Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Dennis Noel Kavanagh Profile picture
Dennis Noel Kavanagh
@Jebadoo2
Director at Gay Men’s Network, garrulous male homosexual. Lawyer. https://t.co/0OGiPeWn12
dniklasd Profile picture Jeni040866 Profile picture Martin Cleaver - 🇪🇺🇺🇦 Profile picture Liz Panton #WomensRightsAreHumanRights Profile picture Diane Jones #NoPronounsThankYou Profile picture 14 subscribed
Apr 16 • 12 tweets • 3 min read
1/🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

On puberty blockers, the FM's first thought is the failing child sex change outfit @stonewalluk

""I believe that er, as Stonewall has said, if there are some recommendations that are implemented properly that this could make a difference to young people’s healthcare" 2/ This is a disaster for Scottish gay/autistic youth. While Hunt begs forgiveness in the Times as she rewrites her part in this scandal, he invokes the Stonewall she created. The Stonewall that ushered in the chemical and surgical correction of kids.

Apr 14 • 9 tweets • 3 min read
1/ @PeterTatchell, I want to address some comments to you and shall do so as politely as the circumstances that obtain now permit me.

What you are doing here is advocating for chemical homophobic violence by gender medicine to be visited on the weakest there are you stupid fool. 2/ Let's see if we can get facts through your stupid thick head shall we? Recent research indicates "puberty blockers" cause testicular atrophy and increased cancer risk in boys

Understand Peter? Defenceless boys with avoidable cancer in their balls

Apr 13 • 24 tweets • 7 min read
1/ When gay children abandoned to gender needed Stonewall to stand up for them, Ruth Hunt wasn't even absent from her post, it was worse than that. She conspired against them, joined and led enemy forces and today she sets out her defence. But this prosecution is overwhelming. Image 2/ I remark in passing Stonewall could have stopped the Tavistock scandal at any time. At the height of its power, had Stonewall agreed with Dr Bell, Sue Evans, Marcus Evans, Sonia Appleby it would have ended. These heroes stood up for gay youth, Ruth Hunt stood against them.
Apr 9 • 16 tweets • 3 min read
1/ Dr Cass’s review leaves no room for doubt that Tavistock clinicians were correct when they said “it feels like a new form of gay conversion therapy” and the joked “soon there will be no gay people left”. Children thought to be gay were subject to medical experiments. 2/ Dr Cass’ report is of global significance and it makes clear that gender medicine is built on a false consensus. From the “Dutch protocol” to the “eunuch archive” castration fetishists connected to WPATH revealed by G. Gluck, this was not medicine, it was something darker
Apr 8 • 13 tweets • 5 min read
1/ There is an obnoxious and laughably false SNP defence line doing the rounds suggesting the Scottish Hate Crime mess is merely bringing Scotland "into line" with laws in England and Wales. I want to dispatch this falsehood in this thread with reference to the text of the acts Image 2/ The first thing to say about the Scottish Act is that is has no direct parallel to an English & Welsh statute in respect of the list of protected characteristics it covers. In England the equivalent offences are available only for race, religion, sexual orientation. Image
Apr 6 • 11 tweets • 5 min read
1/ I should like to ask @stonewalluk how they reconcile their statement on the left with the predictable, horrifying emerging truth Christina describes on the right and I should like to ask that on behalf of the generation of defenceless boys now grotesquely damaged by this cult
Image
Image 2/ Christina's entire thread on the matter here. I wish to make clear to Stonewall that they better well have an answer to my question because I mean to keep asking it and soon I suspect it will be a matter of pressing legal concern for many.

Apr 3 • 13 tweets • 4 min read
1/ Let's examine this statement shall we member of the jury and see just how much the twisting snake that is Stonewall will contort itself in its final fatal battle against inevitable and deserved irrelevance.

Well. You can now misgender with impunity says the snake it seems. Image 2/ Look at paragraph 3. Here the organisation formally led by Nancy Kelley, a woman who calls lesbians "sexual racists" accidentally gives the game away.

For it says biological truth is the just "no more" than as criticising religion.

Consider this hand shown on two counts.
Apr 2 • 8 tweets • 2 min read
1/ Where are you now gender Borg? Now your hate crime act in Scotland is defanged? Now your WPATH files show you for the reckless perverts playing with the bodies of children like meat? Now your conversion bans look like gay conversion 2.0? Where is your rainbow now? 2/ it was a corrupted rainbow, a chevron from the left that no sky ever saw and no citizen wanted to walk over at a crossing, in all things it was top down artifice and your be kind collection of frauds look like the tricksters they are
Mar 29 • 8 tweets • 2 min read
1/ @sueevansprotect's important CF is now up so may I ask that everyone considers a donation. Sue has been working with gender distress for almost 40 years and she is judicially reviewing private providers of hormones on the basis it's unsafe.

crowdjustice.com/case/protect-c… 2/ As Sue says "I want the court to set aside the registration by the CQC of Gender Plus Hormone Clinic to provide hormone treatment for teenagers. I also hope that this litigation will prevent the registration of other private clinics providing this controversial treatment...
Mar 23 • 11 tweets • 3 min read
1/ Violence, intimidation and anarchy are encoded deep in the DNA of gender borg's philosophy whether it's surgical violence against homosexuals, intimidation of women out of jobs or the anarchy of medication on demand. This is how predators prosper and this is what they are. 2/ This movement is imploding so it clutches tight to it's bosom the atavistic behaviour that always defined it, it descends to the level of animal instinct, the chanting thugs, the baying mob, the unironic but telling use of smoke bombs and the chaos of the smoke screen.
Mar 18 • 12 tweets • 3 min read
1/ In the new civic religion of gender grown in the shadows of the old ones with their dead gods, the same instinct for infallible papal pronouncements of doctrine obtains, today, the demand is that the word "homosexual" not be said. Strange times indeed these are. 2/ You'll note it's not (and never) "heterosexual", it's not (and never) "man", because we've seen "woman" reduced to a dirty word by the same sorts of outfits who tell us what to say, what to think and what words must be expunged from public discourse. Always the same targets.
Feb 23 • 13 tweets • 3 min read
1/ Peter with his new, corrupted rainbow might give away gay spaces easily now he has no need of them, but I beg to differ and make the case that that @dnalerinrehtron does. I want to make the emotional case for a single sex gay space and I shall do so in the following terms. 2/ When you've grown up different, other, not fitting in and not what you see on TV or not what your family particularly wanted or liked a gay space for a homosexual is a decompression. It's a space other than the real world, when you are young, it's the first space ever.
Feb 23 • 10 tweets • 3 min read
1/ I've completed a legal analysis of the Commons Private Member's Bill I did for GMN from the perspective of how the legislation works (or doesn't) as a criminal statute. You can read the somewhat detailed analysis here on my substack.

dennisnoelkavanagh.substack.com/?utm_source=na…
Image 2/ The final draft of the bill (version 7) is available here and there's a copy of the text of the bill as Annex A to the substack piece.

russell-moyle.co.uk/conversion/
Feb 18 • 10 tweets • 3 min read
1/ The @ForWomenScot appeal on the legal meaning of sex has massive implications for homosexuals. @michaelpforan explains why here but his brain is the size of a planet so my inferior criminal lawyer brain will do my best to break down what is being said here. It matters. 2/ According to the "Haldane judgment" (Brief explainer in the link below), "sex" in law doesn't mean what's between your legs, it means sex as modified by a gender recognition certificate. Sound innocuous of course. Like it doesn't make a difference.

Feb 16 • 11 tweets • 3 min read
1/ Fantastic news that @ForWomenScot have been granted permission to argue the "Haldane judgment" at the Supreme Court and will be crowdfunding this shortly.

For anyone interested in what this means legally here's a quick explainer. 2/ Permission to argue a case in front of the Supreme Court is exceptional and *extremely* rare. Plenty of good cases with contested points of law don't make the cut so this grant of permission is a powerful indication that the senior judiciary recognise this is really important
Feb 13 • 8 tweets • 2 min read
1/ You know, I think Simon Fanshawe will be able to handle this and look after himself because, unlike you lot, he fought hard for lesbian and gay rights at a time when it was very difficult to do so and activism involved more than positing on twitter how disappointed you are. 2/ Simon had the bravery to found Stonewall and he then had the bravery to make legitimate criticism of it. He's done so in an unfailingly civilised fashion and always favoured civil dialogue over mudslinging. To be clear, you position here is the inverse.
Feb 12 • 14 tweets • 5 min read
1/ @SamFowles, you've written a libellous and legally incoherent attack piece on the gender critical cases in the UK and you should withdraw many of the suggestions you make and correct the public misinformation you've spread here. I'll identify precisely what I mean. 2/ This is a complete misstatement of the law and it's scurrilous for you to suggest any of the cases you list later involved the brave women concerned "attacking" anyone. As a matter of fact the Equality Act protects any belief that passes the Grainger test, not just GC views. Image
Feb 6 • 6 tweets • 2 min read
1/ Kemi Badenoch has told MPs she has strong evidence that gay young people are being convinced they are transgender instead. She said children likely to grow up to be same-sex attracted “might be subjected to conversion practices” which persuade them to change gender."

telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/02/0… 2/ This is a seismic letter from Kemi Badenoch who has just cemented her place as a gay rights hero who history will judge as one of the few politicians prepared to say the unsayable and actually stand up for gay rights. We are so often unpopular, despised and converted. Image
Feb 5 • 6 tweets • 2 min read
1/ @MindCharity could you explain to me please why you are directing children to this organisation and its "webchat" when that very same chat has been the subject of safeguarding allegations regarding poor supervision and sending kids to unsupervised discord servers? 2/ Could you also explain why you are doing this in the middle of a @ChtyCommission investigation into Mermaids? You have no idea what the outcome will be. If the investigation concludes Mermaids poses a risk to children you will have been complicit in exposing them to harm.
Feb 4 • 9 tweets • 3 min read
1/ I'll be appearing on Andrew Doyle's show tonight on GB News at 8:30 to speak about Gill's hard work in revealing the @CPSUK not only conducted secret meetings with Mermaids and Stonewall, but said to the ICO it could cause issues for both if their involvement was made public 2/ This is in the context of the "sex by deception" consultation which was a plan by the CPS *not* to prosecute people they thought were convincingly "living as man/woman" (even though such is irrelevant to deception). I've spoken about it before.

Jan 26 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
1/ While the apology is no doubt welcome, there's something of the hostage statement to this and some glaring omissions. It's an apology after than before a damning judgment with no mention that the OU broke their own internal anti-bullying training re pile ons and boycotts 2/ Nothing in this statement to the effect that GC views are protected at law and the OU singularly failed to protect an employee set upon by a mob which is likely to conceal the plain fact that the institution was too scared to act against bullying trans activist staff