Read on Twitter
Affirmative gender care is interesting because of the scope of the debacle.
It was not just a couple kooks or a bad institution. Instead it was driven by elite consensus, Harvard on down.
There is also near total lack of clinical evidence to inform care.
…
It was not just a couple kooks or a bad institution. Instead it was driven by elite consensus, Harvard on down.
There is also near total lack of clinical evidence to inform care.
…
…
The transgression is of such magnitude (‘too big to fail’) that it will be impossible to hold institutions fully accountable.
No one is going to shut down Harvard Medical School, for example. And all the prohibitions that should have prevented this are already in place.
…
The transgression is of such magnitude (‘too big to fail’) that it will be impossible to hold institutions fully accountable.
No one is going to shut down Harvard Medical School, for example. And all the prohibitions that should have prevented this are already in place.
…
…
It almost feels like the long term solution must be political - that there needs to be a political project to put these institutions under surveillance to protect the public.
Without threats and penalties it doesn’t seem like they are capable of competent self governance.
It almost feels like the long term solution must be political - that there needs to be a political project to put these institutions under surveillance to protect the public.
Without threats and penalties it doesn’t seem like they are capable of competent self governance.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
