Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
_Esc Profile picture
_Esc
@_Escapekey_
Nostr: npub163qkm74rq9eyhcskc3kre6rdysnjugx89cfhpx2s3du6t6qzz76sh0pmhk The price of Twitter Speech is eternal censorship. Telegram: https://t.co/aeF8iVQrgH
16 subscribers
Jun 19 • 28 tweets • 10 min read
1909. And amazingly aligned, too.

But that's just the start. Image I kid you not this is another book of his Image
May 15 • 11 tweets • 4 min read
Still haven't found the full text in a second document, but there's plenty of references to it.

Here's from 'Fabian Freeway', 1966.

Image link

archive.org/details/Fabian…
Apr 27 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
RAND, OECD, IIASA, Macy/Pugwash conferences, Cambridge Apostles, WOMP, technocracy inc/LID, vatican 2, integral humanism (maritain)... I could cover these topics, but I don't see the point because they all just strengthen my case. there are no internal contradictions. Image i have covered health, environment, finance, governance, systems theory, role of ethics, cultural engineering, aesopian language, global governance, digital twins, digital id, CBDCs, carbon accounting, bogdanov, dug up documents which essentially no-one else has covered... Image
Apr 27 • 37 tweets • 14 min read
There were four separate hearings on this topic. Four. On an allegedly technical issue.

I struggle to find similar examples.

And the ground work was laid over here.

In 1958 they discussed the conceptual aspects, nearly completed it, even.

Apr 26 • 26 tweets • 7 min read
They wanted to create a National Research Data Processing and Information Retrieval Center

Here's the hearings from 1963. JFK was hesitant about this - LBJ supported it. Image here

books.google.co.uk/books?id=bGtQA…
Apr 26 • 11 tweets • 4 min read
You don't say, Grok. Image HAHAHAHAHA and after accusing it of carrying water for the establishment it suddenly CAN find evidence of my original claim

holy fucking shit this is corrupt Image
Apr 26 • 39 tweets • 14 min read
This document is absolutely chock full of the meticulous input-output analysis I've been documenting as of late.

It began within the DoD (McNamara in 1961), but was begun under LBJ in August, 1965 - and soon began to comprise ALL types of traceable data under OECD. Image What began with tracing just economic inputs and outputs soon evolved into education, public health, urban services, land-use planning, and - environmentalism.

archive.org/details/Goulds…
Apr 24 • 29 tweets • 5 min read
When the May 23, 1972 US-USSR environmental agreement was signed, the entire intelligence apparatus had already been reoriented to make this convergence possible.

And Robert Amory, Jr, was pivotal in that strategic shift. No wonder Schlesinger tried to protect him. Amory, essentially, pushed for the capacity for forward prediction - exactly what RAND worked on, and Leontief had (allegedly) fathered starting in 1941.

JFK dismissing him must have been a serious setback.
Apr 20 • 10 tweets • 3 min read
Guess the year.

"There is great need for a “ Declaration of Interdependence ” between plants, animals, and their environment. These things are all parts of the same great unit system of matter and energy." Image Those who put down "1936" - well done. Image
Apr 18 • 36 tweets • 10 min read
Oh look, there he is again. Image oddly prophetic Image
Apr 16 • 10 tweets • 5 min read
I still want to know how the VOOP managed to survive Stalin. Practically every other CSO was shut down. Not VOOP. And that, in spite, of its often provocative, outspoken nature - the sort which frequently led to a one-way ticket to the gulag. Image ... if I can just find one bit of evidence, I can synthesise my two disparate timelines; pre-1960, and that of globe environmental governance

en.kremlin.ru/events/preside…
Apr 14 • 15 tweets • 6 min read
Reading Brzezinski's 'Between Two Ages', and...

First first step is the Trilateral Commission, and the second step is Perestroika... no? Image .... computer says... yes. Image
Apr 8 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
The 'New World Order' is, step by step, implementing the same public-private-third party framework everywhere, with the General Consultative Status NGOs in charge of the United Nations.

Subsidiarity / Institutional Mediation (network coordination) Image Forgot to add a few. Just need to do write-ups on the final few, then I really do struggle to see what else I can do to cement the case. Image
Apr 3 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
Now, why would the billionaire class be on a mad spree, purchasing 'natural assets' on a large scale?

(UNEP GEO6; 'A Long-Term Vision for 2050)

... and do note that the governance and means of implementation go both up and down... like... say... an inductor? Image OMFG what the planned, permanent rentier class has invented is sort of quasi-synthetic feudalism.

because the carbon emission is... the NEGATIVE of the yield on sequestration.
Mar 21 • 62 tweets • 20 min read
technocracy gives it away on page 50:

we cannot change human nature, and human organisation is immanent, founded on the basis of economic traits

so while we cannot change the organisation directly, this organisation WILL change, should we change the economic traits Image technocracy is, in brief, represents nothing short of crass marxist ideology in drag.

except, neither is the origin. at least, that's my take.
Mar 19 • 12 tweets • 5 min read
I sit on several documents at the moment which... are just unbelievable. Believable, because they tie everything together, but unbelievable, that they were ever allowed published.

What we presently experience is so obviously engineered. All of it. Here's one - the American Defense knew that the (absurdly biased) 'Nuclear Winter' study was being exploited.

And Moiseev worked on that, Soviet side.

archive.org/details/DTIC_A…Image
Mar 18 • 13 tweets • 5 min read
Bada-bing bada-boom, there it is.

There's the trading currency later outlined through Technocracy, Inc, and Positive Money.

One hell of a tedious chapter, but there it is.

Image Its just so incredible dishonest, what they do.

We have a 'consensus national objective' through politicians and elections. What this, essentially, outlines is a 'third way', where 'scientists' control the 'national objective' aka 'common good'.

They're scientific socialists. Image
Mar 17 • 19 tweets • 9 min read
Best as I sit and work my way through the Technocracy doc, it suddenly strikes me how they've progressively rolled out their plans for world domination, because this material... essentially reflects the same core ideas as Marx. It's just established differently.

>continues Image Socialism is about an organisation
Communism is that, focusing on material aspects
Technocracy adds empirical monitoring and administration
This leads to a purpose - co2 - and the ‘circular economy’
And environmentalism is the embodiment of that

>>yes. Image
Image
Image
Mar 16 • 8 tweets • 4 min read
Right, let me connect global governance to the technocracy, then the carbon dioxide obsession and then environmentalism, and then back to finance (which goes back to the central banks).

Most of this I've sourced on substack already.

Global governance links technocracy. Image From Technocracy we get to carbon dioxide obsession via Hubbert and Plass/Keeling (with note of Bogdanov and Gaia). Image
Mar 16 • 4 tweets • 2 min read
This aligns impeccably with:
- Technocracy, Inc (1936)
- International Research Council (ICSU)
- Leo Woolf's International Government
- Carbon emission permit/sequestration backed CBDCs
- The Third Way
- Marx's take on money

I think we have a winner.

Image We have a winner. Image
Mar 10 • 13 tweets • 5 min read
This book is arguably the birth of the modern global financial system.

Socialism and the capitalist social order, Julius Wolf, 1892.

Public-Private Cooperation (through Bernstein+Woolf led to League of Nations/UN) and The Gold Clearing Mechanism (led to the BIS). Image here, have a link.

books.google.ru/books?id=ypAZA…