_Esc Profile picture
Jun 5, 2023 37 tweets 16 min read Read on X
1/ On the 13 January 2023, the Independent review of the UK's Net Zero was released in its final form.

Thing is - it's not terrible independent as far as I can tell. ImageImage
2/ Acknowledgements are here. A whole range of people contributed.

Let's go through them, because I've failed to find anyone who could possibly claim they were 'independent'.

They're either government lackeys, or they're 'sustainable' acolytes.

assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl… Image
3/ Ryan McLaughlin
linkedin.com/in/ryan-mclaug… Image
4/ Lee McDonough
gov.uk/government/org… Image
5/ … in addition to…

Adam Kerson
linkedin.com/in/adam-kerson… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… Image
6/ Amber Woodward
linkedin.com/in/amber-woodw… Image
7/ Barnaby Powell
linkedin.com/in/barnaby-pow… Image
10/ Harry Robinson
linkedin.com/in/harry-robin… Image
15/ Julie Damborg
linkedin.com/in/julie-dambo… Image
18/ Massimiliano Verri
linkedin.com/in/massimilian… Image
20/ Olivia Johnson
linkedin.com/in/oliviaj/ Image
22/ Swapna Uddin
linkedin.com/in/swapnauddin/ Image
23/ Theresa Löber
linkedin.com/in/theresa-l%C… Image
24/ Verena Leckebusch
linkedin.com/in/verena-leck… Image
25/ … repeated engagement…

Josh Buckland
linkedin.com/in/joshua-buck… Image
28/ Lord Deben
theccc.org.uk/about/ Image
30/ Charlie Ogilvie
linkedin.com/in/charlotte-o… Image
31/ Sir Patrick Vallance
gov.uk/government/peo… Image
32/ Lord Nicholas Stern
lse.ac.uk/granthaminstit… Image
33/ Michael Liebreich
linkedin.com/in/mliebreich/ Image
34/ Amber Rudd
gov.uk/government/peo… Image
35/ Claire O’Neill.
wbcsd.org/Overview/About… Image
36/ Eagle eyed will notice two names left out

Louis Maskery - appears very young chap, very little on the internet to find, and

Magdalena Lomacka - who I suspect has changed surname, but as I cannot prove this, I won't link her.

I guess it'd have to be one of those two.
37/ Of course, the alternative explanation is that they "forgot" to ask any dissenter for his or her opinion.

You know, sort of like they did wrt to the Covid narrative.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with _Esc

_Esc Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @_Escapekey_

Jun 19
1909. And amazingly aligned, too.

But that's just the start. Image
I kid you not this is another book of his Image
... of course, a moral economy based in 'one world' needs aligned around value.

and here's a general theory he wrote in that regard. Image
Read 28 tweets
May 15
Still haven't found the full text in a second document, but there's plenty of references to it.

Here's from 'Fabian Freeway', 1966.

Image
... oh - there it is.

so the document is real.

has its authenticity been denied, that it's somehow not related to the PEP/Fabian Parasites?

congress.gov/73/crecb/1934/…Image
Read 11 tweets
Apr 27
RAND, OECD, IIASA, Macy/Pugwash conferences, Cambridge Apostles, WOMP, technocracy inc/LID, vatican 2, integral humanism (maritain)... I could cover these topics, but I don't see the point because they all just strengthen my case. there are no internal contradictions. Image
i have covered health, environment, finance, governance, systems theory, role of ethics, cultural engineering, aesopian language, global governance, digital twins, digital id, CBDCs, carbon accounting, bogdanov, dug up documents which essentially no-one else has covered... Image
i think, in short, im done because i dont fundamentally see any major developments which even could change the overall arc of my theory. absolutely everything is logically coherent, and there can't really be any reason but one - because it's all true. Image
Read 5 tweets
Apr 27
There were four separate hearings on this topic. Four. On an allegedly technical issue.

I struggle to find similar examples.

And the ground work was laid over here.

In 1958 they discussed the conceptual aspects, nearly completed it, even.

the call for global data, harmonious standards and so forth came at the 1968 unesco biosphere conference - data, which would lead into the global information database called for shortly before JFKs death

Read 37 tweets
Apr 26
They wanted to create a National Research Data Processing and Information Retrieval Center

Here's the hearings from 1963. JFK was hesitant about this - LBJ supported it. Image
you know what's weird. I ask chatgpt for summaries and it answers with some weird, scripted reply which makes no sense in context of my question.

and now it even flat out refuses Image
Read 26 tweets
Apr 26
You don't say, Grok. Image
HAHAHAHAHA and after accusing it of carrying water for the establishment it suddenly CAN find evidence of my original claim

holy fucking shit this is corrupt Image
calling it out in that regard and it owns up.

this is just so breathtakingly dishonest. the AI called me a 'conspiracy theorist' for stating what's obviously true, and has now done a full reversal and apologised

most people will not challenge it but just accept its word Image
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(