manasataramgini Profile picture
Jun 8 7 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
A longish thread related to teaching evolution in Indian education: I heard via this medium &other that they had moved the teaching of evolution from the 10th class to a later class. In my days 10th class was the last year of compulsory school after which you could go to junior
college or continue in school. We too did not have evolution in 10th class in our state. However, we had a little chapter on DNA which most students did not fully grasp as their chemistry was not up to mark. In our days the curriculum and most teachers were substandard; hence, it
really did not matter much. In the ideal world, we would begin the biology course, in whatever class it starts (in our days 5th class), with the evolutionary theory. It is probably the most solid theory in all of science and can be understood by relatively simple-minded folks.
Everything in biology would be taught around it. Now, I saw left-liberal mlechCha academics suddenly getting interested in India and piling on H in this regard. I'd tell them to GTFO and stick to their business -- they have forsaken common sense itself for the soraShaNDAditattva,
so don't lecture the H. That said, it must be said education in evolutionary theory and biology might help wean the H of contrafactual fantasies they gravitate towards, such as OIT. It was recently brought to our attention that a major H organization was presenting material for H
self-definition. There an ``atheist'' was presented as one believing in evolution while H, as per their definition, were portrayed as believing in scientific theories like ``quantum mechanics''! So there is a lot of house cleaning even in our pakSha. I was reminded of a mlechCha
woman saying how a pretasAdhaka was advising her family when she was young to throw out a statue of Darwin because it was causing ghosts to possess her/their house.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with manasataramgini

manasataramgini Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @blog_supplement

Jun 9
Another longish thread on education in light of the mlechCha-liberal fake news that the periodic table had been removed from the Indian curriculum. Here again, I take a similar view to evolution that it should be introduced early. I acknowledge that chemistry is a difficult
subject to introduce. After starting with the atomic theory do you make the students go down the route of gas laws, moles and the foundations of thermodynamics; or do you make them study the basic types of compounds, or do you introduce them to the diversity of elements and their
properties? I personally feel gas/thermodynamics/specific heat can wait. When chemistry is first introduced I think it should start with atomic theory; then the common elements and their types should be studied without the periodic table; then common types of compounds. These can
Read 7 tweets
May 20
How part of this is (at least for me) a hard question to answer since it goes back to the provenance & phonology of khan and the word behind "chanyu". Mongolic, para-Mongolic, Yeniseian, Turkic& Iranic etymologies have been proposed -- basic all over the place.The key is the word
behind Chanyu. I'd go with the suggestion that it was an old chIna word for the title Tarkhan that continued to be used by para-Mongolic, Turkic & chingizid Mongols. What the "Khan" in Tar-khan related to "Khan" that's a rather contentious point. If yes then a variant Khan was
already used by the first Hun (Xiongnu) empire. Further, another title from this empire recording in old Ch has been interpreted as a rendering of Khan. Hence, Khan could have been used beside Tarkhan& simply superseded it. It seems the supersession was related to what we believe
Read 4 tweets
May 20
In 1075 CE the chIna scholar Shen Kuo was sent as an ambassador to the Khitan emperor Chala (temple title: Daozong). It is quite remarkable that he calls him by the same title used more than 1000 years prior to that for the Hun Khaghan: Chanyu. It is also notable that the record Image
of this visit shows that even in 1075CE well after the founding of the Khitan empire by the Khan Abaoji ~907 CE, they were still leading a life close to their ancestral state. The notice of a mobile "ancestral temple" is also intriguing.
Chingiz Khan, in his letter to the Daoist scholar Chuji, mentioned how he saw a continuity of the Mongols with the Hun Khaghanate of the Chanyu. Some had thought it might mean the Khitan empire referred to above as Chanyu by the Song. However, Chingiz is clear in mentioning the
Read 7 tweets
May 11
Where the Alkhan huNa-s paramabhAgavata-s. Below is our tabulation, the only systematic one to our knowledge, of the key symbols left behind by various huNa lords, while vaiShNava symbols dominate in overall number, they are not exclusive. Hence, we may infer that they were Image
typical paurANika H may be with vaiShNava leanings. In support of this after the Alkhan lord toramANa overthrew the gupta viceroy at airikiNa (modern Eran in MP) during his invasion of mAlava, he allowed his successor, now as his feudatory, to complete the viShNu temple.
toramANa's son mihirakula is clearly mentioned as a pAshupata and keeping with this his coins AFAIK only feature a trishUla. However, we have a possible sealing from him which depicts him worshipping viShNu & he has lakShmI on his coins. So he might have had shaiva leanings but
Read 5 tweets
May 10
hUNa, Xiongnu, Chionite, Kidarite, Hephtalite, Alkhan, hyona: The Hun-s: Could the root of this steppe power have been Indo-Aryan?
In the yaSht to the goddess druvAspA we have the following incantation wherein kauvi vistAspa, the patron of the promulgator of the Iranian counter-
religion zarathustra, invokes her against several daeva-worshiping foes whom he wishes to smite or ``bring'' to the counter-religion (good religion): Image
Then again we have: Image
Read 11 tweets
May 7
Cranial capacity is normally distributed. Got 821 skulls from data of the early American phrenologist Morton. As noted before different measurement methods give somewhat different results but overall tend to be consistent. The data here is mean, when multiple measurements exist Image
The red lines on the right tail indicate the big-brained archaics & early sapiens, in order: Boskop: early African sapiens; Xujiayao-6: East Asian archaic; Amud-1: West Asian Neanderthal; Xuchang-1: East Asian archaics. The possibility that the east Asian archaics are actually
Denisovans has been proposed, though we don't know for sure. It shows that the biggest modern sizes were already attained by 100,000K years in some groups. In Morton's data the overall mean for sapiens is 1328 cc which is less than the average for Neanderthalis ~1500 cc. It has
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(