The failure or destruction of the #NovaKakhovka dam will cause significant humanitarian issues and it will certainly affect the execution of Ukraine's offense & Russian defensive operations.
UKR has stated they anticipated this potential disaster. 1/5
Generating hydroelectric power & irrigation for most of the Kurdish and northern Iraqi provinces, it was considered the most poorly constructed dam in the world.
Like the NK Dam in Ukraine, it had about 11.1 km3 of water, and it's destruction would have been catastrophic. 3/
It was also contested...between Kurds & Arabs. Al Qaida posted several notices that they were attempting to destroy it to cause more division in the Iraqi society & a humanitarian disaster.
The @USACE provided modeling of what a failure would look like downstream, to Baghdad. 4/
It never was attacked & it didn't fail.
It's since received repairs, but it's still a tenuous structure.
@1stArmoredDiv had many contingencies to deal with the disasters.
I'd bet the Ukraine do, too, but it will be a tough mission and it will affect the fight. 5/5
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My first contact with @CNN was in 2003, in Baghdad.
I was the assistant division commander of @1stArmoredDiv. One of my duties was "working with the press" (assigned to me by the Division Commander)
During combat, a "stringer" -an Iraqi reporter working for CNN - was killed. 2/
A CNN reporters - @janearraf - asked if I could escort a visiting exec - @EasonJordan - from the Baghdad airport to their bureau. It would speed him and keep him safe along the "highway of death."
I said yes. I met Eason, threw him in my HMMWV, then took him downtown. 3/
Against my better judgement, I thought I would engage @TrentTelenko on his 🧵, to perhaps defend some of those - as he says - are throwing "horses**t against the wall."
Here's a shorter 🧵 suggesting some things that Trent (& others) may not be considering. 1/
First, I'd like to compliment the Telenko family - especially his father - for service during a critical time in our Army. I was a young LT/CPT during that transformational period & saw some of the things Trent mentions when I commanded platoons, companies, & served as an S3. 2/
Most of the run-up Trent gets right.
Cost cap & capabilities guidance for the original M1 is correct. In both cases, cost grew & requirements changed (like they always do).
Also, the M1 grew out of 10+ yrs of the MBT-70 program w/ W. Germany. 3/
The “hush” video posted by Ukraine is a reflection of this.
No bragging, no bluster, no indicators of what is happening…just a nuanced “we’re ready, and we’re about to go.”
You never underestimate your enemy, but you must be confident in your potential. 2/
Compare that to what’s happening on the Russian side, today:
-more messaging by Prigozhin about dysfunction in RU govt & military
-Russian mutineers killing commander before deserting
-anti-Putin militias continue attack in Shebekino & beyond 3/
In opening, I stated I’ve never been opposed to providing any type of equipment to Ukraine, but rather I’ve attempted to outline the availability, logistics, training, immediate use, national security aspect & cost (political & fiscal) challenges of each item. 2/
Each nation has their own way of war, and the methods, approaches, equipment, training & doctrine are trained & refined over decades by the armies of those nations.
When a nation goes to war, the training, systems, equipment, processes & doctrine kicks in. 3/
…happening at once.
-intelligence prep of the battlefield (with shaping operations, raids, deception, etc)
-a great plan with a solid synchronization matrix
-various means to suppress the enemy (artillery, direct fire, electronic jamming & other means)
-obscuring the breach 2/
-a well-rehearsed breach force with plows, mine clearing charges, “cutters,” etc
-marking of the breach lanes for a well-rehearsed follow-on force that will hold the shoulders of the breach
-a plan to the attack or bypass the defending force that is over watching the breach
…3/
Yesterday, I posited that the attack by the "Russian Volunteer Corps" or "Liberty of Russian Legion" into Belgorod/Bilhorod Oblast was likely a raid.
A raid is doctrinally defined as a type of limited attack for a specific purpose. 1/6
While not having additional intelligence on this incursion into Russia, I still believe it is a raid.
Raids are used to threaten or seize a limited objective, they cause movement by the enemy to defend against the raid & they are usually short in duration with a small force. 2/
Raiding forces sustain themselves (no need for a logistics supply line), and after achieving their objective(s) they usually quickly withdraw.
A raid surprises the enemy, throws the enemy off their plan, and causes confusion. 3/