#research#mathematics I haven't thought about this for more than 10 minutes yet, but clearly the discrete topology doesn't work, if someone comes up with a pretty explanation of what's in this valley between (connected?) Lie groups and locally profinite groups please DM me 🥰
I also think this NSS property is a clear obstacle for realizing Lie groups as (meaningful) inverse limits of topological groups, but maybe the other way around works?
What I mean is that maybe you can realize any (connected) Lie group as the closure of a direct limit of ...
...finite groups
(most basic example is S^1 is the closure of the roots of unity, which are an obvious direct limit of finite cyclic groups)
It would be great if such a general theorem existed, because it would also shed some light on this evil twin nature of Lie & prof groups
HERE ARE MORE EXPLICIT QUESTIONS:
1. Can you obtain any (connected?) Lie group as the closure of the direct limit of all its proper closed subgroups?
2. Can you always realize a (connected) Lie group G as the closure of HK for H and K proper closed subgroups of G?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If you could generalize Hahn-Banach's theorem to a slightly greater class of "subspaces", but now only for a Hilbert space, it seems to me that by taking duals (exact functor) one could approach better the invariant subspace problem for complex 2nd countable Hilbert spaces
idk though, I just wanted to transform f \in B(H) for H=l_2(N), assuming f is an injection with not dense image, to a surjection by taking duals but need Hahn-Banach for that functor to be exact...
If it were, direct decomposition after dualizing and taking another dual seems 👍
*Note:
In algebra, when working with field extensions, people don't really give a shit whether the field is canonically embedded in the extension or not. They just want a ring morphism between them (automatically injective).
But that matters in non algebraic solid worlds a LOT
I have just seen a podcast where you appeared addressing @EricRWeinstein's GU theory and the paper you wrote about that.
That was quite enlightening, and I would also expect for Eric to properly address your well put together paper
As a long time follower of Eric and someone that appreciates some of his ideas and points of view as very original and well spoken out: he is very smart and has a lot of knowledge and experience, I don't doubt that
I couldn't help feeling identified in several parts of the video
For example, this video:
was made before covid-19, and I think that's a hit for Eric, for identifying crucial issues and X-risks
We seem to not have the responsibility to weigh the level of our current advanced technological power nowadays