“The evidence in this indictment is very damning for the former President."
- @JayTownAlabama, former U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Alabama (2017-2020)
Interview with @KenDilanianNBC @NBCNightlyNews
3. Plus conservative legal commentator:
“It’s a devastating document. If they can prove half of it, he’s toast.… They can probably prove more than half of it, because a lot of it is recorded conversations, testimony from his lawyers, and that sort of thing.”
- @AndrewCMcCarthy
4. “It is an extremely damning indictment.”
- Fox News legal commentator and GOP impeachment hearing witness @JonathanTurley
5. On Trump Indictment:
"I seriously doubt you're going to hear a serious person say, oh, well, this is fine and ... this is actually why this is okay. If you hear somebody doing that, that's crazy talk."
- @ScottJenningsKY
Also read his powerful words on military families.👇
6. Also note this analysis of the subtleties in @RonDeSantis' initial statement following the indictment.
(reporting by @NickNehamas @jonathanweisman) (others making similar point)
8. "It is impossible to read the indictment against Trump ... and not be appalled at the way he handled classified documents as an ex-president, and responded to the attempt by federal authorities to reclaim them."
9. Ty Cobb, former Trump White House lawyer @OutFrontCNN:
“I think [former President Trump] is in an enormous amount of trouble. I think that this indictment is about as carefully structured and evidentiarily supported as any indictment in history.”
11.
“The most damning piece of evidence to me is the audio tape. I mean you want to talk about consciousness of guilt. You want to talk about knowledge and intent. Those are the darlings of a prosecutor’s nursery. And that came from President Trump’s own mouth.”
- @TGowdySC
15. “It gives me no joy to write about prosecuting… Trump. He and I have been friends for nearly 40 years.… He is his own worst enemy, and the feds — of whom I am often highly critical — had no choice but to indict him.”
17. "The only duty to national security that he retained upon leaving office was ... not to disclose the information. He’s now being held accountable for his alleged failure to do so, as our system demands."
Devastating first-hand witness to Alex Pretti's killing
Declaration filed in federal court:
"I don't know why they shot him. He was only helping. I was five feet from him and they just shot him."
2/ "The agents pulled the man on the ground. I didn't see him touch any of them-he wasn't even turned toward them. It didn't look like he was trying to resist, just trying to help the woman up. I didn't see him with a gun."
"I have read the statement from DHS about what happened and it is wrong. The man did not approach the agents with a gun. He approached them with a camera. He was just trying to help a woman get up and they took him to the ground."
Here's what the Justice Department actually told the Supreme Court, and how DOJ defends ICE's use of racially profiling.
Full analysis on my YouTube and Substack
🧵
2/ Shareable link to full analysis⤵️
A close look at what the DOJ left undisputed.
And how DOJ admitted to the courts that stopping racial profiling would “upend immigration enforcement efforts” in the way ICE currently carries it out.
3/ Document
U.S. Solicitor General to the Supreme Court arguing to allow racially profiling as a factor supporting ICE's "reasonable suspicion."
A time for choosing, from main street to wall street.
"This new threat is not about my testimony last June or about the renovation of the Federal Reserve buildings. It is not about Congress’s oversight role. .... Those are pretexts."
2/ "I have served at the Federal Reserve under four administrations, Republicans and Democrats alike. ... Public service sometimes requires standing firm in the face of threats."
3/ "I will continue to do the job the Senate confirmed me to do, with integrity and a commitment to serving the American people."
An initially-secret report for Customs and Border Patrol in 2013 found:
In many cases, the “driver was attempting to flee from the agents who intentionally put themselves into the exit path of the vehicle, thereby … creating justification for the use of deadly force.”
🧵
2/ I discuss this report at greater length on my YouTube channel and Substack
3/ "Applying even the OLC’s expansive view from its recent opinions to Operation Absolute Resolve, the Executive action clearly crosses the threshold for requiring congressional authorization."