THREAD: Has President Trump Baited, Trolled and Trapped his enemies again?
Listening to the recent "leaked audio" of President Trump, it sounds like Trump and the unknown party are both reading a script.
They also appear to be joking, laughing, and trolling.
Listen:
Trump seems to deliberately rustle paper at key moments. And the audio sounds clipped, as if some words are deleted/spliced.
Trump says a document is "like highly confidential" but 'like' was omitted in the indictment, and "highly confidential" is not an official classification.
Did Trump himself leak the audio as a trap?
If President Trump had arrested senior Deep State players during his first term, he would have been vilified by the fake news media and Democrats.
They would have accused him of unprecedented persecution of his political opponents.
Instead, Trump baited and trolled his enemies into establishing many precedents that can later be used against them:
1. Former Presidents can be impeached 2. Former Presidents can be forced to reveal tax and business records 3. Former Presidents lose executive privilege
4. Former Presidents can be forced to release phone records and text messages 5. Former Presidents can have their homes raided by FBI 6. Former Presidents can be subpoenaed 7. Former Presidents can be indicted and arrested
None of those happened to any president before Trump.
President Trump himself was the bait for each of those traps.
His enemies are so desperate to "Get Trump!" that they have spent seven years throwing everything at him.
Seven years of constant witch hunts and hoaxes.
When one scam failed, they just manufactured a new one.
President Trump baited them every step of the way.
Trump's tax returns, when finally released, were squeaky clean.
But he acted like there was something to hide, tricking the Democrats into fighting him all the way to SCOTUS, where the precedent has now been established.
And "impeached" just means accused. Democrats accused Trump of stuff, as they've been doing for years.
But there was no evidence, so Trump was exonerated twice in his first term.
Pelosi presided over two failed impeachments. Her TDS backfired, but the precedent has been set.
Before Deep State players can be impeached, forced to reveal tax/business records, stripped of executive privilege, forced to release phone records and text messages, be raided by the FBI, subpoenaed, indicted, and arrested...
IT ALL HAD TO HAPPEN TO TRUMP FIRST!
NCSWIC.
2016 Hillary Will Get Trump!
2017 Tax Returns
2017 Comey
2018 Mueller
2019 Stormy
2019 Avenatti
2020 Impeachment 1
2021 Tish James
2021 Impeachment 2
2021 Garland
2022 Jan 6 Trial
2022 Taxes Again
2023 Stormy Again
2023 Alvin Bragg
2023 EJ Carroll
2023 Jack Smith Will Get Trump!
President Trump placed the Biden regime in the spotlight for this phase of The Great Awakening.
As Biden redpills the masses on the true authoritarian nature of the Democrat party, Trump is placing loyal patriots in key positions, and growing stronger and more popular each day.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A Level Playing Field: Trump and the XRP Prophecies
This thread ties together several seemingly unconnected events that together suggest XRP (a cryptocurrency launched by Ripple) has been chosen to play a major role in the future of global finance.
The thread covers the following topics:
1. Kim Clement X…P Prophecy 2. Kim Clement Trump Prophecies 3. Brandon Biggs XRP Prophecies 4. Elon Musk, PayPal Mafia and Ripple 5. President Trump and Ripple 6. A Level Playing Field 7. XRP Regulatory Clarity 8. XRP vs Bitcoin 9. Backed by Gold
10 Judy Shelton
1. The Kim Clement X…P Prophecy
Between 2007 and 2014, Kim Clement famously prophesied many events that aligned closely with President Trump's future election and subsequent shifts in US politics (the next post links to a thread with more detail on those prophecies).
Kim Clement’s X…P prophecy is less well known, but here’s what Kim said:
“Something starting with an X, and it has a P in it … that’s going to be worth investing in … I saw an X and I think there may have been a number and something else, and then P”
2. The Kim Clement Trump Prophecies
The thread linked below covers Kim Clement’s Trump prophecies in more detail.
Many of the 'awakened' know President Trump allowed the enemy to get away with stealing the 2020 election in order to place Democrats in the spotlight, thus exposing their radical policies and waking up more of the sleeping population. As the saying goes, sometimes you can't tell people the truth — you must show them.
But that's not the only reason why Trump stepped away peacefully on Jan 20, 2021. In fact, it had to happen this way to establish certain precedents.
In the aftermath of Donald Trump's presidency, a series of legal battles, often referred to as "lawfare," have unfolded, setting 17 new precedents that challenge traditional legal protections for former Presidents and regular citizens.
These legal actions, driven by Democrats, aimed to persecute, penalize and imprison Trump and his associates, impacting how presidential power and privileges are viewed and managed post-tenure.
This thread explains each of the 17 precedents, plus the potential for an terrifying 18th precedent that may still be on the cards.
1. Impeachment Post-Tenure
Post-tenure impeachment was a significant legal maneuver used by the Democrat-controlled House against President Trump, followed by a Senate trial held in February 2021.
This precedent implies that former presidents can face impeachment trials even after leaving office, potentially for actions taken during their term.
This move was criticized for its political motivations but set a precedent for holding former presidents accountable through congressional processes.
Ultimately both attempted impeachments of President Trump failed due to a lack of evidence, but they established precedents that can be used against other former presidents.
2. Tax and Business Records Disclosure
The legal battle to reveal Trump's tax and business records during and after his presidency opened up the possibility for any president to be subjected to such demands.
This was unprecedented, as it bypassed traditional privacy norms associated with personal financial details of high-profile figures.
President Trump hinted that his tax returns might be hiding something nefarious, thus tricking the Democrats into fighting the case all the way to the Supreme Court, ensuring the precedent was established at the highest level.
In the end, when Trump was 'forced' by SCOTUS to release his tax records, everything was squeaky clean, and in fact they showed many charitable donations that Trump hadn't previously discussed.
The mainstream media dropped the 'Trump Tax Fraud' narrative after that. But too late — the precedent was set.
As President Trump prepares for his next term, RINOs and Democrats claim he won't get his appointments approved.
The Senate role in confirming presidential appointments is a cornerstone of US governance. But, as always, Trump is 20 steps ahead and playing 5D chess.
His approach involves multiple strategies to navigate the potentially contentious confirmation path.
This thread explains three options: Senate vote, recess appointments, and 1998 Federal Vacancies Reform Act.
1. Senate Confirmation (VP as Tiebreaker)
The traditional path for Trump to secure his nominations is through the Senate confirmation process.
A nominee needs a simple majority to be confirmed, and Republicans have a 53:47 majority in the Senate.
Even if three RINOs block Trump's pick, giving a 50-50 tie, Vice President JD Vance, as President of the Senate, will cast the deciding vote.
This gives Trump the most direct route to approval.
But will this be sufficient for controversial appointments like firebrand AG Matt Gaetz, or ex-Democrat and military veteran, DNI Tulsi Gabbard?
2. Recess Appointments
The Constitution grants the President the power to make temporary appointments while the Senate is in recess. This was designed to ensure government functionality without prolonged vacancies.
Trump has expressed interest in using recess appointments if necessary to bypass Senate roadblocks for key positions. This tactic becomes viable if the Senate agrees to a recess, or if Trump can force one, by adjourning Congress if there's a disagreement on recess duration between the House and the Senate.
Recess appointments were frequently used by previous Presidents, and they fall into three categories: executive branch, legislative branch, and judicial branch.
For example, Barack Obama made 31 executive branch recess appointments, and one legislative branch recess appointment, and none for the judicial branch.
These are the total recess appointment numbers for each of the past six presidents (not counting Joe since he's not a legitimate president).
- Ronald Reagan: 240 recess appointments
- George H. W. Bush: 77 recess appointments
- Bill Clinton: 139 recess appointments
- George W. Bush: 171 recess appointments
- Barack Obama: 32 recess appointments
- Donald Trump: 0 recess appointments