Watched #ShinyHappyPeople. It’s worth checking out, if you haven’t already.
Plenty has already been said about the authoritarianism and subjugation of people we see within that flavor of Christianity.
I would only add to the conversation that NONE OF THAT WAS SURPRISING to me, given what I know about *another* Duggar.
Do you know John W. Duggar, great uncle of Jim Bob Duggar?
Let me introduce you to him.
Before I do, let me acknowledge that I don’t know how Jim Bob and Michelle feel about John.
Guilt-by-association is unfair, especially when you can’t choose your association - as in the case of sharing a family name.
In this article, Jim Bob does seem to have some admiration for his great uncle as he tours @BMASeminary - a seminary with a deep and long-standing relationship with John.
John helped launch the BMA seminary. He served as President of the seminary for 10 years. And there are areas of the seminary today that bear his name. You can find some of that history here. bmats.edu/history/
But that 2009 article is all I know of how Jim Bob feels about John. It’s possible Jim Bob disagrees with John, would disavow John’s teachings, or is otherwise embarrassed by his great uncle.
My only point is that none of the authoritarian impulses or the subjugation of others (in the name of Christ, no less) we see in Gothard & Duggar circles was surprising to me, knowing what I know about another Duggars - John W. in particular.
In 1954, John wrote a book, “God’s Answer to Segregation.”
And it is vile.
If you’re keeping score at home, 1954 is the same year that Brown vs. Topeka made segregation in public schools unconstitutional. And it’s just 3 years before the Little Rock school crisis in 1957 and the subsequent Lost Year in 1958.
John’s book was not insignificant. There were segments of very vocal and active (and sometimes violent) Christians who opposed integration in the strongest of terms. And many (if not most) were aware of, influenced by, and/or emboldened by Duggar’s book.
The book is as abhorrent as you might be able to imagine. But if you want/need a taste, here are just a few passages. Be warned. They are awful.
A few more.
I don’t really know the point of this thread that has gotten too long by now. Except maybe to say none of the show was surprising and that I think it’s healthy when we as Christians collectively confront and own our dark histories. And I think we still have more of that to do.
We are at our worst when we lead through fear-mongering and power and shame. #ShinyHappyPeople is just one more example of that.
Addendum: @scott_m_coley wrote a great article showing how authoritarian theology connects both racism & patriarchy. I think his previous website is offline while he works on a forth-coming book. But its on Wayback Machine and definitely worth a look.
This is so tiresome. But because there is *still* some local controversy over CRT and wokeness (fueled mostly by pseudo intellectuals whose expertise is in making strawman arguments), here’s my 2 cents.
When I was still at a local college, a parent of a prospective student contacted our admin. Said she was against CRT and wanted to know where we stood on it. The admin asked me for a response. So here’s how I answered. (Pardon the typos.)
I start with a comparison to Freudian psychology - another often controversial subject matter in conservative evangelical circles.
PSA: If you can encourage a Primary Care physician or nurse, do it. Burnout is at critical levels. Some tidbits from an article in the latest JAMA issue:
"Over the past 2 years, more than 36,000 survey responses from clinicians across the country have painted an alarming picture of a workforce that's increasingly burned out, traumatized, anxious, and depressed."
"For many clinician the workplace challenges--ranging from high stress and burnout to understaffing and reduced income, often in combination--have become insurmountable."
Let's start with this one: Why can't we get past the headline before reading about DV victims being "tempted?" Temptation leads to sin - and so from the very beginning of the article, we are getting echoes of victim-blaming. If she doesn't seek help, it's probably her fault.
Does this seem off? We are already looking to understand the "controlling husband." And is it a deflection to talk about "the anger in the household" rather than, say, "the severe and uncontrolled anger of her husband" instead?
Periodic reminder: your college classes aren't doing you any favors if you are never challenged or offended by them. We aren't here to protect your bubble. This isn't VBS. It's boot camp.
"The student who is simply conditioned to respond in certain ways to certain stimuli is at a loss when he confronts novel situations, as he will in a changing society undergoing a knowledge explosion."
"He needs a disciplined understanding of his heritage plus creativity, logical rigor and self-critical honesty, far more than he needs prepackaged sets of questions and answers."
As you study the Old Testament, you see God’s people caught in a cycle. I’ve heard it described as one of rebellion, retribution, repentance, and restoration. It happens over and over and over.
God’s people keep forgetting. They keep going back to old ways. They keep returning to idol worship and self-determinism and a whole host of bad choices.
It’s almost like this is the 4,000-year object lesson. God’s people have to repeat this cycle for generation after generation to truly learn this: Left on their own, they will mess it all up.
Among the many concerns I have had (and continue to have) about @theaacc, this one may not be as serious. But it still speaks to the integrity and trustworthiness of the organization. The advertising for the new "Care and Counsel Bible" has been misleading, at best.
@theaacc Even though I already owned the "Soul Care Bible" printed in 2001, I ordered the new "Care and Counsel Bible" just printed this year. I told that story here: