“The word pandemic used to have a very specific meaning. It was used to describe a scenario where there was extensive incapacitation of key workers & large numbers of deaths, including young ppl.”
“A genuine pandemic is not something that would have needed billions of dollars in advertising for ppl to even notice & fear.”
“The notion of a ‘pandemic’ was relentlessly promulgated through mainstream media to ramp up fear in the population, to help push through mRNA Emergency Use Authorisations and other extremely harmful policies (e.g lockdowns).”
“This would not have been possible were it not for the false premises that covid was: 1) novel; 2) lethal; and 3) unprecedented.”
💯💯💯💯💯💯💯
“It was none of these things. 👆👆👆
It was no more novel than numerous other viruses which emerge each year in terms of the ability to be recognised by our immune systems.” 👏👏👏
“The mortality data for 2020 is unremarkable globally when compared to previous influenza seasons except perhaps in New York City 🗽& Northern Italy 🇮🇹.”
“In both of these outliers, the data emerging is raising uncomfortable questions about the relative contribution of the virus versus the impact of policy-related responses when considering the extraordinary number of deaths reported.” #Omerta
"Without the highly flawed & fraudulent PCR case data and draconian global restrictions on doctors’ freedom to treat their patients as they saw fit, there would be nothing particularly notable about [2020]."
"Outside of PCR driven data, a small rise in the number of calls to ambulances for breathing difficulties was observed, though it is possible that hysteria and fear may be responsible for at least part of this."
[Me: Or for most of it, cf NYC ⬇️]
"We might have noticed an unusually late spike in influenza-like illness but not much more. Mortality-wise, it would appear as a mid-range ‘bad flu’ year."
[Me: There would have been no such spike. Again, see NYC ⬇️.]
"Interestingly, the WHO quietly altered the accepted definition of ‘pandemic’ in 2009, just before the so-called H1N1 ‘pandemic’." ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
[Me: 'Pandemic,' indeed. More like *Man-Demic* (h/t @EthicalSkeptic or Panic-Demic. NYC again⬇️]
"The rushed-to-market Pandemrix vaccine which was pushed hard in the face of the imaginary ‘pandemic’ was subsequently pulled from the mrkt due to life-changing side fx (often in children), a signal picked first up in Finland but later found elsewhere." ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
During the H1N1 'pandemic', we saw the highest number of deaths from respiratory disease in the month the vax debuted.
Imagine that.
(Source: CDC WONDER)
"In essence, [WHO] used exactly the same fraudulent playbook in 2020, but seemed to have ironed out some of the ‘problems’ encountered the first time round."
[Me: the *problem* in 2009 was that they couldn't seem to make enough people die to exceed excess thresholds.]
"Vicious behavioural psychology tactics were the main tools used to ‘correct’ these ‘problems’. Shaming people into believing they may ‘kill granny’ was a master-stroke." theguardian.com/world/2020/aug…
"They used guilt, shame and the threat of ostracism, these being some of the most powerful drivers of human behaviour."
"There was even an identical cast of characters; Fauci, Drosten and Gates, all reporting for duty, aided and abetted by the bought and paid for media machine working on 24 hour overdrive."
"In 2003, an influenza pandemic was defined as follows:
'An influenza pandemic occurs when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity, resulting in several simultaneous epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness.'" twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
[Me: Wait, 2003? The year the WHO report about SARS was published? The report that has some now-familiar concepts and language? Huh. ]
"In 2009, the WHO decided, in their infinite wisdom, to get rid of the words 'enormous numbers of deaths & illness.' from the definition. You would think deaths & serious illness were the only meaningful characteristics of a ‘deadly pandemic’."
"To successfully fight against the globalist mission creep of tyrannical public health measures, we must collectively stop stoking the ‘deadly pandemic’ fire."
"If we continue to allow this falsehood to embed in public consciousness, all of the unethical horrors enacted will simply be repeated for the next non-pandemic-pandemic."
"Without the requirement for excess deaths and widespread serious illness, malevolent profit-driven interests can simply will a ‘pandemic’ into existence on finding any new mutation amongst the global virus population."
"A $trategy to force countries to invest heavily in $earching for genetic anomalies will fuel the pandemic creation industry. Once 1 is found, the response can be fuelled by using fraudulent test data & media ads, as they did very succe$$fully in 2020." web.archive.org/web/2020053006…
"We cannot allow this to happen again and must therefore reclaim the word ‘pandemic’ to ensure it is only applied in the correct way." 🔥🔥🔥🔥
CLARIFICATION:
This is a graph of pediatric deaths, not all age groups. Graph is correct - I inadvertently left out the word "pediatric" from the tweet
"While two influenza B virus lineages have co-circulated, B/Yamagata-lineage circulation has not been confirmed since March 2020."
Since when?
Oh. March 2020.
"The WHO FluNet database indicates that B/Yamagata-lineage detections were reported in 2021 and 2022. However, detections can result from use of quadrivalent live-attenuated vaccines."
From what?
Oh. The QV vax.
"Of the type B viruses detected post-March 2020, all ascribed to a lineage have been B/Victoria-lineage."
The user name is the header, the user's written speech/publication follows, the date/time posted & views are the footer, and other user's reactions are tracked at the bottom.
IMO, anything words above the footer should not be subject to additions or labels.
Same tweet, now adulterated by The Community - which has "decided" the tweet is in need of "Context"
Twitter uses CN to adjudicate tweets in a Populist/Mob Rule fashion
It's not much different than employees selecting & labeling tweets as "misleading," w/links to CDC, etc.
I've written a Very Long Letter to Will Jones of The Daily Sceptic, regarding his estimate of covid deaths from overzealous ventilator use in the spring of 2020.
The letter is posted at the end of this 🧵.
These are the Figures & Tables, in the order they are referenced.
Despite finding its first covid case in January, "novel deadly virus" was having no impact on the number of deaths occurring at Chicago hospitals, until Human Interventions.
When will officials tell the truth about what occurred?
By the way, a "Covid patient" is someone who is in the hospital that tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, regardless of the reason the person was admitted or symptoms/indications they had.
"It would've been so much worse."
The graph shows hospital deaths (all causes) weren't going anywhere.
You would expect a "spreading" virus to be impacting mortality in some gradual way prior to shutdown orders.