RAND, OECD, IIASA, Macy/Pugwash conferences, Cambridge Apostles, WOMP, technocracy inc/LID, vatican 2, integral humanism (maritain)... I could cover these topics, but I don't see the point because they all just strengthen my case. there are no internal contradictions.
i have covered health, environment, finance, governance, systems theory, role of ethics, cultural engineering, aesopian language, global governance, digital twins, digital id, CBDCs, carbon accounting, bogdanov, dug up documents which essentially no-one else has covered...
i think, in short, im done because i dont fundamentally see any major developments which even could change the overall arc of my theory. absolutely everything is logically coherent, and there can't really be any reason but one - because it's all true.
the call for global data, harmonious standards and so forth came at the 1968 unesco biosphere conference - data, which would lead into the global information database called for shortly before JFKs death
HAHAHAHAHA and after accusing it of carrying water for the establishment it suddenly CAN find evidence of my original claim
holy fucking shit this is corrupt
calling it out in that regard and it owns up.
this is just so breathtakingly dishonest. the AI called me a 'conspiracy theorist' for stating what's obviously true, and has now done a full reversal and apologised
most people will not challenge it but just accept its word