(1/14) Many of you are probably familiar with the fact that the Soviets used autoloaders on their late-Cold War tanks.
Today I only really want to talk about something special about the T-64's (and T-80B's) autoloader that is mostly ignored. But first, some background...
(2/14) Some of you may also know that the T-64/80 and T-72 families use different basic autoloader designs.
The T-64's (left) is known in Russian as the механизм заряжания ('loading mechanism', MZ), while the T-72's (right) is the автомат заряжания ('automatic loader', AZ).
(3/14) I won't get into the reasons/justifications why these tanks ended up using different autoloaders, (long story short: rivalry between the Kharkov and Ural design teams/factories), but let's take a closer look at some of the MZ control panels.
(4/14) In particular, note these switches on the T-64A (left) and T-64B (right) gunner control panels for the MZ. They are labelled 'СЕРИЯ' ('SERIES').
(5/14) When turned on, these buttons activate the 'series' working mode for the MZ autoloader.
(6/14) Ordinarily, for both the MZ and AZ autoloaders, you must press a button to tell the autoloader to load the next round, as shown in this Switchology video for the T-72M1.
(7/14) However, tanks with the MZ autoloader, like the T-64 and T-80, can activate 'series' mode, where the autoloader will automatically load the next round of the selected type (APFSDS/HE-Frag/HEAT) without the gunner's intervention.
(8/14) This means that if you stow your rounds together in type groups, you can obtain the fastest possible reloading time of the MZ autoloader (6 s), since the autoloader only has to rotate to the round immediately next to the one just fired, until that type runs out.
(9/14) Note that on the T-64B and T-80B, this mode cannot be used with the 9M112 Kobra gun-launched ATGM, but this is irrelevant today since Ukraine no longer uses the Kobra.
(10/14) This 'series' mode is not present on any of the T-72s (T-72B shown left) or the T-80U (right) or T-80UD.
(11/14) The 'series' mode, along with the superior 1A33 Ob fire control system compared to contemporary T-72s' TPD-K1 or 1A40 semi-automated FCS, allows T-64s to outshoot and out-reload contemporary T-72s (modern T-72B3s have a superior FCS).
(12/14) The 1st Tank Brigade in Chernihiv faced the 41st Combined Arms Army and elements of the 90th Tank Division, which at the beginning of the war was exclusively equipped with T-72s ranging from ancient T-72As to T-72B3s.
(13/14) The T-72's AZ cyclogram gives it a reload of ~7.7 s. If the next round to be fired is next to the previous round, then this will reduce the time to about ~7–7.1 s. It may be longer depending on crew reaction, since a button push is needed.
(14/14) So, even though it's often claimed their rates of fire are similar, under certain configurations/mode of operations, the T-64 can have an edge. This is confirmed by crew testimony such as from Dominikanets, who has experience with both the T-72 and T-64.
(BONUS) Dominikanets has created an interesting document listing his opinions of both tanks.
(1/10) Vasiliy Chobitok recently wrote an article explaining some misconceptions about the T-80UD (478B/BE/D/DU etc.) designations. Basically, the key differentiating point between the 478B and 478D series is the presence of the Shtora/Varta electro-optical jammers.
(2/10) Won't translate whole article, just outline key variants. 'Classic' 1987/89 T-80UD (blueprint 478Bsb-1): 'early' (blueprint/right #187 in the famous coup photo), 'late' (left/centre in photo) has heat shield on the engine compartment roof.
(3/10) Pakistan export T-80UD (478BE, blueprint 478BEsb): improved fire control with T01-K01E (TPN-4E Buran-E) sight (Luna IR lamp removed), modifications to 6TD-1 cooling and filters to suit Pakistani climate, using engine roof designed for 6TD-2 to accommodate them.
BTL-1 was designed in 1970 by the Malyshev factory's train design dept (Malyshev did more than just build T-64s) for service in the Far East against the Chinese. The concept is based on some German WW2 Panzerzüge with tanks fighting from flatcars.
In this video, they are using early production T-54s with rear overhang turrets (the so-called '1947/1949 models'), but essentially any tank (or Shilkas etc.) could be put on it as desired.
As originally designed, Malva used the gun and breech assembly of the Msta-S, complete with the semi-automatic loading system for charges and projectiles. Some used Msta-B barrels without the fume extractor.
Msta-B has a different breech design and ramming system, thus can be excluded at least based on the breech.