\Perfectoid Peter\_. Profile picture
Jun 10 7 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
*Question (research)

within loc compact T2 groups,

+ what makes Lie groups different to prof. groups is that they have a small neighbourhood from which every closed subgroup escapes

+ and (locally) prof. groups don't have such a neighbourhood for open subgroups

(1/x)
It's sad we have to require small subgroups but not for closed subgroups but for something even much stronger

open subgroups

but that also means that there is a structure in between? what is it like?
What are the locally compact Haussdorf groups G such that for every neighbourhood U of 1_G there is a closed nontrivial subgroup H \subseteq U...

...but still there is a neighbourhood U_0 of 1_G such that every open subgroup H of G escapes U_0?

#LieGroups #TopologicalGroups
#research #mathematics I haven't thought about this for more than 10 minutes yet, but clearly the discrete topology doesn't work, if someone comes up with a pretty explanation of what's in this valley between (connected?) Lie groups and locally profinite groups please DM me 🥰
I also think this NSS property is a clear obstacle for realizing Lie groups as (meaningful) inverse limits of topological groups, but maybe the other way around works?

What I mean is that maybe you can realize any (connected) Lie group as the closure of a direct limit of ...
...finite groups

(most basic example is S^1 is the closure of the roots of unity, which are an obvious direct limit of finite cyclic groups)

It would be great if such a general theorem existed, because it would also shed some light on this evil twin nature of Lie & prof groups
HERE ARE MORE EXPLICIT QUESTIONS:

1. Can you obtain any (connected?) Lie group as the closure of the direct limit of all its proper closed subgroups?

2. Can you always realize a (connected) Lie group G as the closure of HK for H and K proper closed subgroups of G?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with \Perfectoid Peter\_.

\Perfectoid Peter\_. Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PerfectoidPeter

Jun 12
_-----~~~** The Daily Dualities (1/3) **~~~-----_

- F_0 := Hom_{cts}( . , S^1) = continuous group homomorphisms with S^1 as a Lie group.

*1* (Exercise)

Abelian Profinite
<-~-~- F_0 -~-~->
Abelian Torsion

*2* (Pontryagin)

Abelian Compact
<-~-~- F_0 -~-~->
Abelian

(...)
_-----~~~** The Daily Dualities (2/3) **~~~-----_

- LCA := Locally Compact & Abelian

*3* (Pontryagin) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontryagi…

LCA <-~-~- F_0 -~-~-> LCA

-Abelian (Top. Groups) --- F_0 ^(1) -~-~-> Abelian (Top. Groups)

*3.1* (...)

(1) Is F_0 a Galois connection here?
_-----~~~** The Daily Dualities (3/3) **~~~-----_

Stereotype Groups < ---
F_0 (but changing compact-open topology by topology of uniform convergence on totally bounded sets)
--- > Stereotype Groups

- F_1= F_0|_(Abelian Top. Groups)

(...)
Read 23 tweets
Jun 11
If you could generalize Hahn-Banach's theorem to a slightly greater class of "subspaces", but now only for a Hilbert space, it seems to me that by taking duals (exact functor) one could approach better the invariant subspace problem for complex 2nd countable Hilbert spaces
idk though, I just wanted to transform f \in B(H) for H=l_2(N), assuming f is an injection with not dense image, to a surjection by taking duals but need Hahn-Banach for that functor to be exact...

If it were, direct decomposition after dualizing and taking another dual seems 👍
*Note:

In algebra, when working with field extensions, people don't really give a shit whether the field is canonically embedded in the extension or not. They just want a ring morphism between them (automatically injective).

But that matters in non algebraic solid worlds a LOT
Read 4 tweets
Jun 10
@IAmTimNguyen Hi Tim!

I have just seen a podcast where you appeared addressing @EricRWeinstein's GU theory and the paper you wrote about that.



That was quite enlightening, and I would also expect for Eric to properly address your well put together paper
As a long time follower of Eric and someone that appreciates some of his ideas and points of view as very original and well spoken out: he is very smart and has a lot of knowledge and experience, I don't doubt that

I couldn't help feeling identified in several parts of the video
For example, this video:



was made before covid-19, and I think that's a hit for Eric, for identifying crucial issues and X-risks

We seem to not have the responsibility to weigh the level of our current advanced technological power nowadays
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(