Failing to indict Samsel until seven months after his arrest, combined with having been subjected to “diesel therapy” 16 times, along with his prison injuries, his case should be thrown out.
At any other time, and at any other protest, every true “liberal” journalist and jurist would be screaming for his release and his case to be dropped, because of those rights violations. An appellate court should immediately intervene.
That said, Samsel is not a good guy. First, and foremost, in relation to his encounter with Ray Epps, he has lied . . . one way or the other. I have a copy of Samsel’s FBI interview transcript, as well as the high-def audio and video of the interview . . .
Samsel’s exact words to the Agents about what Epps said, were, “He came up to me and he says, dude -- he says -- his exact words were, relax. He says the cops are doing their job. That's exactly what he says to me right there in that picture.”
The Agent responds: “So, why right after that do you continue to not relax and let them do their job?”
Samsel answers: “The cop -- that particular cop right there. He kept talking shit, talking shit, and talking shit. And the guy behind me was like, man, fuck that shit.
Blah, blah, blah. Fuck you. And I turn around. I said, oh my God, dude . . .
. . . And then he said, yeah, that's right. Turn around, bitch.”
Except, only two seconds after Epps whispered in Samsel’s ear, Samsel joined others in shoving the barricades over, resulting in the injury to Capitol Police Officer Caroline Edwards.
That follow-up “shit-talking” from another officer didn’t happen as he described.
Now, Samsel tells American Greatness, “[Epps] said to me, ‘Don’t pull. I’ve got people. We have to push through.’”
Was he lying to the FBI in that interview? Or is his new version of the Epps’ story the true one?
Video evidence makes it abundantly clear that Epps did in fact — on several occasions — encourage agitated protestors to “calm down,” but there is also video evidence that Epps did have others with him. (“I’ve got people.”)
Epps was led out of the throng of people by eight other men, despite his testimony that he was in DC with only his son and his son’s friend.
Samsel told American Greatness that the DOJ “tried to coerce him into saying Epps tried to calm the situation.” But the FBI interview video shows no such coercion. The Agent asks Samsel: “So, who's this guy?” Samsel calmly and immediately responds, under no coercion:
“He came up to me and he says, dude -- he says -- his exact words were, relax. He says the cops are doing their job. That's exactly what he says to me right there in that picture.”
No coercion.
I would include a copy of that FBI interview video and transcript, but I believe they are still under seal, and would therefore be illegal for me to post.
To either the FBI or American Greatness . . . Samsel lied.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In the immediate aftermath of former Senate Sergeant at Arms Michael Stenger’s death on June 27, 2022, conspiracy theories began flying on social media. Last night I had the opportunity to speak with one of Stenger’s close friends about the final months of his life.
In Stenger’s only Senate testimony following #Jan6, he famously said in his opening statement:
“Investigations should be considered as to funding and travel of what appears to be professional agitators.” (February 23, 2021)
Stenger was one of the only high-ranking J6 figures to insinuate there might have been such an organized assault on the Capitol, rather than a riot spontaneously instigated by Trump’s speech at The Ellipse. That’s all the conspiracy purveyors needed.
Think of which Congress member you were most disappointed in for having caved and voted ‘Yea’ on the debt ceiling compromise. (I’m looking at you, @RepThomasMassie.) 1/7
The fact is, they were pressured by @SpeakerMcCarthy and other leaders, with threats against their own committee and leadership positions. 2/7
Unfortunately, this is not speculation. This is well-sourced, insider info. Basically, to keep their leadership status, they failed at true “leadership.” 3/7
Mehta returned at 12:37 pm, to begin reviewing the sentencing guidelines and other considerations . . .
Mehta addresses Rhodes directly, “You were convicted of seditious conspiracy, and you’re a lawyer. . .” Then the lecture begins . . . which includes the history of seditious conspiracy under the law, and says it’s one of the most serious offenses any American can commit.
It is a series of acts in which he and others committed to using force against the government of the US, to prevent the transition of government to “the new guy” because he doesn’t like “the new guy.”
Stewart Rhodes rises to say that he is a “political prisoner.” And that this is an ongoing process to shut down political speech. He makes the point that many of those in other protests, like ANTIFA, ...
...who made open attempts to interrupt the transfer of power to the Trump administration were never prosecuted for their words or violent actions.
Rhodes describes why OKs provided escorts and security at many political rallies across the country …
...because left-wing protestors and Antifa were violently assaulting peaceful protestors.
He makes the point that at hundreds of events, the OKs never used violence or force to deter violence, and were never charged with any crimes at any other events.
AUSA Rakoczy rises to state the government is asking for 25 years for Rhodes. She reviews the major highlights of the case and specifically makes the case that Rhode’s conspiratorial mindset not only manipulated his followers into taking on violent and revolutionary actions.
But also proves that given the opportunity, he would lead another attack against the government if given a chance.
The court must therefore impose a sentence of 25 years.
Phil Linder rises to say that he doesn’t believe anything he or other counsel can say will change Mehta’s “already determined” sentencing. Nor can they present any witnesses that will change his predetermined sentencing.