That is a Pauling MedPod 720i, it received FDA approval in 2070 and was deployed widely in Weyland-Yutani's deep space vessels and offworld colonies since the 2160s. #BuildingBetterWorlds
"Non-op" may be something I revisit if it's now this easy and routine
I won't lie, that thing is so cool, and even Catholic hospitals couldn't deny it. I'm sure I have moral issues with all that badass shit they were doing in Top Gun Maverick too
Imagine being upset when you found out this exists?? The trans community stands with Sex Change Robots everywhere ⚧️🤖🌎
This is like something from "2312", which is set in 2312. Trans people are the future and that is an observable fact
We are, essentially, the crimes of the future
I really hope Cronenberg is an ally of this machine and all who offer themselves to receive its blessed ministrations. It's a Catholic hospital! Of course someone is praying before these surgeries. The world is more wonderful and incredible than I had ever dared to imagine.
The real story should be that more hospitals are using robotic surgeries because it's often an even better way to format-shift, which is fair use
These are doctors, surgeons, all relevant specialists involved in operating a surgical robot that works remarkably well. They are not only fine with this, they clearly consider it preferable in some cases. Notably, they are not the Daily Wire. They don't do flippant agitation.
Catholic hospitals rolling out top-tier sex change robots is just one way our current nightmare will be rewritten into a dream come true.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Solid lineup. Looks like AMC theatres in Florida and across the country are screening an anti-trans hate film on June 21 with Michael Biggs (SEGM), Lisa Marchiano (GETA), Julia Mason (SEGM), Stella O'Malley (Genspect), Stephanie 'needles' Winn LMFT (GETA) imdb.com/title/tt267614…
SEGM's Michael Biggs publishes anti-trans articles in a journal started by so-called ethicists to host their arguments for euthanizing newborns and the cognitively disabled, as other platforms had refused to publish such content
"TRANTIFA" thread: On the apparent invention of a previously unknown violent group by the UN Special Rapporteur on Violence against Women & Girls at @\UNSRVAW
To be clear, Alsalem has responded to this and states that the term "trantifa" was not one she coined or would use, and that this word was initially mentioned by a Daily Mail reporter.
Whether or not someone in media decided last week that a new anti-communist scare (see image) needed a catchy brand, that was just one recent incident among many completely unexpected things we've seen from UNSRVAW. What's in that thread shows how the office got to this point.
Your BMJ article cited Florida AHCA's finding of "not sufficient" evidence for transition. But that 'finding' was a sham process by the Department of Health, ending in "Care Effectively Banned" before the reports were written. How is that "evidence-based"? genderanalysis.net/2023/04/what-w…
Florida AHCA was relying on a small book of sources and references that are almost entirely copied from the internal document of a recognized Florida hate group. In fact, they paid one of the hate group's leaders over $3,000 for that mostly reused document genderanalysis.net/2023/05/andres…
There's no possible way that the evidence-based medicine movement would want something like this cited in support of their rigorous approach
Right now, Reem Alsalem from the UN is on the Daily Mail and Fox News inventing some vague shadowy threat from trans people, which she calls "TRANTIFA".
Alsalem is manufacturing fear because we just found out she's aligned with anti-trans extremists: allornone.world/2023/05/26/rig…
Where's the "TRANTIFA"? What you're seeing are anti-trans feminist shock troops, setting the front of the Mexico's Congress on fire because of a proposal to allow gender marker changes on legal documents. Their purple-white-green flag was raised: allornone.world/2023/05/26/rig…
This is what it looks like when they're running scared and desperately need to deflect
So where do they even begin with retracting this completely inaccurate and false statement about a healthcare provider, who acted accordingly with exactly how he demanded they act?
What exactly did they do wrong here? Nothing.
What exactly did he do right here? Nothing.
It's time to retract the claim that Plume approved transition treatment for a patient who didn't meet diagnostic criteria.