It largely goes hand in hand with this observation from @fullautoslur
The person I was interacting with seems to be largely right wing, but even she has fallen into this trap. Observing that America is a conquered nation is not any strange sexual fantasy, it's to note the current state of affairs and warn people to act accordingly.
The removal of Philip Schuyler was never put to a vote of the city of Albany, it was just done by the wine mom acting as the city's caretaker.
I have a different perspective on this having lived in colonized territory of NYC Metro my entire life and the point is made over and over in, for instance, Game of Thrones. The peasants don't care about who's sitting in the big chair. They care about their day to day lives.
The schoolboys in Les Miserables thought the commoners would rise to their aid for a new tomorrow. They didn't. And the schoolboys all died.
They might care when the king's guard comes to seize their animals and kill their families, but by then it's too late.
The people in America can go about their day to day lives without ever really noticing who's in the big chair. It's small, incremental changes that you don't notice until it's too late.
"You can just not be gay," is a fine observation. It ignores that it is everywhere now. It is the primary export of the United States. Nobody voted for it. It just is.
When my kids go to the search function on Disney+, the first suggested item is "Pride Month." It has a rainbow on it. It is bright in colorful to attract the attention of children. When they go to Target, they were asked to see "Satan Respects Pronouns" items.
"You shouldn't have Disney+"
Thanks for you input.
All American movies must include lesbianism or a gay character, irrespective of the fact that most non-urban move through their entire lives meeting only a few gay people, until recently when it became "cool" to be gay.
When I was a kid, it was "cool" to be black, which led to a bunch of suburban white kids wearing Raiders gear and red do rags. They looked ridiculous. This is actually not any different. Kids do what they're programmed to do.
Americans don't care who's in the big chair until they have to. I posted this as half a joke last night but it isn't really a joke.
If they have the infrastructure to take the land of white people and give it to the Indigenous, they will absolutely do that. It sounds absurd, but it isn't.
20 years ago they seized the land of a woman and gave it to a different private entity because "public use" was defined as "public good."
If you believe it would take any more than five members of the High Druid Council to say "actually it's in the public good to restore the land of the Indigenous whom the land was taken from originally" I don't know what to tell you.
Americans can act as though they aren't living under a hostile regime. They can act like that right up to the point where the Sheriffs come to take their stuff.
"America" is a conquered nation. "Americans" are not conquered. The people who control our government can non-ironically say that "Americans" are the biggest threat to "America" because it's true.
And I am not joking when I say that LGBT Pride programming is the primary export of America. It is not even debatable. It has displaced racial animus, which is the number two export.
All this is to say that accurately saying the government has been taken over by an entity hostile to the American people is nothing but a true observation. They have told you in every single way they could.
They've removed your monuments. They've controlled your speech. They have infected your schools. They have ruined your entertainment. They have now replaced the flag on the seat of the government. They have to tell you.
Take due notice thereof and govern yourself accordingly.
PS: As I say this, several meeting requests are dumped into my inbox for company sponsored Pride events.
If I speak out against those in public, I will be fired by my company and shunned from my industry.
If that does not fit your definition of conquered, what, exactly, does?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is why these people are interesting to listen to but ultimate unhelpful. They'll put Robert Kennedy in office who will be a rubber stamp for any bit of left wing legislation that lands on his desk.
An unsecured canoe is over his wife(?) and son's(?) head while he awkardly holds paddles over his daughter's(?) head in order to be distracted and confused as to why a more experienced man might have a rifle in the wilderness.
Interesting that the gun is pointed directly at the man's head, too.
Some guy was responding to me the other day that people took vacations and stuff while on single incomes and I'm like "my dad didn't stay in a hotel room until he was like 22."
Like, my dad drove an 83 Ford Ranger for 18 years that he purchased after after selling his 71 Ford LTD to his brother for $200. That's hundred. When my mom started working they bought a 77 Chevette for $350.
You can still raise a family of 5 on a single income but you have to hard conversation with yourself about what "comfortable" means.
"Analysis determined that the objects retrieved are “of exotic origin (non-human intelligence, whether extraterrestrial or unknown origin) based on the vehicle morphologies and material science testing and the possession of unique atomic arrangements and radiological signatures”
"Grusch provided Congress with hours of recorded classified information transcribed into hundreds of pages which included specific data about the materials recovery program. Congress has not been provided with any physical materials related to wreckage or other non-human objects"
And there is an interpretation of this song where you take the narrator at face value and he's still proud of being born in America despite having faced all the hardships he has because he saw what life in Vietnam was like.
Bruce could have left the music sad and somber like the demo and kept the name as Vietnam Blues. But he didn't, so he released a different song then he intended. The song says what it says and sounds like what it sounds like.
The danger of writing sarcasm is that eventually people will just take what you said at face value.
What does "some of those who work forces are the same who burn crosses" mean in 2023?