Here's the thing, though, & it should be 🚩🚨. Rez & presumably other churches w/in UMD *do* require members agree to obey clergy in their extraordinarily unconventional "New Member Covenant."
It opens with a commitment to obey and support those in spiritual authority, particularly the bishop and clergy.
Nowhere in this document does it discuss informed methods of issuing a complaint about clergy, only a members responsibility to comply.
Concerns with leaders are to be kept private, not even to be discussed with friends or other leaders in the church.
Instead, the concerned layperson is to attempt to privately confront the leader, something that disregards power dynamics & safeguarding best practices.
Note this entire subsection about honoring leaders including:
-obedience & submission to their authority
-idea that obedience prevents conflicts (!!!)
-preemptive dismissal of *common & dangerous* allegations against leaders.
This is highly irregular & controlling.
Again, people who have concerns or issues are directed to privately go to someone in leadership, presumably so they can persuade them to stay.
I don't know what kind of church discipline was going on at the parish level, but the way it is addressed here is foreboding.
The signature page includes agreeing to the extensive rules on conflict (the focus itself a 🚩) and again a reminder to honor leaders.
I don't know if all UMD churches sign this membership covenant but to my knowledge they are required to include the Unity Pledge.
If you are wondering why people in UMD/Rez are not speaking about these matters directly, well, this is why.
Members have been taught this from when they joined the church, and the church culture supports it.
This is wrong & weirdly controlling.
It's also unbiblical, despite the fact that the entire document is prooftexted with Scriptures to bolster these points.
There are many NT examples of Christians confronting problematic teaching & much of it involves public discussion.
If you are in @MidwestAnglican or another @The_ACNA diocese that attempts to muffle your concerns or funnels all information through the clergy, please know this is a mark of unhealth.
This can look like: seeing children as "vipers in diapers," beliefs that a diagnosing all misbehavior via a sin lens is "shepherding a child's heart," & telling parents to spank "on faith" b/c God wants them to.
It's so 💔b/c it often leads to shipwrecked faith. 2/
One of the most revealing ways it shows up is in the *parent's* role. They are told they act as "agents of God" & the primary way they inhabit this function is by sussing out sin & punishing it in a disobey-spank-reconcile formula. 3/
Maybe I will say a bit more b/c it is not right or wise the way chaotic episcopal supervision (or its lack) combined e/ a push for church in “Anglican 1000” & “Always Forward”🧵
Seeing chatter about @The_ACNA stances on women's ordination. ACNA constitution allows for dioceses (groups of parishes under leadership of a bishop) to decide this.
In short: a small number (7 dioceses/18k members) do not allow women as deacons or priests, and a vast majority (21 dioceses/85k members) ordain women to diaconate.
Of those, 11 dioceses/74k members (so slight majority in province) ordain women to priesthood. 2/
Baptists who are trying to understand the Anglican position might consider the centrality of the Table & Eucharist in Anglican worship.
In that sense, the conversation re: women's ordination often has to do w/beliefs about apostolic succession & validity of the Eucharist. 3/
Let's also talk about the theology hidden here: "no fussing" is huge in some corners of Christianity& reveals a view of a detached & disinterested God.
Sleep-training, blanket training, insta-obedience all reinforce this idea of expected cheerful compliance.🧵
Doug Wilson recommends letting infants cry alone to learn "man is born to trouble."
Gary Ezzo cites "My God, My God why have you forsaken me" as justification for cry-it-out sleep training: "Praise God that the Father did not intervene when His son cried out on the cross." 2/
Ezzo goes on to defend his statement, which reveals the theological underpinnings: "The Father's nonintervention in the suffering of His Son is the ultimate example that speaks against the fraudulent notion that love always requires immediate intervention.” 3/
"Witnesses from the US & Canada have voluntarily provided testimony & others were scheduled to do so had this trial continued. Hundreds of hours have been spent by both parties, witnesses & the Court to see that justice prevails..." Provincial Prosecutor Runyan.
💔tallying.
🧵
The witnesses & ppl on the court, join survivors, advocates & countless other volunteers who wait for functional processes.
Their work has once again been displaced by Bp Ruch being "focused on information about the investigative process" (from Runyan's letter). 2/
After Runyan announced his intention to resign, Bp Ruch's defense filed "a Motion for a Directed Verdict of Not Guilty"—evidence of a clever defense but, if it should come to be, would further erode trust in ACNA's administrative capacity & in episcopal trustworthiness. 3/