ProPublica Profile picture
Jun 13 31 tweets 10 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Underride crashes — when a passenger vehicle collides with a semi truck & slides beneath it — kill hundreds of Americans a year.
A ProPublica/FRONTLINE investigation reveals how safety regulators repeatedly failed to collect accurate data or take action to protect passengers. 🧵
2/ Concerns about underride crashes are not new.

In 1967, Hollywood star Jayne Mansfield was killed when the Buick she was riding in collided into the rear of a semi truck, crushing the top portion of the car.
propublica.org/article/underr… Black and white photo of th...
3/ At the time, large trucks were required to have rear guards meant to prevent these kinds of crashes, but standards were lax and many guards were made of low-grade metal that had a tendency to collapse when hit. propublica.org/article/underr…
4/ Within 2 years, the Dept. of Transportation had proposed new standards for rear guards that would be larger and stronger...

The trucking industry did not welcome this news.
5/ In a 1970 letter to the @USDOT, the American Trucking Associations complained about “the unfairness of inflicting upon the industry the heavy cost penalty which would be brought about by the incorporation of a guard of the proposed type.” Partial copy of document da...
6/ The Truck Trailer Manufacturers Association, a lobbying outfit representing semi-trailer builders, argued it would be “far more practical” to force Volkswagen and other companies making compact cars to produce larger vehicles that were less likely to slip beneath a truck. Screenshot of document. Hig...
7/ After pressure from industry lobbyists, the DOT scuttled the proposal because the safety benefits "would not be commensurate with the costs of implementing the proposed requirements.” Screenshot of federal recor...
8/ This cycle of safety regulators giving up after opposition from industry interests would repeat itself in the decades that followed.

Days before Ronald Reagan's 1981 inauguration, @NHTSAgov proposed a new rule for stronger rear guards that would only cost ~$50/vehicle...
9/ But the ATA and other industry lobbyists countered that the price would actually be $127/trailer and that the guards wouldn't save enough lives to justify the additional expense. Table titled "Comparis...
10/ Between industry pushback and the new Reagan administration's anti-regulation stance, rulemaking at NHTSA “came to a halt,” recalls Lou Lombardo, a physicist who was at the agency at the time. “We had nothing, nothing, nothing to do.”
11/ Asked if people died as a result of the agency’s failure to act on rear underride crashes, Lombardo had an instant reply: “Oh heck yes.”
12/ It wasn't until 1998 that a new federal standard for rear guards took effect, but it too was fraught with problems.

First, the regulation only applied to newly built semi-trailers. Older models with inadequate guards were grandfathered in.
13/ Second, NHTSA hadn't done enough testing in real-world conditions.

Time and again, the new guards failed, resulting in the severe underride crashes they were intended to prevent.
14/ Matt Brumbelow at @IIHS_autosafety — the place that crashes vehicles into stuff in the name of science — noticed this pattern.

By 2010, his team was crashing cars into trailers equipped with the new guards.

The results were dismal:
15/ Brumbelow's team also tested trailers equipped with stronger guards than the U.S. standard.

These guards fared better at stopping the oncoming vehicle:
16/ In the wake of the IIHS tests, many trailer companies voluntarily began building stronger guards. It would still be years before U.S. regulators acted.
17/ Underride crashes don't just happen at the rear of the truck.

Cars that collide with a semi-truck at an angle will get under the trailer's side where there are no federal standards for guards.

Not for lack of trying...
18/ Just like with the rear guards, regulators initially pushed for side guards on large trucks in the late 1960s, but quietly dropped the idea.

In 1991, NHTSA revisited the concept before deciding it was too costly. A more recent analysis, from 2023, came to the same conclusion
19/ Some truck manufacturers have claimed side guards would also add too much weight to trucks already burdened with cargo & that they'd actually make trucks more dangerous. However, a number of engineers have shown that effective, safe guards can be made for an affordable price.
20/ In arguing against stronger or additional guards, trucking industry lobbyists have repeatedly claimed that there either isn't enough data on fatalities or that the data shows not many lives would be saved.
21/ According to an analysis of NHTSA data, more than 400 people died in underride crashes in 2021.

But the true death toll is likely far higher.
22/ Part of the problem is that NHTSA relies on local & state police to investigate collisions and document their findings.

Those reports are sent to NHTSA and compiled into a single, mammoth database, cataloging tens of thousands of incidents every year.
23/ However, NHTSA has never required first responders to track underride crashes & has offered little training to police on the issue.

"Only 17 states have a field on their police accident reports to indicate if an underride occurred," says Harry Adler of @_SaferTrucking .
24/ A 2019 GAO report concluded that underride “fatalities are likely underreported,” and urged NHTSA to do a better job of educating police officers and other law enforcement personnel about the crashes.
propublica.org/article/underr…
25/ In 2022, more than a decade after Brumbelow began his crash tests, NHTSA updated its rules.

Even then, the agency acted only after the passage of a federal law directing it to do so.
26/ NHTSA officials & @SecretaryPete declined to be interviewed by ProPublica & @frontlinepbs.

NHTSA did not respond to written questions from the news organizations, including about why the agency had moved so slowly to address the lethal hazards posed by underride collisions.
27/ In a statement, NHTSA defended its record. “Safety is the top priority for the U.S. Department of Transportation and NHTSA,” the agency said.
28/ Dan Horvath, the ATA’s vice president for safety policy, said he has little information about the organization’s past positions, but he acknowledges that costs were “a very real factor” for the industry.
29/ He says the industry spends billions on safety each year. His organization still opposes any mandates for side guards.
30/ Read the ProPublica & @frontlinepbs investigation from @ACInvestigates @KartikayM @juliaingram_ here:

propublica.org/article/underr…
31/ And watch the full @frontlinepbs @propublica documentary, "America's Dangerous Trucks," premiering tonight at 10pm ET on @PBS
pbs.org/wgbh/frontline…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with ProPublica

ProPublica Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @propublica

Jun 3
A Chicago cop got out of 44 tickets by saying over and over that his girlfriend stole his car.

And it worked.

All 44 times, his tickets were dismissed. 👇🧵
2/ At ticket hearings, Jeffrey Kriv often provided what he said were legitimate police incident reports as evidence of the car thefts.

He explained that he got the reports at police HQ.

Kriv did not let on that he, himself, was a Chicago cop.

propublica.org/article/how-ch…
3/ While a cop, dozens of complaints about Kriv's conduct were related to fraud & dishonesty. Kriv denied many of the allegations & fought recommended punishments.

(28% of misconduct complaints against him were upheld, compared with 4% against all officers, going back decades)
Read 21 tweets
May 14
A few weeks before our investigation into HomeVestors of America came out, the “We Buy Ugly Houses” company’s leadership called an online meeting for its 1,100+ franchisees.

The purpose of that meeting: Teach franchisees how to push back on our story. 🧵👇👇
2/ “Our goal is to bury it,” HomeVestors CEO David Hicks said about ProPublica's investigation:
propublica.org/article/homeve…
3/ We acquired a full recording of the meeting.

In it, HomeVestors leadership alternates between accusing us of writing “attack articles” and praising the thoroughness of our reporting.

“It’s amazing what they have brought up,” Hicks said.
Read 13 tweets
May 13
HomeVestors, the company behind those "We Buy Ugly Houses" billboards, has a stated goal: Help homeowners out of "Ugly Situations."

But our investigation found HomeVestors franchisees that used deception & targeted America's most vulnerable. 🏘️🧵👇
2/ These tactics targeted the elderly, infirm and those so close to poverty that they feared homelessness would be a consequence of selling.

propublica.org/article/ugly-t…
3/ There are two sides of HomeVestors.

The public sees billboards, TV ads and postcards with “Ug,” a friendly caveman mascot. Sometimes he’s grinning and holding a bag of money. Photo of a billboard for Ho...
Read 19 tweets
May 10
Lee Mazurek had been on medication to keep his chronic disease at bay for nine years when a @Cigna employee flagged his case for review.

The company estimated it could save $98,000+ if he switched parts of his treatment plan. Then came the denial. 🧵👇👇
2/ At first, no one @Cigna told him about these calculations.

The only reason Mazurek found out: He used a little-known but very powerful tool to get a peek behind the scenes at the insurance company.

He requested his claim file.
propublica.org/article/find-o…
3/ What’s a claim file?

When a health insurance company denies your claim, it creates a file that can include all the notes, phone call audio and other correspondence involved in deciding whether to approve or deny your claim.
Read 13 tweets
May 5
In 2022, South Carolina's GOP-dominated legislature pushed through a redistricting plan that took a competitive district and made it solidly Republican.

They got a surprising boost from one of the country's biggest Democrats: Rep. James Clyburn. (THREAD) Photo of an expressway over...
2/ Clyburn, South Carolina’s most powerful Democrat, wanted a safe seat as state lawmakers began redrawing SC’s congressional districts:

His 6th district had suffered a big population drop. Photograph of Rep. James Cl...
3/ A Clyburn aide took a hand-drawn map to a secret meeting with GOP staffers who were drawing new congressional lines. Even though federal legislators have no direct role in redistricting, GOP leaders knew they couldn’t ignore Clyburn, the state’s highest-ranking Black official. A map with hand-drawn lines...
Read 12 tweets
May 4
More revelations on the financial ties between Clarence Thomas and billionaire pal Harlan Crow:

The GOP megadonor paid the private school tuition for a Thomas family member the Supreme Court justice raised "as a son."

And no, Thomas didn't disclose the payments. (THREAD) Photo collage including ima...
2/ Thomas took legal custody of his grand-nephew Mark Martin when the boy was 6.

In 2008, when Martin was a teen, Thomas sent him to Hidden Lake Academy, a private boarding school in the foothills of Northern Georgia where tuition cost in excess of $6K/month. Collage of images of Hidden...
3/ But Thomas didn't cover the bill. A bank statement for the school from July 2009, buried in unrelated court filings, shows the source of Martin’s tuition payment for that month: Harlan Crow's company.

propublica.org/article/claren… Photo of a United Community...
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(