Iran has unveiled its 'FATTAH' hypersonic ballistic missile, with a range of 1400km and maximum speed of Mach 15.
Instead of a high-lift HGV, it uses a speed-optimised MaRV with a thrust vectoring sustainer motor.
THREAD
Before we get onto the MaRV, its pertinent to look at the first-stage booster. From the shape of the fins it looks based on the Kheybar-Shekan. It's launched at an angle (not vertically), implying a quasi-ballistic (mostly in-atmosphere) flight profile.
This depressed trajectory means the MaRV can be controlled with fins, as on Fateh, Zolfaqar series, Raad-500, Kheybar-Shekan. However, sustained atmospheric flight significantly decreases speed and range. Fattah solves this problem with a solid-fuel, flex-nozzle sustainer motor.
The sustainer motor is used to increase the duration of hypersonic flight, and its flex-nozzle conducts maneuvers in the upper atmosphere where the fins aren't very effective, but can still provide stabilisation. At lower altitudes the fins take over completely.
Speaking of the MaRV, it's a significant departure from Kheybar-Shekan (3rd image). The nosetip is much narrower and the shape itself is much closer to a pure cone than the triconic Kheybar-Shekan. Again, heavy emphasis on speed over lift-drag rato.
Ultimately this results in a high-performance depressed trajectory missile capable of maneuvering at sustained hypersonic speeds. The low-lift warhead is not designed to "go around" ABM radars, which would be futile in the ME which is saturated with them (especially Israel).
The MaRV can attack ABM by confronting them at reduced altitude and massive speed, minimising detection range and reaction time. The fins and TVC are sufficient to make high-G maneuvers at a kinematic advantage.
The next step for Iran is arrowhead-shaped HGVs like HTV-2 and DF-17. These designs have a high lift-drag ratio and could cruise at lower altitudes for longer periods. Useful in anti-ship role, where ABM radars are more scarce and avoiding detection is possible.
Israel's assassination of Nasrallah gives us an insight into how they might tackle Iran's nuclear facilities.
Israel used 40-80 BLU-109 "penetrator" JDAMs rather than dedicated bunker busters. F-15s were completely loaded with bombs (7 each) & no external fuel tanks.
BLU-109s can penetrate approximately 6 ft (1.8m) of concrete. It's unknown how deeply buried Hezbollah HQ was, but it's clear that the Israelis made successive hits at multiple points to penetrate it.
This is clearly a huge effort, but it wouldn't be feasible against Iran...
The obvious main difference is range. Carrying 7 tons of draggy ordinance next door to Lebanon against no air defences is easy. But Iran's enrichment sites are 1500km away and heavily protected, dispersed, and buried.
Reminder to all to be vigilant of the disinformation on both sides during this war, which can take many forms.
5 Examples
1. Journalists posting stories briefed to them by officials on one side, designed to present a particular narrative. An common technique in propaganda wars
2. Fake or old/unrelated videos posted by either side. Designed to exaggerate or minimise the scale of friendly or enemy action, or allege warcrimes. Usually simple clout-chasing, sometimes organised disinfo.
3. Propaganda by omission and censorship. Tight censorship is (obviously) important for OPSEC, but can also be used by both sides to control the narrative of who is winning and who is losing.
Many focused on Shoigu - Secretary of Russia's Security Council and former Defence Minister - and Major General Bagheri, Chief of General Staff of the Iranian Armed Forces.
But I thought the entourage was more interesting...
During the meeting with Bagheri, key Russian officials included Shoigu's deputy Venediktov, and also Dmitry Shugaev. Shugaev is Director of the Federal Service for Military-Technical Cooperation, responsible for military-technical cooperation between Russia and foreign countries.
The Iranian side included Brig. Gen. Mehrabi, who was also present when Shoigu visited Iran in 2023 as Defence Minister. The US sanctioned Brig. Gen. Ghoreishi in 2023 (while he was at another post), claiming he negotiated UAV exports to Russia.
Hezbollah has so far denied that its rockets hit the area in Madjal Shams. We'll see what info comes out but for now I'll say this explosion seems quite large to be from a failed interceptor or anything like that.
Next few hours will decide if there is a wider war or not
I've seen some say this was a Falaq rocket. Falaqs have relatively large (50+kg) warheads.
These are some images I've seen from the blast epicentre. There is only a very small crater.
I would say that the visually large blast is more consistent with fuel rather than explosives.
Blast warheads in rockets/bombs are high velocity and create large craters but aren't "fiery" like fuel explosions are (low velocity).
The crater is more like a 122mm rocket but the fiery blast doesn't match. It's possible a rocket or even debris hit some fuel.
It could be the booster section of a Blue Sparrow target ALBM which has a separable payload section. However there is no reported sighting or hearing of impact anywhere in Iraq or Iran of the payload section.
This would make sense as from what we know Blue Sparrow isn't a weapons system and it wouldn't really be able to hit anything. Could just be a very minor demonstration of "we did something"
I don't usually praise Iran's public messaging but everything since Op. True Promise has been spot on. In all levels of govt, military, and foreign ministry.
Crucially for deterrence purposes, Iran has repeatedly promised that Israeli attack in response would not be acceptable.
This is important because it aligns with the int'l consensus that the conflict shouldn't be escalated. So Iran's own deterrence goals are backed by int'l pressure on Israel not to escalate further.
There are numerous examples of the above but other aspects have been positive too
Intentions of strike made clear, will to de-escalate emphasised. This kind of message has been repeated multiple times over the past days to make clear that Iran is not interested in escalation, laying the blame for any future conflict on Israel.