just got off the phone and computer with 2 trusted former intel people. some of the take aways we got that we can openly talk about (that is known) is that as predicted ukr is not pushing for a single deep thrust as much as a thrust along the entire line.
we are tracking 3-4 thrusts with more probably coming. this will force ru to use up or shift forces to block all the thrusts. with ukraine probably to launch more than 25 major thrusts in the next few days. this will force ru to block every one or they may have a breakthrough. twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
every time ru blocks a thrust they have to bring res forces out of hiding, or from the deep reat and bring them in rang of ukr 155mm guns or himars. once the res forces are used and no more mobile blocking forces are left then the real fun should start.
also the russians will have to use every bit of its artillery. this means that ru and ukr artillery will be going after each other in the open.. and ru guns that are shot out, with less accuracy, less range, and less mobility will probably pay a heavy price.
ukr STILL has the ability for at least 2 brigade sized water crossings, and a brigade sized air assault with about 100 helos with supporting deep artillery to tie down more units.
it looks overall like ru troops (from reports and vid) are starting to break and run. without artillery or armor support facing ukr troops that want payback i cant see russian troops standing their ground. once panic starts its going to be the Crimea 500 IMO.
and yes there will… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
again nothing opsec related. have faith, it looks like there is a plan. and from reports its working..
the russians can only keep showing the bradley pile so long... sooner or later they will run out of ... everything.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
wow and thats why i dont like tweeting on the phone...
the reason why you cant assemble a huge corps like 9 brigade attack in ukraine is .... nukes.
tactical nukes.
the russians dont look at battlefield nukes as real nukes. they have been telling everyone that they are going to… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
WOULD they use them, i dont know. but nukes have changed the face of war (or the threat of one).
thats why D-Day landings will never happen again, thats why multi division attacks in one area will not happen. even the threat of a WMD taking out a MACOM (major command) has… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
lets say that ukraine gets all 9 brigades together of 1st corps.. in one area. do you think that the russians are not going to at least think of using a nuc on 30% of ukraines counter attack, prior to it happening?
just saw a vid from the ru side...
5 brads
1 mine plow leo2a6
1 mine plow t55 2-3 m113 gone 2-3 older soviet tanks
this was a company sized attack from what im seeing.
artillery was not suppressed enough in my opinion
a company with attached units would be 2 infantry platoons, 2 tank platoons an engineer platoon and other attachments. this is about right for a unit
from what it looks the leo2 hit a mine the brads tried to cover it and came up both hitting mines. the 2nd plow vehicle also hit a mine and was disabled. the brad with the TOW up looks to have been fighting back till the commander turned and tried to leave. all the ramps down… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
yea well ...
here is why no one should take gen. hertling seriously about sending things...
On may 30th the Kyiv independent published a story about the “challenges” of the UAF to train and deploy the M1 tank. In the article they stated many “facts” that I was shocked at seeing… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
In the past you would hear the argument that the UAF could not operate, supply, maintain, (enter system here) and the item would have little or no affect. This argument was out there for the HIMARS, M777, HARMs, and recently the patriot. Now the F16, and M1. All the arguments… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
now again some are saying that there will be challenges to the M1, in my opinion (backed up by data) the remarks are short-sighted/doctrinaire/based on outdated understanding not taking into account a wartime vs peace time fielding and a great track record Ukraine has built up.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
some people need to just stop...
north korea is NOT selling large amounts of ammo to russia. from current reporting NK sent about 6 rail cars of small arms (rifle ammo) to russia last year. and what im seeing it was WAGNER that made the deal buying commercial ammo
the news about the NKs selling ammo to africa then it gets shipped to another then another country then to russia was put out there for a reason.
to let countries know they are being watched and if they DO transfer or sell ammo to russia they will pay in sanctions
from reports NO ammo has been seen in russia with north korean markings, or mystery ammo... its all marked with lots and dates that are easy to track.
just like china selling 100 or 1000 M16s (china copies) the only stuff that is being sold is on the commercial market, and few
its getting nuts. russian telegram is saying that the ukr forces blew up the dam... hard for me to believe this. but at this point anything is possible/ huge grain of salt.
more and more reporting saying that something is going on there
as i have been stating for months if ukr wants to cross the river they have to take the dam or make it go away, but if ru wants to stop a bridging attempt they have to blow the dam...