A woman has to decide whether she's going to partner up with a man and be the best housewife she can be so she will get provided for OR accept she will be working long hours and grinding corporate for the rest of her life. Failure to be good at either is what results in poverty.
Now of course some insecure woman with trust issues is going to come along and say "what if I'm a good wife and he leaves me anyway"
You're missing the point. Corporate can fire you and make life hard too. The point is you have to pick a path, specialise in it and be good at it.
If you don't have the intellect, energy levels and stress tolerance (low enough neuroticism) to be competent in leadership capacities, you're temperamentally not cut out for full-time, high order complexity work. This is most women. If that's you, fine, nothing to be ashamed of.
In that case you're better suited to being in the home and finding a man who's all the things you're not (predominantly: high energy and high stress tolerance) - because these are the traits that make a good provider, and you lack those traits, so won't provide well for yourself.
The problem is when you're temperamentally not suited to high corporate level achievement, BUT ALSO are not temperamentally well suited to being a good wife and serving your husband.
This is how you end up old, alone, and poor with no insurance plan.
I am not being dramatic.
A woman who lacks the traits to have a successful career but also lacks the traits to be a good wife has nothing of value to anyone. She will either fail to marry or end up divorced, and she will struggle to survive on whatever low wage she is capable of earning.
So, in a nutshell, if you're a high IQ, high energy, not too neurotic woman, and you don't really trust men or for whatever reason have grand ambitions, a career is an option for you and can pan out (no poverty) but for the vast majority of women, marriage is the superior option.
"Why can't I do both?"
You can, but you'll excel at neither as family gets in the way of work and work gets in the way of family.
And the best men won't opt for a woman who's always stressed from work and too tired to cook and clean when he can just have a fully dedicated wife.
If you enjoyed this thread, please consider subscribing to my email list at follow.tellyoursonthis.com to be kept up-to-date with all my latest content.
Thank you.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Gratitude and empathy are honestly two of the most attractive qualities a woman can have.
Imagine being with a woman who appreciates every single thing big and small that you do, takes nothing for granted, and really *KNOWS* how hard it is for you.
Practically unheard of!
Many of them act like you giving them the Earth is bare minimum, that they deserve it, and that if you can’t do it you’re not even a real man.
Zero empathy or gratitude for actually how hard it is to provide as a man, just entitlement.
Not very wife tier behaviour tbh.
I don’t think godless women are capable of real empathy though
Decades of observing have led me to this conclusion
And even some religious women are bad too
But whenever you do see true empathy for a man from a woman, you find a woman who has struggled that is a true believer
As there's morally bad things that feel good, and morally good things which feel bad
And it takes a sufficiently benevolent and cunning man to ensure you only feel good whilst doing good.
This is essentially the art of managing women.
But it's that inherent propensity to trust, obey and be compelled by emotion that makes women a liability - it's what makes them more manipulable and influenceable even at advanced age.
It's why a "woman who knows better" will still make mistakes.
Because he made it feel right.
Men don't trust their emotions as much as women, and although sometimes it gets the better of them, they don't see it as this perfect thing. They realise it can be misleading.
They don't believe "something feeling right" makes it true or wise or accurate.
If we define maturity as having empathy for you as a man, and we define empathy as having some insight into male psychology/your struggles and complementing that.
Then yes, most women never mature.
Only women who really have empathy for men are outliers with good dads.
From her perspective it’s accepting less than she thinks she’s worth because she’s not truly respectful of or attracted to the man she decided to marry
That’s why she calls it settling
In reality, she’s lucky to even have a man who thinks she’s worth the bother
She’s conceited
Imagine you have multiple potential investors and the least intelligent and poorest of them’s the only one who agrees to invest
And instead of being grateful you got the help you needed
You resent having to settle for your least preferred investor
The arrogance is breathtaking
Like you need them
But you won’t appreciate them and will in fact egregiously mistreat them because they aren’t “good enough” in your eyes
Even though you’re the fundamentally needy party and should be thanking God everyday they made it possible
Competing with a woman as a man is like competing with a child as an adult.
There is no upside for you.
If you win, you’re a bully, and if you lose, you’re a gay that got beat by a child/girl.
The asymmetry is inherently not in your favour.
This is why you need a pet woman as your champion to fight battles you can’t.
You actually see corporations do this all the time, even the police do it.
The police will use women to arrest women so they can’t fabricate a sexual abuse claim and so it doesn’t look as bad to the public
Elon has Linda Yaccarino to be the aligned HR mum for his company to offset all his “advertiser unfriendly” aka based masculine behaviour.
It’s amusing when you see it, but also an invaluable tool for you strategically.
All I will say is that the typical woman is not up to the task to “be your champion”.
It won’t be your wife, unless you married the wrong woman.
You’re looking for an unmarriageable, intelligent but knows how to be aggressive type of careerist woman who is tough and less delusional but has both positive masculine and negative feminine traits.
The whole “power couple” meme is very rarely done right and for the most part is just a man who married a masculine woman getting dictated to but thinking he’s in charge because he relies on her the way you would typically rely on a man.
It’s almost homosexual as zero polarity.
It’s only really possible with two outliers and even then it’s somewhat fraught.
Most celebrities are not good examples of this. I can think of maybe one good example.
But the average idiot girl boss thinks this is *THE MODEL* and what she deserves, when it will all but fail.