Read on Twitter
of course it is.
control of money is vital to the conception of the modern nation state.
if commerce, savings, and investment become opaque to government it would represent the greatest transfer of power away from the center and to "we the people" since the conception of rights
control of money is vital to the conception of the modern nation state.
if commerce, savings, and investment become opaque to government it would represent the greatest transfer of power away from the center and to "we the people" since the conception of rights
https://twitter.com/MarioNawfal/status/1667559581193469954
it would undermine everything they use to sustain control.
they could not regulate commerce, lending, banking, or investment.
they would not be able to see what you are paid or what you pay others.
and you cannot tax what you cannot see.
they could not regulate commerce, lending, banking, or investment.
they would not be able to see what you are paid or what you pay others.
and you cannot tax what you cannot see.
the idea that people would need to be induced to voluntarily contribute to gov't enterprises on an opt-in basis terrifies them because they know that most of what they are "selling" cannot survive consumer sovereignty and such emergence would lead to true individual sovereignty
the path to "government by the consent of the governed" runs through taking control of the money and removing the monopoly on its issuance, accumulation, and transfer from the state
and leviathan knows it
this is an existential threat to them and their regimes of legal plunder
and leviathan knows it
this is an existential threat to them and their regimes of legal plunder
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
