1/ A betrayal that would make Judas blush. The anti-gay @stonewalluk maintain their open door privileged access to the seat of power in the UK, and they complain that the Supreme Court says homosexual means same sex attraction and lesbians can form their own associations.
2/ They claim the state has re-designated sexual orientation, but conveniently forget they are guilty of precisely that crime when they tried to re-define homosexuality as "same gender" attraction (but note, not for straight people). This is from their glossary.

1/ The gender elites aren't cut out for brinksmanship. Liverpool Pride ended their sponsor relationship with Barclays Bank over a row in which BB said they would obey the Supreme Court ruling. They were counting on BB to buckle, but they didn't reckon with commercial reality.
2/ Barclays, faced with a choice between "pay enormous sums in damages for breaking the law" and "keep a bunch of idiotic gendocrats happy" obviously chose the former, they were always going to, and only their foolish opponents would think the rule of law was somehow optional.

1/ There are no TRAs - there is only political transvestism.

You cannot change sex, there is no Trans from one to the other.

There is no “right” to chemically castrate autistic lesbians and gay boys.

There is no activism when government, unions and companies indulge you. 2/ The whole thing is a fraud. A mimic. A unconvincing wig and makeup that doesn’t “pass”

There is only the politics of a transvestite that says women’s clothes worn by men

Have more rights than women wearing those clothes

This is an aesthetic and counter enlightenment creed

1/ An arch gendocrat ministers to the great unwashed from her literary festival with its gender neutral toilets and laments that we can’t find a sensible middle ground on rapists in women’s prisons, chemical castrated gay boys, mutilated autistic lesbians

theguardian.com/law/2025/may/2… 2/ This embodiment of privilege who expresses her dissent in spider broaches sits in a web the deep woke establishment and calls upon her under privileged lesbian daughter, the chair of the stock exchange to lament the fact more transvestite men are not on company boards

1/ Hello and welcome to BBC Villify, the entirely neutral show where we ask lesbians "how do you terfs sleep at night?", we're joined today by Kate Barker, CEO of the LGB Alliance

Kate: "Hello"

BBC Drone: "Do you understand some of our viewers will find that offensive?"

https://twitter.com/JournalismSEEN/status/1924402945547730968

2/

Kate: "We were elated at the Supreme Court Judgment, had the Scottish Government won, the protected characteristic of same sex orientation would be rendered meaningless, as it says at para 206 of the judgment"

BBC Drone: "Have you considered how sad transvestites feel?"

1/ Persons and organisations aggrieved by a Supreme Court ruling that protects women and gay rights are now actively weaponsing suicide narratives as a political expedient. Our National Independent Advisor, Professor Appleby is now routinely forced to ask them to desist. 2/ As Professor Appleby has repeatedly pointed out, what they are doing is extremely dangerous and highly irresponsible. This is because suicide can work as a contagion and linking it to particular political causes can result in a cause and effect relationship.

1/ Hello and welcome to the a neutral BBC show in which we discuss "Are terfs complete scum?". In this episode, we'll begin crossing live to a terribly sad transvestite (TST) who cannot play in women's sport because of evil terfs. I began with the question "are terfs evil?" 2/ TST: "Yes"

BBC Drone "How evil would you say they are?"

TST: "Very"

BBC Drone: "For balance, some of the evil terfs say women have higher injury risk when massive blokes calling themselves "Barbara" play sport, is there an epidemic of transphobia?"

TST: "Yes"

1/ Resilient civil rights movements are forged in adversity, this gives them substance and agility. Political Transvestitism had no section 28 or unequal pay between sexes, so it has no hinterland, gains were secured in secret or by circumventing public consent in Goodwin v UK. 2/ This is why the response to the Supreme Court has been immature and ineffective. Political Transvestitism refuses to stand on its own two high heels because it has never had to, so it pivots to faux rapid onset butch lesbian concern or offensive comparisons with the holocaust.

1/ This is getting silly. The Supreme Court was concerned with a point of statutory construction, it was not coming to a policy decision with stakeholder engagement. The Scottish Government and Amnesty were there to argue the case that the SSO PC should be rendered "meaningless".

https://twitter.com/DisRightsUK/status/1912868552807256268

2/ The Court observed well known rules around intervenors and no complaint was made at the time that it was missing some vital countervailing submission. To suggest the court "excluded" anyone wrongly is scurrilous, unserious and contrary to the interests of a rule of law society

1/ Questions the BBC are not asking of any guests on the Supreme Court Ruling:

"If The Scottish Government won, a "trans man" could be lawfully sacked for breastfeeding or becoming pregnant, isn't "trans activism" therefore too focused on "trans women?" 2/

"If the Scottish Government won, the Supreme Court said the "same sex attraction protected characteristic" that protects lesbians and gay men would become "meaningless", isn't that homophobic?"

1/ Helen Joyce often says single sex spaces for women matter for privacy, dignity and security. I would add only that for homosexuals, single sex spaces matter for our happiness, our shared bonds, our political activism. Our passions, our marriages are single sex spaces. 2/ The Scottish Government attempted no less than an audacious heist of fundamental gay fights. Had they won there would be no such thing as a lesbian or gay man in law, because the very category of people we are would have been divided. That has serious consequences.

1/ Victory is a difficult thing to trust, and any gender war veteran will be well versed in false dawns, each tribunal often prompts the refrain "surely this will be the last one? surely they'll get it now". But the Supreme Court is different. This is the beginning of the end. 2/ Gender falls in 3 stages. The flight of the cowards. The howl of the zealots. The prosecution of the monsters. The cowards have flown. The zealots have howled. We're firmly in stage 3 in the UK and the reckoning for the mutilators Douglas Murray spoke about now beckons.

1/ Stonewall and their friend in Government need to think carefully about this proposal.

Because it risks some rapists not getting rape convictions if they target lesbians. Instead they’ll get off with a “conversion practice offence” without the life sentence. 2/ In criminal law we have the “rule against duplicity”. This means one act cannot be double indicted as two offences. That means the CPS would have to choose only one the case of a lesbian victim whether they went for a rape prosecution or this new offence Stonewall want.

1/ The single worst thing about political transvestism is it taught a generation of children there was nothing beyond the self. Where they should have looked outwards and experienced this wonderful planet, they looked inwards and meditated on the false god of “gender”. 2/ Fighting political transvestism we bemoan that we so often state the obvious. “He’s a bloody man” we endlessly say as sports trophies are stolen, bearded rapists are called “she” and obviously troubled children are pumped full of quite obviously dangerous drugs for profit.

1/ It is shocking to me that a Labour MP thinks getting an injunction is a "quick answer" for a concerned family member desperately trying to stop a wrongful suicide procured by coercion. Let me tell you how "quick" injunctive relief actually is, especially if you are poor.

https://twitter.com/RightToLifeUK/status/1899784037423624272

2/ In the first place. If you are an everyday person unfamiliar with equitable legal remedies (which is most people), you will have no idea what an injunction is. You will rely on the new "death panels" where you cannot appeal if suicide is authorised but you can otherwise.

1/ The NHS plainly considers itself a parallel political centre of power much as the Church long ago. It now openly defies ministers, (labour or conservative), presumably because it claims moral authority over Secretaries of State.

telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/03/0… 2/ This is a recurring theme in Western democracies. Where Victorians had philanthropist pushing for the end of child labour, our modern “third sector”, believing itself to be virtuous all but wishes to abolish the very concert of “woman”. This is dangerous.

1/ No one actually believes it. The question “do you believe TW are woman” is a political device which does the following:

- It says the concept of woman is negotiable and tells you what is up for debate

- It says “how much will you suspend reality for political expedience”

https://twitter.com/lucyhunterb/status/1894897182550946063

2/ Continued…..

- It satisfies a post religious urge to measure virtue against “belief” - this was always the most important word in the question and, properly construed, politicians are faith tested and asked if they are true believers

1/ Stonewall were never slow to baselessly accuse enemies of being in receipt of shadowy US funding, sometimes directly, sometimes via media outrunners like the Good Laugh Project. Mermaids did this too. Yet now we know the truth. This is quite serious.

https://twitter.com/JournalismSEEN/status/1893788836263579841

2/ The effect of this funding was to distort UK political discourse at the highest levels presenting ministers with outright lies. You can see the former in the "just a bit of admin" lie re GRCs and the latter in Ruth Hunt lies about puberty blockers

https://x.com/SexMattersOrg/status/1788932363398910373

1/ NHS Fife demonstrates the vast & enduring institutional power of political travestitism, you cross this force, and it's doesn't matter if you're a nurse with decades and decades of unblemished public service, you will face confected hurts and institutional wrath like no other. 2/ Political tranvestitism is an inorganic, top/down force well used to power and influence, so it luxuriates (often absurdly) when on public show, for it has no sense whatsoever of how absurd it is. This is a movement characterised by boys no one ever said the word "no" to.

1/ The modern body politic lies at the end of the long road to solipsism, if you want to understand the present moment, you have to understand principally that Western societies endlessly meditate on the self and the only political unit in town is the individual. And it's lonely. 2/ This all started a long time ago. Fad diets. Gym memberships to achieve bodies measured against pornographic aesthetics. The normalisation of the therapist. The primacy of individual lived experience. And then the information revolution that catalysed it all into outright war.

1/ The gender borg have every right to be furious with @stonewalluk for sneakily ditching their belief in gender identity in their new definition of transphobia. Political transvestitism holds that men in dresses have soul-like female gender identities - Stonewall now denies this
2/ Stonewall used to believe gender identity existed and that enforcing the reassessment of Allison Bailey, the cancellation of any number of women, the harassment of James Dreyfus was justified in the name of the new religion of gender identity. Yet now they abandon it.