TSCM Profile picture
Jun 13, 2023 16 tweets 7 min read Read on X
June 13, 2005.

"I ask all of you to wait to hear the truth before you label or condemn me—I'll be acquitted and vindicated when the truth is told." -MJ

More than 60 days of testimony. 3+ month trial. 33 hours of jury deliberations. A total vindication.

#MichaelJacksonInnocent Image
COUNT 1 - VERDICT:

We the Jury in the above-entitled case, find the Defendant [Michael Jackson] NOT GUILTY of Conspiracy as charged in Count One of the Indictment.

DATED: 13 June, 2005

SIGNED: Foreperson #80 Image
COUNT 2 - VERDICT:

We the Jury in the above-entitled case, find the Defendant [Michael Jackson] NOT GUILTY of a Lewd Act Upon a Minor Child as charged in Count Two of the Indictment.

DATED: 13 June, 2005

SIGNED: Foreperson #80 Image
COUNT 3 - VERDICT:

We the Jury in the above-entitled case, find the Defendant [Michael Jackson] NOT GUILTY of a Lewd Act Upon a Minor Child as charged in Count Three of the Indictment.

DATED: 13 June, 2005

SIGNED: Foreperson #80 Image
COUNT 4 - VERDICT:

We the Jury in the above-entitled case, find the Defendant [Michael Jackson] NOT GUILTY of a Lewd Act Upon a Minor Child as charged in Count Four of the Indictment.

DATED: 10 June, 2005

SIGNED: Foreperson #80 Image
COUNT 5 - VERDICT:

We the Jury in the above-entitled case, find the Defendant [Michael Jackson] NOT GUILTY of a Lewd Act Upon a Minor Child as charged in Count Five of the Indictment.

DATED: 10 June, 2005

SIGNED: Foreperson #80 Image
COUNT 6 - VERDICT:

We the Jury in the above-entitled case, find the Defendant [Michael Jackson] NOT GUILTY of Attempting to Commit a Lewd Act Upon a Minor Child as charged in Count Six of the Indictment.

DATED: 13 June, 2005

SIGNED: Foreperson #80 Image
COUNT 7A - VERDICT:

We the Jury in the above-entitled case, find the Defendant [Michael Jackson] NOT GUILTY of Administering an Intoxicating Agent to Assist in the Commission of a Felony as charged in Count Seven of the Indictment.

DATED: 13 June, 2005

SIGNED: Foreperson #80 Image
COUNT 7B - VERDICT:

We the Jury in the above-entitled case, find the Defendant NOT GUILTY of Providing Alcoholic Beverages to Persons Under the Age of 21, a lesser included offense of that charged in Count Seven of the Indictment.

DATED: 13 June, 2005

SIGNED: Foreperson #80 Image
COUNT 8A - VERDICT:

We the Jury in the above-entitled case, find the Defendant [Michael Jackson] NOT GUILTY of Administering an Intoxicating Agent to Assist in the Commission of a Felony as charged in Count Eight of the Indictment.

DATED: 13 June, 2005

SIGNED: Foreperson #80 Image
COUNT 8B - VERDICT:

We the Jury in the above-entitled case, find the Defendant NOT GUILTY of Providing Alcoholic Beverages to Persons Under the Age of 21, a lesser included offense of that charged in Count Eight of the Indictment.

DATED: 13 June, 2005

SIGNED: Foreperson #80 Image
COUNT 9A - VERDICT:

We the Jury in the above-entitled case, find the Defendant [Michael Jackson] NOT GUILTY of Administering an Intoxicating Agent to Assist in the Commission of a Felony as charged in Count Nine of the Indictment.

DATED: 10 June, 2005

SIGNED: Foreperson #80 Image
COUNT 9B - VERDICT:

We the Jury in the above-entitled case, find the Defendant NOT GUILTY of Providing Alcoholic Beverages to Persons Under the Age of 21, a lesser included offense of that charged in Count Nine of the Indictment.

DATED: 10 June, 2005

SIGNED: Foreperson #80 Image
COUNT 10A - VERDICT:

We the Jury in the above-entitled case, find the Defendant [Michael Jackson] NOT GUILTY of Administering an Intoxicating Agent to Assist in the Commission of a Felony as charged in Count Ten of the Indictment.

DATED: 10 June, 2005

SIGNED: Foreperson #80 Image
COUNT 10B - VERDICT:

We the Jury in the above-entitled case, find the Defendant NOT GUILTY of Providing Alcoholic Beverages to Persons Under the Age of 21, a lesser included offense of that charged in Count Ten of the Indictment.

DATED: 10 June, 2005

SIGNED: Foreperson #80 Image
"The media anticipated the legal equivalent of a lynching... To spike ratings, they covered the man, not the evidence... The end result was further blackballing of Michael Jackson's reputation." Peter Shaplen (Media Coordinator)

#MJInnocent

VICTORY DAY

Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with TSCM

TSCM Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MJJRepository

Sep 10
Today in 04, MJ's defense filed a motion calling out Melville's factual errors in refusing to reduce MJ's egregious $3M bail.

The county max for comparable charges was $435K.

Sneddon: "MJ is no ordinary defendant & the bail schedule does not apply to him."

"Celebrity justice." Image
In the ruling, Melville baselessly suggested MJ had plans to travel to Brazil after sending the Arvizo family there (via hot air balloon?)

Except MJ had no involvement in any of those conversations, nor did he plan to go there.

Melville quoted non-existent remarks in decision.
Image
Image
Further, Melville leveraged the Chandler and Francia civil settlements based on 10+ yr. old allegations that never spawned any criminal charges after grand juries, 400 witnesses and millions of tax-payer expended travels to find any "victims."

Melville never did reduce the bond. Image
Read 4 tweets
Aug 27
Summary of the motions last week:

GRANTED: Motion to quash subpoenas seeking body photos etc. This was the most important defense motion.

DENIED: Motion to enforce professional conduct by plaintiffs.

POSTPONED UNTIL OCT. 22 2024: Trial readiness & complex case considerations.
RE: Subpoenas

Judge Whitaker noted the prior unsuccessful requests made by Wade/James in 2014-18.

"To the extent Plaintiffs wished to seek relief from that order, they have not done so...subpoenas directly violate that order."

The one exception being the new request to SBCSO. Image
RE: Subpoenas

But the SBCSO subpoenas—the only new aspect introduced with Carpenter's latest requests—would still require a notice to affected consumers (including MJ's estate) and this was not done.

Therefore, these subpoena requests are included in quashing all four sets. 👍 Image
Read 7 tweets
Aug 21
The Wade/James court hearing tomorrow centers on three agenda items:

1. Trial readiness and tentative scheduling

2. Motion to enforce professional conduct by Wade's attorney(s)

3. Motion to quash four subpoenas to LAPD/SBSO/LADA/SBDA

The context behind each is as follows: Image
RE: Trial Readiness

The defense proposed a trial date of August 17, 2026 to allow 18 months for discovery, depositions, other calendar commitments and pre-trial motions. The plaintiffs did not object.

If honored, both sides will have until fall 2025 to finish major prep work. Image
Earlier this year, the media claimed the estate was delaying due to the biopic and to "silence" WR/JS and that Carpenter wanted a trial by April '25.

But in legal filings Carpenter agreed with the defense that discovery "is in infancy" and a 2026 trial date is fully reasonable.
Image
Image
Read 13 tweets
Jun 19
From the original 11-page handwritten memo of Jordan's allegations, sold to the media in '93.

"Jordan stated he & Evan met with MJ & attorneys, and confronted him with ALLEGATIONS in AN EFFORT TO MAKE A SETTLEMENT and AVOID A COURT HEARING."

They never wanted court of any kind. Image
This is the same meeting detailed in Ray/Evan's book, where they outright admit to demanding $20M and how, had MJ just paid Evan it, he could've remained unscathed.

Instead, MJ staunchly refused any such demand including Evan's subsequent $1M pleading he sought later that month. Image
On August 5, 1993 following the failed meeting:

"I would like you to continue to negotiate...if those negotiations are not successful then as your client I am instructing you to file a complaint against MJ"

(By that, Evan meant filing a CIVIL case against MJ to allege such 💰.) Image
Read 6 tweets
May 26
In Wade's suit he depicts himself as a superstar on an unmatched trajectory to fame & fortune if not for the realization of "abuse" in his 30s.

"It is not a question of whether Robson would have [continued to be] successful."

But he was already in major career decline by then. Image
By 2009, Wade openly admitted that he and his wife were depleting all of their time and money attempting to write failed short films and screenplays. Including the one filmed at NL.

"I spend most of my time saying no to jobs, probably to my own demise."


Image
In 2010, a student spent time with Wade and Amanda to interview them for a paper and oral narrative.

At that point Wade said he was already far removed from the entertainment industry and for years had been out of that career's spotlight, allegedly to avoid Hollywood burnout.
Image
Image
Read 16 tweets
May 10
Keller's opening in motion:

"Plaintiffs’ new counsel, John Carpenter, has a problem: no matter which way one cuts it, his clients are inveterate liars... Carpenter has taken to a new tack, to poison the jury pool by making numerous false and misleading statements to the press."
Image
In illustrating Carpenter's media rounds, she quotes his Daily Mail interview that the biopic "is normalizing very dangerous behavior—sure it will be used by padophiles."

Which is particularly ostensive, considering LN promoted extremely pro-pedophilia normalization throughout.
Image
Image
From Carpenter's TMZ interview, he suggested that the defense had access to "incriminating evidence" that they were not handing over.

Keller notes: "No such evidence was provided to Mr. Mesereau. No such evidence existed, and all responsive documents were already produced." Image
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(