Shri Chilkur Balaji Deity Koorma Form July 18th SC Judgement quotation part of Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute
"In adharma flowing frm wrong decision in a Court of law, one fourth each is attributed to the person committing the adharma, witness, the judges& the ruler"
The #SengolAtParliament reminds us of the practical truth of above statement from the story of Kannagi
The Hon'ble President and Hon'ble MPs who constitute Parliament cannot thus be powerless when Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute is raised to correct through Art 143 ref
Sengol in Parliament does bend when SC violates dharma by infringing on Rama Rajya pious purpose protected in Shri Rama Raja Deity Rights in our Constitutional Rama Rajya and when Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute arises duty of Hon'ble President & Hon'ble MPs to correct
Hon'ble former President in response to the letters from several Hon'ble MPs did refer Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute to officials thus both did their constitutional duty arising from Constitutional Rama Rajya Oath to correct SC violation of Dharma thru Art 143 ref
"The note of humility means the unimportance of the individual & the supreme importance of the unfolding purpose which we are called upon to serve" It is this lack of humility in officials for what Sengol represents that made them ignore guidance to seek Hon'ble former CJI advise
The draft Art 143 reference should have been finalized after securing guidance of Hon'ble former CJI Justice Venkatachaliah ji but this was blocked by wrong opinion of the officials..we explained how Para 12, 13 & 14 has been conveyed strongly to SC
Para 15 question under draft Art 143 reference in Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute wrongly blocked by officials is now crystal clear as the right answer to the question framed is also available through devotion of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community
We therefore request Hon'ble PM Shri @narendramodi ji who installed Sengol in the Parliament to recognize the error of the officials in blocking Art 143 ref in Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute and ask Hon'ble AG to rectify this u Order 27A Rule 1
Even today the violation of Rama Rajya pious purpose that Sengol represents is remembered for thousands of years every year in the land of Shri Padmanabha in Goddess Kannagi temple can be highlighted by devout people who secured promise of Hon'ble PM
Anyone w basic constitutional gyan will tell that Deities have constitutionally established through Art 363 dispute that SC cannot interpret Constitution saying Deity is not a person u Part III as done in Sabarimala what is left is for Hon'ble AGs to guide
The Sengol that is installed in Parliament is actually bent and will be so till Sabarimala wrong interpretation that Deity is not person u Part III is corrected by having Hon'ble AGs guide SC on the right interpretation secured through devotion of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community
Many Kingdoms w sovereignty of Deity merged to form Bharat with Constitutional Rama Rajya where Shri Rama Raja Deity Rights preserves Rama Rajya pious purpose that Sengol represents for those who doubt this interpretation have to only look at Pakistan Objectives resolution & comp
"The Gods have a keen desire to be born in sacred land of Bharat" Constituent Assembly sentiment..
Let us acknowledge the victory of dharma in a proper constitutional procedure of Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute and get SC interpretation aligned through Hon'ble AGs
Having installed Sengol in Parliament let us work to make it erect for well-being of our Nation by correcting the wrong Sabarimala interpretation that Deity is not a person u Part III which is in violation of Rama Rajya pious purpose that Sengol represents
In👇thread we explain how April 18th 2019 Sabarimala genuine promise blocked by officials 90% fulfilled by Shri Rama Om Vashat Karaya Namaha 🙏 Himself...the defined promise for devout politicians for rest 10% work is same as Art 84(A) Constitutional Oath
Unfulfilled 10% Sabarimala promise is spirit of above Art 84 (A) Oath for all devout politicians across political spectrum who belong to Shri Rama Parivar Art 26 धार्मिक सम्प्रदाय (Hindi version of Constitution) Ramayana defn "राज्यं च वयं च रामस्य धर्मं वक्तुमिहार्हसि"
"If elected by grace of Shri Rama I will preserve protect and defend Shri Rama Embodiment of Dharma definition of Constitutional Morality (Dharma) and ensure Sabarimala is reheard and correct Hon'ble SC Judges definition"
It is only through true faith and allegiance to Constitutional Morality (Dharma) definition of Shri Rama Embodiment of Dharma as against wrong definition in SC ZERO Deity Rights judgement that Sovereignty and Integrity of Bharat can be secured
We have always wondered what is the significance of July 18th in the draft notification to resolve Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute...
Indian Independence Act came into force on July 18th 1947 and it is now clear the SC violated legal limit
Eka Shila Shri Chilkur Balaji SreeDevi Bhoomi Devi Swamyambhu Deity represents the natural Rama Rajya Sovereignty of Dharma right of this ancient sacred land worshipped in the form of Bhoomi Devi Deity and recognized as 👆 legal limit to Constituent Power of law making
Shri Thanthri Padmanabha Swamy temple explains the connection between Thrippadidanam and above legal limit to Constituent power of law making
Post Jan 22 2024 Constitutional Pranaprathishta
Shri Ramlala Sarkar Art 26 & Art 363 Deity rights legal limit to Constituent Power of law making protects
Sabarimala Deity Right to be Worshipped inclusive of Devotees' Group Right to perform duty of worship & please Deity
HH Saantananda Maharshi Swamiji historic letter connects April 18th 2019 Sabarimala promise of Hon'ble PM Shri @narendramodi ji and Jan 22 2024 Constitutional Pranaprathisha which fulfills it by grace of Guru even though wrong official opinion blocked it.
How Shri Rama Raja Deity of Orchha revealed Himself as Ruler u Art 363 (2)(b) when historic Digvijay yatra of Swamiji referred to in the above letter which started from Ayodhya turned back towards Ayodhya
Bharat : India 2.0 Art 26 interpretation (we hope to get SC to follow through Order 27A Rule 1) that protects Rama Rajya natural right of Bhumi Devi has been secured through devotion of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal (SC) community to which Milind Makwana belongs americankahani.com/perspectives/i…
"Our neighbors included a priest& Vedic astrologer. While both were members of what some would deem India’s “upper” or “dominant” castes, we were all in same socio-economic boat We didn’t think of them as superior nor did they think of us as inferior" Thank you for speaking truth twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
We are proud of devotion of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community without which Bharat would have lost Art 26 Rama Rajya protected in Deity Rights and we hope the Govt will respond to our request to honor Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community through Bharat Ratna for Hon'ble former President
Having installed Sengol in Parliament let us work to make it erect for well-being of our Nation by correcting the wrong Sabarimala interpretation that Deity is not a person u Part III which is in violation of Rama Rajya pious purpose that Sengol represents
"Shri Parameshwarji Eklingji Maharaj is the Sovereign of Mewar, and Shriji as His sole representative shall exercise on His behalf all rights, authority & jurisdiction." From Mewar Constitution
Sovereignty of Dharma basic structure of Bharat Constitution
"Dharma, righteousness, is king of kings Dharmam Kshatrasya Kshatram It is ruler of both people & the Rulers themselves It is sovereignty of the law which we have asserted" Dr Radhakrishnan defining Bharat's Objectives resolution when we comp with Pakistan 👆
Sengol ritual of 14th Aug 1947 and how Rajaji who played integral part understood it with Shri Rama as Embodiment of Dharma in effect attaches Dr Radhakrishnan's definition of Objectives Resolution of Bharat to resoln body & then we compare with Pakistan
"Dharma, righteousness, is king of kings Dharmam Kshatrasya Kshatram It is ruler of both people & the Rulers themselves It is sovereignty of the law which we have asserted" this defn of Dr Radhakrishnan merger of Deity Kingdoms to form Bharat make sense
“Maharaja Chitra Tirunal Balarama Varma who was by tradition ruling on behalf of Absolute, brought Constitution of India into operation in Travancore with the consent of Deity Padmanabha Swamy after being promised goal of Rama Rajya” makes sense