Here's the thing, though, & it should be 🚩🚨. Rez & presumably other churches w/in UMD *do* require members agree to obey clergy in their extraordinarily unconventional "New Member Covenant."
It opens with a commitment to obey and support those in spiritual authority, particularly the bishop and clergy.
Nowhere in this document does it discuss informed methods of issuing a complaint about clergy, only a members responsibility to comply.
Concerns with leaders are to be kept private, not even to be discussed with friends or other leaders in the church.
Instead, the concerned layperson is to attempt to privately confront the leader, something that disregards power dynamics & safeguarding best practices.
Note this entire subsection about honoring leaders including:
-obedience & submission to their authority
-idea that obedience prevents conflicts (!!!)
-preemptive dismissal of *common & dangerous* allegations against leaders.
This is highly irregular & controlling.
Again, people who have concerns or issues are directed to privately go to someone in leadership, presumably so they can persuade them to stay.
I don't know what kind of church discipline was going on at the parish level, but the way it is addressed here is foreboding.
The signature page includes agreeing to the extensive rules on conflict (the focus itself a 🚩) and again a reminder to honor leaders.
I don't know if all UMD churches sign this membership covenant but to my knowledge they are required to include the Unity Pledge.
If you are wondering why people in UMD/Rez are not speaking about these matters directly, well, this is why.
Members have been taught this from when they joined the church, and the church culture supports it.
This is wrong & weirdly controlling.
It's also unbiblical, despite the fact that the entire document is prooftexted with Scriptures to bolster these points.
There are many NT examples of Christians confronting problematic teaching & much of it involves public discussion.
If you are in @MidwestAnglican or another @The_ACNA diocese that attempts to muffle your concerns or funnels all information through the clergy, please know this is a mark of unhealth.
Lazarus, the friend of Jesus, is stone-cold, four-days dead. And Jesus, with a word, . . . brings him back to embodied life.
We probably have heard sermons parsing out the details: 🧵
Jesus was a short journey away, He intentionally waits—despite his love for Lazarus & his sisters—He comes to Bethany too late. Lazarus’ disease has so overtaken him that he is sealed up in death, shut off from his family, from his community, and from his life. 2/
As I consider the imagery of the tomb, I don’t have to wonder very long to recognize the graves in my own soul. I know them well, these dead places I’ve long sealed off to keep the odor of decay at bay.
“Take away the stone,” Jesus says to the bystanders. 3/
From the beginning, it’s never been good for men to be alone. But somehow many of us still insist on male-only ordinands, pastors, or leaders. 🧵
From Eden, the pattern appears to be men and women together as priests and prophets doing priestly work as living icons who reflect God’s image. Many churches, however, have inverted this, impoverishing the church by functionally withholding and muffling the witness of women. 2/
If we misread passages like Titus 2 to be re: women hosting women’s Bible studies, if we see women named as house church leaders in Acts & imagine they were busy fixing up the guest rooms, we miss the female priests and elders and leaders all across the pages of the NT. 3/
When I saw the priest swipe the Ash Wednesday cross on my baby’s forehead, I cried.
“Remember that you are dust and to dust you will return,” the priest said, and I looked at my round-cheeked, bobble-headed, newly-born gift, and I was terrified. 🧵
He will die one day, I thought, and the simple truth of the human condition quickened inside me.
I spent one January in the hospital with that child when he was gravely ill, and, for a time, the doctors didn’t know how to diagnose him. 2/
If you’ve ever lingered in a children’s hospital, you know it is a hallowed place.
It rends your heart to see young bodies worn thin w/illness & bloated w/medication, to watch toddlers toting IV poles, & to find children—who should be running & jumping & laughing—bedridden. 3/
As always, it's a good idea for ACNA ppl to read through @ArlieColes' meticulous documentation.
You may think this is a non-issue, but Title IV impacts how allegations against *bishops* will be adjudicated, so here's how I see it mattering, but I'd love to hear from others too🧵
I always encourage ppl to review their *diocesan* canons b/c that is where you are going to find info re: training your clergy receives & how concerns in your parish will be handled.
This advice still holds. Find out if your diocese cares about a trauma-informed framework.+
Same with your parish. Most ppl (speaking broadly) are going to be most impacted by things at the parish & diocesan level.
That being said, what happens at the provincial level does trickle down, esp if you have concerns about a bishop, as we have ample recent evidence. +
Fr. Matt & Rev. Anne have again taken on the role of self-appointed ideological judge & jury, demanding a public apology & calling for the entire discussion to be shut down.
This is the opposite of cultivating healthy communities, let alone allowing for critical thinking. 3/