You stated at today’s hearing with Julie Su that the @USDOL’s proposed new independent contractor rule is “so reasonable that hardly anyone had much criticism about it.”
Minute 3:11:55 ⬇️
2/25 There were two public hearings about this proposed rule. Both were overwhelmingly dominated by independent contractors begging the government to stop attacking our chosen careers.
I’d add a link, but @USDOL wanted no evidence of this public outrage, so made no recordings.
3/25 So many independent contractors begged the U.S. Small Business Administration Office of Advocacy for help in stopping @USDOL’s rule change that the SBA office came out against the proposal.
“The bias … makes the risk that independent contractors would be misclassified as employees especially acute, with potentially dramatic consequences for entire industries.”
“SBE Council strongly opposes DOL’s proposed changes to the current independent contractor … rule, as it will upend flexibility, financial security and success for millions of self-employed Americans.”
“Limitations on N/MA’s members’ use of such content by narrowing independent contractor opportunities will … damage independent workers’ livelihoods and the products and services provided by N/MA’s members to consumers.”
“It is improperly skewed toward a finding of employment status, even when a worker is a bona fide independent contractor engaged in a business-to-business relationship based on economic reality.”
“Proceeding with the proposed rule will lead to confusion and uncertainty for all stakeholders, and lead to unnecessary negative impacts on our already fragile economy.”
“DOL’s Proposed Rule, far from giving workers security, takes away their security in knowing that they can continue to work in a job they like, be their own boss, and maintain the flexibility their family needs.”
14/25 Thomas Jefferson Institute for Public Policy:
"The proposal … could cripple a significant portion of the 632,995 Virginia businesses with no employees, many of which serve as independent contractors to other businesses.”
"The chilling effect of the proposed rule will thus undermine not only
individuals’ economic freedom but also the spirit of entrepreneurship in America generally."
"For most of IEC’s electrical contractors, this is just not practical or feasible and for some, could significantly impact their ability to continue operating altogether."
The rule change “would result in an onslaught of 1099 workers to become forcefully classified as W2s, resulting in potential layoffs, increased prices, or even business closures for women-owned businesses."
18/25 Strategic Services on Unemployment and Workers’ Compensation
"The proposed rulemaking indicates that it is not intended to disrupt the businesses of independent contractors who are…in business for themselves, but that is exactly what it would do."
"We write to call to your attention the chaos the rule will create for our members and the independent owner-operators they contract with in our state."
"In fact, the proposal will only benefit trial lawyers litigating this issue in court by blurring the lines so badly that virtually every case has to go to trial."
“IFA has strongly opposed efforts to enact independent contractor tests that rob franchise owners of their investments by effectively demoting them to employees of their brand.”
22/25 American Association of Nurse Anesthesiology:
"We are concerned that the six-factor test could be applied too stringently and may wrongly preclude CRNAs from choosing to work as independent contractors"
"This proposal as is would seriously disrupt the current and historical choices of the real estate industry that have been in place for at least fifty years."
25/25 We all agree, @RepTeresaLF, that misclassification is wrong.
What we need is for lawmakers like you and nominees like #JulieSu to stop smiling for the camera and lying through your teeth while you try to misclassify us.
1/15 The people who want to wipe out independent contractors are changing their messaging.
Pay attention to what’s happening right now in the press. Our opponents are trying to shift the narrative—with impeccable timing, ahead of upcoming congressional hearings on our issue.
2/15 Two days ago, this story ran in the Los Angeles Times. In its first paragraph, the writer suggests (falsely) that virtually all independent contractors are being victimized by algorithms that are being used to determine things like pay rates.
3/15 The story is based on “research” by Veena Dubal—a name well known to us. She’s one of the “researchers” whose work underpinned the mess in California that led to the #FreelanceBusting ABC Test law known as #AB5.
"If you’ve ever worked for an on-demand app platform, or for Amazon, or even as an independent contractor at all in the last few years, there’s a good chance that you’ve been discriminated against — by an algorithm."
My cell rang about an hour ago. It was a recorded message from my congressman, @RepMalinowski, asking if I wanted to be on a live forum right now and ask him a question.
You bet I did.
I told the screener that my question was about @RepMalinowski co-sponsoring ...
2/4 ... the #PROAct, even though for more than a year, I've explained to him the problem with the ABC Test in it, and how just as happened to independent contractors in California when it was tried there, this ABC Test will outlaw careers like mine.
The call screener said ...
3/4 ... he was an IC too, and hadn't heard about the #PROAct, but was going to make sure to look into it now.
I was then put on hold for the full hour. The congressman never took my question.
Although, I did hear him yell "No!" twice when he appeared to believe he was muted...
1/10 So. There was quite the little dustup yesterday in the comments on this tweet from @LeaderHoyer about @TheDemocrats' intention to start trying to pass the #PROAct on March 8.
2/10 Proponents of the effort to outlaw most IC work have one main talking point. It is the same exact talking point we have heard in calls with the staffers who work for the bill's sponsors. These people are all reading from the same script in trying to defend the #PROAct.
3/10 This talking point is some version of, "The ABC Test in the #PROAct is only for the purpose of union organizing. It doesn't affect wages, hours or terms of employment."
Here's why they're using that language, and why their argument is disingenuous.
1/4 There is a disconnect in the @nytimes with reporting on PPP loans and reporting on the #PROAct.
This story on PPP states, "The adjustments are intended to increase aid to the very smallest businesses, many of which are run by women, Black people ...
2/4 ... and members of other minority groups." It also quotes @POTUS: “Getting our economy back means bringing our small businesses back." The changes “will bring much-needed, long overdue help to small businesses who really need help" ...
3/4 Whether @nytimes and other reporters realize it or not, many of these same small-business owners are the ones whose work would be outlawed under the ABC Test in the #PROAct, which @POTUS champions.
How, if we are small businesses worth saving now under PPP, are we also ...
1/14 @TheDemocrats I am begging you to read this thread.
In 2019, when those of us who choose to earn a living as independent contractors realized your plan was to roll out ABC Test labor legislation nationwide, we thought you'd made an oversight. You started in California...
2/14 ... and then tried in New Jersey and New York with the same bills, which impose the 1930s ABC Test for labor law on our economy here in the year 2020.
Your message was that the law had to change because gig companies like Uber were out of control, misclassifying workers...
3/14 ... as independent contractors when they should have been employees with benefits. People like me--who make up the 70-80% of people who consistently say we prefer IC work--figured we were accidentally caught in the crosshairs of this policy, and that you'd exempt us ...