1/ Brexit leave voters were told they were bigots, influenced by the far right, unspeakable, awful people for not accepting what they regarded as a forced team and asserting the identity they preferred
Sound familiar?
The UK, home of the reformation, WW2 stalwartness and Brexit
2/ Is precisely the wrong set of Islands to try to impose a global homophobic medical scandal upon. The French may riot more frequently and with more flair than we do, but our ability from the Civil War onward to persistently do sedition is without equal
3/ We are not a country where "international best practice" or American fads are awfully persuasive, they may have captured the devolved parliament in Scotland and the Senedd in Wales but that's against the wishes of the Welsh and Scots. And the Scots did for Sturgeon.
4/ We are uniquely placed to wave two fingers at the world and do our own thing because that has always been our way, often quietly, often grumbling, often voting and lobbying, often debating. But stand firm we do. And effectively. And stridently if needed.
5/ With a common law and unelected Judges and some of the most ferocious women and homosexuals you can encounter in Europe we are not a people to be pushed around. I say all this as a plastic Paddy and remain voter, but I never despised the leavers or this country.
6/ So naturally we are Terf island, naturally we are the single most likely place for LGBrexit, naturally we won't give up or lose our equilibrium and descend into infighting. When gender falls, and fall it will. It will fall first here on these islands. It's falling now.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Gender. It came from gay rights and and it must be defeated by gay rights. This cunning mimic wears the mask of gay rights and pretends to be us in all things so the voices of actual homosexuals speaking against it remain it's most implacable foe. So this pride we speak.
2/ Every gay voice against this evil ideology which sterilises autistic and gay youth is one less voice it can claim as part of it's gender borg collective. One more piece of evidence that that union is imperfect and incomplete. One more contradiction to it's claim to consensus.
3/ Pride months have passed without incident, with rictus awkward smiles and the crushing banality of rainbow logos in the west and inaction outside because the jackbook of gender so proficiently crushes dissent and disquiet. But no more does this obtain.
My not entirely serious take on what we learned is this:
1/ Two trans men in Norwich spend an awful lot of time burying SOMETHING on an allotment and have a sofa slightly too small for them.
2/ There is a quite jolly trans identified male called Katy who seems reasonable and has a REALLY cluttered but quite cosy house and is able to have a pint with lesbians and a discussion about matters without being strident which is good
3/ There is a rather anxious Cambridge trans identified male who thinks Prof Stock is basically sneaky in her use of the English language but that if you go "BEHIND THE WORDS SHE USES" (Like Diana Troi in Star Trek does) you find hated
One minute in and we hear someone can tell what Stock really thinks behind the cunning words she actually uses, this is some witchcraft level thought detection going on
1/ Along with my fellow gender borg drones, I heartily condemn Channel 4 news for allowing Prof. Stock to speak in a documentary that tends to show her as decent and reasonable. Had I known women were not being silenced and vilified, I would never have participated.
2/ Being @Channel4, I thought this would be like @Channel4News's recent hitjob on Baroness Falkner and run by the sort of producers who think a man using his penis to play the piano qualifies as "trans joy". I regret to report, to my horror, Stock has been allowed to speak.
3/ As we know, when she does so, the best thing is to have Ed Balls loudly talk over her or have a bunch of idiotic heterosexual students with blue hair accuse her of genocide or any other of several lies routinely deployed against her.
2/ Before I do, I shall some context. Mermaids is a child sex change charity under a safeguarding investigation by because it sends breast binders to children without parental consent and appointed a trustee who write papers about ejaculating near children bbc.co.uk/news/uk-631378…
3/ It has been frequently cited at the UK's premier gender identity clinic at the Tavistock as being an ideological force with far too much power over NHS treatment and featured in many court cases, an example here from a case involving the safeguarding lead at F(i)