A woman has to decide whether she's going to partner up with a man and be the best housewife she can be so she will get provided for OR accept she will be working long hours and grinding corporate for the rest of her life. Failure to be good at either is what results in poverty.
Now of course some insecure woman with trust issues is going to come along and say "what if I'm a good wife and he leaves me anyway"
You're missing the point. Corporate can fire you and make life hard too. The point is you have to pick a path, specialise in it and be good at it.
If you don't have the intellect, energy levels and stress tolerance (low enough neuroticism) to be competent in leadership capacities, you're temperamentally not cut out for full-time, high order complexity work. This is most women. If that's you, fine, nothing to be ashamed of.
In that case you're better suited to being in the home and finding a man who's all the things you're not (predominantly: high energy and high stress tolerance) - because these are the traits that make a good provider, and you lack those traits, so won't provide well for yourself.
The problem is when you're temperamentally not suited to high corporate level achievement, BUT ALSO are not temperamentally well suited to being a good wife and serving your husband.
This is how you end up old, alone, and poor with no insurance plan.
I am not being dramatic.
A woman who lacks the traits to have a successful career but also lacks the traits to be a good wife has nothing of value to anyone. She will either fail to marry or end up divorced, and she will struggle to survive on whatever low wage she is capable of earning.
So, in a nutshell, if you're a high IQ, high energy, not too neurotic woman, and you don't really trust men or for whatever reason have grand ambitions, a career is an option for you and can pan out (no poverty) but for the vast majority of women, marriage is the superior option.
"Why can't I do both?"
You can, but you'll excel at neither as family gets in the way of work and work gets in the way of family.
And the best men won't opt for a woman who's always stressed from work and too tired to cook and clean when he can just have a fully dedicated wife.
If you enjoyed this thread, please consider subscribing to my email list at follow.tellyoursonthis.com to be kept up-to-date with all my latest content.
Thank you.
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
One of the greatest differences between a man and a woman, is when a man trains a woman to be exactly what he wants her to be, he loves her more for becoming his ideal, but when a woman trains a man to be exactly what she thinks she wants him to be, she loses respect for him, then disposes of him.
This is the difference between knowing what you want and leading, and falsely thinking you know what you want - and misleading.
Men are architects, women are saboteurs - even of their own dreams
Because to be an architect requires clarity of thought, vision and ambition in alignment.
And women, as the chaos bringing rather than order generating principle are incapable of that consistency
Unfit to lead.
This is why if a woman trusts her judgement more than she trusts yours - you have no business attempting to create anything with her
She is either so foolish she truly believes her judgement is on par with, if not superior to yours
A manβs vulnerability is sort of like spiritual porn to a woman, they get off to the connection, but feel disgusted in the aftermath. Itβs the desire for authenticity and connectivity (with the man) without the capacity to take responsibility for the full weight of his feelings.
Like you know how a young guy with no wisdom or maturity wants to have sex with the cute young girl, but canβt really handle the full weight of looking after?
Same here. Women want full spectrum shared spiritual emotional connection.
But canβt handle a man who breaks polarity.
Vulnerability outside the context of βI went through some bad shit and I conquered itβ or βIβm going through some bad shit but donβt worry Iβm a fucking warrior and will conquer all of itβ results in a polarity break. Loss of confidence? Polarity break. Despair? Polarity break.
Funniest thing about regular women is they call you evil when you give actual wisdom derived insight/ metaphysical analysis because their fragile egos can't appreciate nuance or handle the implications.
But if you sabotage them with ego affirmations they believe unquestioningly.
Which is actually why evil is more permeating and pervasive and the default and "stays winning"
Because it takes less skill, and there's less resistance to it
It literally takes 10x the skill to be a good, strong but ruthless man than just a straight up predator
And the thing is, all good men - in the real sense of the word - as in, could fuck your shit up and exploit you maximally against your best interest for their self-interest *BUT DOESN'T* functionally knows how to be a predator - they just choose not to be.
What do working out, *WINNING*, sex and getting paid all have in common for a man?
They make you feel powerful.
And it's crucial to a man's mental health to feel powerful. Regularly.
I believe this is the cure to depression in men. Depression in men = sense of powerlessness.
This is why men tend to be solutions focused rather than catharsis focused (though the latter does happen too) - just give them a way to feel powerful again, and you'll "fix them" - that's it. Being understood is great too, but it comes AFTER that, not BEFORE it.
Mainstream doesn't understand this, because mainstream is feminised to the point men are basically alien to them.
This is why it tries to apply female ways of doing things to male needs, and fails epically
The greatest lie the devil ever convinced you was that beauty is weakness, and ugliness is strength.
This is a widely believed illusion - a state of mass hypnosis almost, but it is functionally, archetypally untrue.
Being negative takes *ZERO* skill - so how can it be strength?
Just because some are more talented in the negative than others, as in, more creative and forceful with it, doesn't make them strong - makes them dangerous, yes, but not strong - dangerousness is not strength if we define strength as the capacity of a soul to resist impurity.
They are dangerous because they are influential, and because they can self-perpetuate the memeplex of destruction, because they are a chaos variable, but they are not strong, because they failed to preserve the inherent beauty they were born with, they let this world spoil them.
If you know a couple and they both vote for different political parties, then the woman doesn't really love the man. Woman should either just not care about politics at all, or be mostly aligned with her man's preferences and reverent of him to the point she wouldn't defy him.
That's actually what it is. Lack of reverence.
"Making my dissenting opinion known and felt is more important than showing you respect"
And lack of respect means lack of love
Because love is egoless and self-sacrificing where ego is intolerant and selfish
Devil in the details
That's why a woman who wants to keep the peace really loves a man, but a woman who doesn't want to, doesn't
Following is an actual skill, and reverence makes it easy
Lack of reverence means lack of respect, and lack of respect leads to contempt which leads to betrayal