Fritz Leiber wrote a sci-fi story called The Silver Eggheads a future where an "author" was a hyped-up celebrity who operated a machine that generated "word whooze", text calculated for maximum emotional effect, addicting readers who retained no memory of what it said.
There were only so many of the machines because each one had been patterned after the brain of an actual author Once Upon A Time, and no one knew how to make new ones plus there were no experienced authors around to copy. (This was the 1960s, so it was a very analog future.)
The authors rebelled and smashed the machines so they could unchain their own creativity, all except for the viewpoint character who quite enjoyed a cozy life of collecting royalties and accolades for doing George Jetson's job and couldn't understand why anyone wouldn't.
To be clear, Leiber (widely suspected of being an author him) wasn't presenting this guy's viewpoint as correct, he more just needed a bewildered witness to the proceedings for expository purposes.
Also, there was a lot of weird fetish stuff in there, because it was the 1960s and it was hard to get science fiction published except by soft core pornographers who needed something to stand in for "the articles" in "I just read it for the articles".
The story wrapped up at the end with a very esoterically happy ending where writing became art again instead of automation, and I don't know if I could say decades later what I think the point of it all was. The fetishy stuff made a deeper impression on me, reading it as a kid.
But the concept of "word whooze"... hypnotic strings of phrases that have the shape of coherence without being coherent, that your mind insists must have meaning, but which means nothing... is one I keep finding applicable to modern life.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We seriously upped our indoor air filtration because of the fire, and I am pleasantly surprised to learn that a lot of what I thought was "my body and brain just don't cope well with heat" was apparently a mixture of heat and air quality.
Like, yesterday I glanced at the digital thermometer in my office and was surprised to see it was 78F in here. Usually as soon as it ticks a degree or two over 70, I start having issues, and by 75 I feel like I'm drowning in cement.
But I felt fine, and I had so much energy yesterday that I ran into the issue of "Oops, not used to having this many spoons and now I've overdone it." Which happens in part because high energy days are rare.
Yes, this. I spent five years telling people that his cons being so obvious was a feature and not a bug. He wanted the low-hanging fruit, the marks who would stay marked without effort on his part. He's busy, he doesn't have time to convince people.
We know he looks ridiculous. His marks take in the most basic markers of Tall, Tan, Full Head Of Hair plus white and male and accept that he is an impressive figure. He puts no effort into making any of that look good because if you're going to scrutinize, you're not *reliable*.
That's what the thing with Comey was about. Comey, like the rest of the FBI to this day, was a conservative and philosophically Republican even if he disclaims party membership for reasons of official neutrality.
And by that point HE HAD ALREADY SWUNG THE ELECTION FOR TRUMP.
Of course he was lying when he said he'd declassified it all, and of course he knew he couldn't declassify "in his mind", but it astounds me how many people accepted that.
"Classified" as in a classification system. The status literally cannot exist in just one person's mind.
It would be useless to have any kind of secrecy priority ranking system that is secret even from the people required to abide by it, but. The reason "classified" means "secret" is it's short for "classified as..."
Classification system. Not a magical cloak of secret privilege.
I know the real answer here is that it's pure internet troll logic whereby Trump must be right and his opponents must be wrong so you score the points however you can, and you can leap from "the president can declassify things without limitation" to mean ANY limitation.
I don't know who needs to hear this (it's Ben Shapiro) but taking something that isn't yours because you think it's cool and you want it is a nefarious purpose.
And the danger isn't that he was selling them. It's that he was SHOWING OFF national secrets at a club full of spies.
Ben Shapiro: "You think Donald Trump stole national secrets to sell them for a direct profit. I, an intellectual, know he stole them to show them to people to gain stature with them. We are not the same."
I mean, here's the thing. Here's the thing. Trump ventures don't make him money. He went bankrupt running casinos. CASINOS. What his businesses do is manufacture the illusion that he is successful and important, so banks/investors will give him capital. That's his income.
The "leaks" is the funniest part of this to me because I remember Elon saying that the cybertruck would be able to function "briefly" as a boat, and it was touted as a safety feature in the event of road flooding.
The sort of people who buy Elon's products definitely include some who will drive those things straight into a river.
LOL, reading between the lines of this and the paragraph above it, it seems like the problems are potentially unsolvable because they cannot be solved without changing the design of the truck, which was nailed down first, based on aesthetic appeal to one man, who is married to it
I don't know what these guys (there's at least one more in the replies making a similar lament) think an "algorithm" is or what it's doing, but they clearly don't understand that followers are actual people who want to follow you, not a score that just goes up for posting.
So much of the natural marketplace for Elon's blue checks is people who are convinced the only reason that some accounts they don't like had higher follower counts than them was special treatment, and they believed once Elon bestowed it upon them, the universe would right itself.
Elon's fanatics can overlook the most enormous failings, but a lot of them are starting to feel the dissonance between what they thought "Twitter 2.0" would mean for them and what it means (Twitter 1.0, but even more broken.)