✅ From the atmospheric environment - PM 2.5.
✅Dust particles with silicon.
✅ Carbon black particles like what you breathe in every day on your drive home.
All 4 of them "...were found to reinforce virus uptake, replication, and release, and to drive viral transport to extrapulmonary organs including the liver, spleen, and kidney."
But PM 2.5,from the atmosphere was the worst.
Interestingly, the TYPE of air pollution drove where the viruses accumulated the most.
The turbinate of the nasal cavity from exposure to virus-laden carbon black.
Lung alveoli for the PM 2.5, dust, and Biochar from the forest fires.
Crazy, right?
@dbdugger will be interested in the SIGNIFICANT reduction of lymphocyte count with AFP borne viruses.
So, these AFPs made us sicker - and in places deeper in our body
Please explain how a study measuring physical improvement in a Cognitive and Behavioral study can have unmeasured Graded Exercise Therapy - and be considered as well-controlled. Not confounded.
So, I emailed Dr. Ebell and asked how that was nitpicking.
I also agreed with the comments at the bottom of the study, linked below.
If you change analysis protocols post hoc? That's not nitpicking in my book. But maybe that is nitpicking?
DYK that you, and me, and everybody are Pig Pen from Charlie Brown?
We shed our entire outer layer of skin every 2-4 weeks, about 500 million cells daily.
Your corneocytes (outermost cells) lift off of your body with the
gentlest of micro-air currents. Like a leaf picked up off the ground for the briefest of moments in fall.
They act like 12 micron aerosols in float time, but 25% of total skin flakes are sub 5 microns...and you know what that means. Deep deposition - or shallow as
sub 5 likes to also deposit in the nose.
It's funny...I embrace push-back in debate. Tightens up my game.
Imagine if those skin flakes now have Ebola on them?
Two studies show that Ebola literally oozes through the skin - both ways. In and out.
"...due to the desirability of an off-
the-face design, and not for protection from aerosols, respirators may be used instead of medical masks"who.int/publications/i…
If you can stay 3 feet away while screening? No medical mask needed.