslighting? Remember: Jim Bob & Michelle were all too happy to use the media to craft a public image (that's what their reality program was), but are now whining at that same media reporting the "family jewels"? Now the media is evil?
It is MINIMIZING because the "family jewels", which includes their eldest son molesting at least 4 of his sisters, getting off scot-free, then getting outed in the Ashley Madison hack, then convicted for downloading Child Sexual Assault Materials (CSAM).
It is also MINIMIZING because they show no regard for the victims of the system they helped promote to the world. There is no attempt at ownership.
"We have always believed that the best chance to repair damaged relationships, or to reconcile differences, is through love in a private setting."

This is an ATTACK disguised as light MORTIFICATION (@jdahlmd this is its own level of evil).
Why is it an attack? Jim Bob and Michele have an enormous platform and network that they have used to control the narrative publicly--at great cost to others--but now they want to dictate the terms of reconciliation and force that to be private?
I call bullpoopoo.

If your use of a public forum adversely impacts the dignity of others, then you need to be grownup enough to accept a public rebuke and publicly admit your failures that contributed to this.
"We love every member of our family and will continue to do all we can to have a good relationship with each one."

This is BOLSTERING. They are elevating their status by stating their love, but have not acknowledged any ownership of wrongdoing.
"Through both the triumphs and the trials we have clung to our faith all the more and discovered that through the love and grace of Jesus, we find strength, comfort, and purpose."

This is TRANSCENDENCE. It's a form of BOLSTERING that appeals to a higher purpose (often ✝️).
TRANSCENDENCE is an effective Image Repair tactic in that it can be used to disarm the opposition, and also to shut down critics altogether by appealing to the high road.

You must ALWAYS be wary when it is used in crisis communication.
And whenever a minister, or public figure who is ostensibly Christian, is in a situation like this, you need to expect TRANSCENDENCE, as it is very common for them to lead and/or close with it in their communication.
What really bothers me about this statement, though?

IT IS ALL DUGGAR-CENTRIC!!!

There is no word of empathy for victims, not even in his own family.

No word of concern about the Gothardism they spent decades living & promoting.

Not one word of introspection.
This is pure, unadulterated damage control.
Oh. The full text of the statement I analyzed is right here.

duggarfamily.com/2023/06/a-note…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tim Meshginpoosh

Tim Meshginpoosh Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @oldreepicheep

Jun 3
Some thoughts on the responses of Jim Bob Duggar and the @iblp

(1) Jim Bob Duggar is a vile excuse of a human being.

(a) He let his son Josh skate with a pat on the butt when he molested at least 4 of his sisters and at least one other woman outside the family.
(b) JB focused on damage control when the news of Josh's molestations became public. All that mattered was keeping the show going. His daughters were forced to put the best face on what was a horrid set of abuses. All for the almighty Benjamin's.
(c) When Josh was on trial, JB flagrantly lied on the stand, claiming he "could not remember".

And yet he had the mental faculties to run for office while his son was on trial.
Read 24 tweets
Jun 2
🧵 Image Repair Analysis of the @iblp response to the documentary #ShinyHappyPeople

Here is a link to their statement
iblp.org/a-statement-on…

I'm going to use screenshots this time, as IBLP's statement is more verbose.
If you read Jim Bob Duggar's statement, you will notice a similarity in structure and verbiage.

Both of them lead off with DARVO. IBLP is slightly more emphatic with it.

This is not only DARVO, but a backhanded TRANSCENDENCE.

How so? Image
By categorizing the documentary as "a reflection of today's culture", they are aligning the victims with the world and themselves with God.

So it would be fair to call this DARVO via TRANSCENDENCE. (@jdahlmd we have another "winner" here.)
Read 18 tweets
Apr 2
🧵 Image Repair 101: when ministers use it.

When a minister (or church eldership team) makes a public statement during a time of crisis, here's what you need to watch out for and why.
1. TRANSCENDENCE

I mention this because it may be the most common IR tactic, and it is very deceptive and arrogating, and can even be an attack against victims, advocates, and other legitimate critics.
Oftentimes the pastor will frame himself as specially anointed, on a special mission, and a devoted servant "fighting the good fight" against the "armies of Satan".

The implication: all critics, including victims, are in league with Satan.
Read 14 tweets
Apr 2
🧵Image Repair 101. I think @Pastakeith wanted me to put up that thread, and it disappeared when I killed my old account. So I'm going to re-create it.

So what is Image Repair?
The short answer: a form of crisis communication which can be both natural but can also have levels of sophistication.

To show how it works, let's say you're a prominent senator who just learned that CNN is going to out you as a longtime patron of a local brothel.
Well, you're probably going to get a crisis communication expert. He or she is going to give you a communication strategy. But really, some of this is natural.

How might you respond in your statement?
Read 12 tweets
Apr 1
I would stop short of calling this 'persecution', as we throw that wors around way too often.

OTOH, it is fair that you have a large faction running a script--against conservative Christians--that isn't supported by the known evidence (which, admittedly, is thin right now) in… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
As far as we know at this time, this is not a narrative of "really evil fundamentalist Christian parents reject their LGBT child."

In fact, at face value, it seems to be the other way around.

Audrey was 28. She lived w/her parents.
That's a BFD here. I know kids who were kicked out of their homes by parents for being pregnant, "coming out", dressing immodestly, etc. I even know kids who were disowned for receiving Christ.

That was not in play here
Read 5 tweets
Apr 1
This is probably the most important takeaway in any discussion regarding abuse issues in the Church: the bad guy ALMOST NEVER "looks" like a bad guy. He's not the creepy pervert who wears a trench coat. He's not the antisocial bum who wears a tank top and shows off tattoos.
Oh noes...he is affable, charming, competent, an established professional, a devoted worker, a pillar of the community.

He'll pass the background check, because, as the line goes from Stripes: "never convicted."

How do we fix this?
TBH, it's complicated. Here's why.

Let's take @miller_abra's case for example. (For the record: I believe her.)

Let's assume I'm in the same church. Let's assume I'm not otherwise privy to anything. Let's assume I'm just a regular member, not in leadership.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(