✅ From the atmospheric environment - PM 2.5.
✅Dust particles with silicon.
✅ Carbon black particles like what you breathe in every day on your drive home.
All 4 of them "...were found to reinforce virus uptake, replication, and release, and to drive viral transport to extrapulmonary organs including the liver, spleen, and kidney."
But PM 2.5,from the atmosphere was the worst.
Interestingly, the TYPE of air pollution drove where the viruses accumulated the most.
The turbinate of the nasal cavity from exposure to virus-laden carbon black.
Lung alveoli for the PM 2.5, dust, and Biochar from the forest fires.
Crazy, right?
@dbdugger will be interested in the SIGNIFICANT reduction of lymphocyte count with AFP borne viruses.
So, these AFPs made us sicker - and in places deeper in our body
How NOT to Science. A time travel thread and magic.
This is Helmut Traindl - the engineer who devised the procedure behind Walach CO2 study that was retracted after 16 days: jamanetwork.com/journals/jamap…
I looked at your thread @moog77 . The reason that epidemiological didn't work (cases continued to go up)? Is the same reason the 2023 Cochrane fails, ironically, after you touted it as the "gold standard."
Not because clean air doesn't reduce cases. It empirically does. It
Got a "oops, outside air can get you" study. Coming out of Beijing University of Technology - taking airborne transmission seriously.
They rented 50 rooms of a building. Did some very cool CFD work - then, be still my heart,
followed it up with tracer gas experimentation.
See room 303 above? 403 and 503 got whatever came out of 303.
With studies like these, there are so many variables. But, if I lived in an apartment, I would set have at least a PC fan CR Box next to those open windows.
Or an HRV set up in that window. And for sure a PC fan CR box next to the front door for under the door airflow.