Keller puts into writing what should had been obvious to everyone since 1993:

"The photos...were the result of a court-ordered search based on a false statement in what became a discredited criminal investigation."

The body search ruined state's case—evidenced by the following: 36 days elapsed from the body search on Dec. 20, 1993 until the time of the civil settlement on Jan. 25, 1994.

At no point in those 36 days did either DA (Garcetti/Sneddon) present the pics/affidavits/Jordan's recorded interview/officer testimony to the court as cause to arrest.

Once again TMZ distorts reality in it's guilt promo over the defense's motion to quash what is now the 3rd attempt since 2013 for the men to get MJ's body pics.

Back in 2013 LAPD itself had already declined the subpoena requests indicating they are exempt from public disclosure. Yes, the defense also filed a motion to quash these subpoenas as part of their own in-depth justifications as to why the request should be court-denied. Just as they did back in 2017-2018.

A hearing has been reserved for June 6 at 8:30 to discuss this motion with the judge.

Several noteworthy observations from Mesereau's "Complex Civil Case Questionnaire" filed this week.

The filing is to argue that these consolidated cases (Wade/James) have "all the hallmarks of a complex case," which is what Judge Whitaker suggested in the Feb. 28 status hearing. Tom estimates 65-75 witnesses for the consolidated civil trial.

By comparison, the 2005 criminal trial saw 144 witnesses from Feb. 28 to June. 3.

The estimate relates to the abuse timespans, complex causes alleged, 30-35+ year gap in making the claims, LN participation & more.

THREAD: Robson/Safechuck Case Status as of February 2024.

As part of the case management hearing this week, the plaintiffs (Wade/James) and defendants (MJJ Productions/MJJ Ventures) submitted written narratives outlining the current state of their cases and anticipated plans. The defense outlined the lengthy history of these matters, dating back to 2013 when Wade filed his estate claim (followed by James in 2014).

Since the men's claims were barred against the estate, they came up with a new theory to go after the companies for compensation instead.

Since the grotesque Dimond-sourced "Think Twice" podcast from a year ago has resurfaced as a featured free item on Apple, here is a repost of my 3-part thread outlining the deceit.

To date, neither host nor their "fact checkers" have addressed any of it.

https://twitter.com/MJJRepository/status/1662590948864409600

When a podcast insists it is not there to convince people of MJ's guilt or innocence, then spends hours regurgitating paid tabloid stories that Dimond further embellishes—without once acknowledging how these claims were demonstrably false under oath—it is purely gaslighting.

THREAD: This should be the mindset of every logical human on the planet:

It's my opinion that men who have repeatedly, undisputedly lied about material facts of their claims both inside & outside of court should not be dignified with a 12TH chance at a "not about money" 🤑 case. Wade claiming in his sworn declaration 10+ YEARS AGO that he had no knowledge of the estate until 2013—purely to circumvent the statutes—whereas 7 undisputed facts proved he had knowledge of it no later than 2011, was not an action done in good faith by a truth-focused person.

June 13, 2005.

"I ask all of you to wait to hear the truth before you label or condemn me—I'll be acquitted and vindicated when the truth is told." -MJ

More than 60 days of testimony. 3+ month trial. 33 hours of jury deliberations. A total vindication.

#MichaelJacksonInnocent COUNT 1 - VERDICT:

We the Jury in the above-entitled case, find the Defendant [Michael Jackson] NOT GUILTY of Conspiracy as charged in Count One of the Indictment.

DATED: 13 June, 2005

SIGNED: Foreperson #80

THREAD: After a disastrous gloss-over of material facts and blatant falsification of others in the Chandler scandal—including the use of Dimond and Francia as defacto sources—did the pay-for podcast fair any better when detailing the Arvizo case?

(Spoiler: Not in the slightest.) It opens by excerpting the overplayed soundbite from LWMJ with Gavin, cutting it just as all the media did in 2003-2005 before MJ and Gavin both confirm MJ slept on the floor.

Also omitting how another adult slept in the room, and the complete context.

THREAD: By ep. 2 of the last podcast cash-in, it becomes evident that every producer and purported fact-checker involved should be forever stripped of any journalistic credence they previously claimed to possess.

Blind promotion of knowingly false propaganda by Dimond & Francia. For context—Dimond was physically at court during Blanca's train wreck testimony. As usual, she exited during CROSS to give Nancy Grace updates.

For this podcast, the hosts & Dimond and Smith collectively omit any mention of Blanca's testimony, sticking only to Hard Copy claims.

THREAD: Breaking down the deception present in the kickoff topic alone, within the latest opportunistic podcast.

Cohosted by Leon Neyfakh & Jay Smooth, many support staff & two self-described fact checkers—none of whom seem willing to engage in debate versus blocking and muting. It takes all of 5 minutes into the 519 minute podcast—the latest cross media cash-in to exploit MJ's name in promotion of premium services—to recognize their blatant slant and all the fallacies of neutrality.

Launching it with an omissive portrayal of MJ's 1994 NAACP appearance.

In the @NYtimes special, @LizDDay includes bits from Blanca's depo.

But conveniently cuts it right before the moment Blanca says it was never Pellicano harassing, threatening or following her.

Blanca in fact names @NYtimes as the ones pursuing her. Why not include this bit Liz? Later @LizDay adds vagueness to the briefcase story, making viewers believe Gary went to "one of MJ's properties" for briefcase without making it clear this was the property that had already been raided.

She omits Hearne explaining it was visible to LEO and seen in photos at GJ.

WADE APPEALS UPDATE:

Lily Chandler (JC's younger sister) & Tabitha Marks (JC's ex) have requested the same extension as estate to file their response (Oct. 3).

Yes. These two non-parties are—FOR THE 6TH YEAR—still forced to argue Finaldi's repeatedly rejected motions for depo. Despite Finaldi implying he'd not compel anyone to be deposed, his continued actions prove otherwise.

Lily explained in 2016 she had no recollection of interacting w/ MJ and had never witnessed any sexual abuse.

Tabitha didn't know JC until '08 and has no relevance to timeline.

WADE AND JAMES APPEALS UPDATES:

The court will be consolidating both cases for oral arguments (as they did in 2019) and has proposed consolidating both cases for a single final opinion as well.

Estate now has until October 3 to reply to Wade's brief, but may request more time. The consolidation of cases for a single ruling is controversial and was opposed by estate the last time.

This is because each case is very unique even though Finaldi pretends they are identical (and with same causes of action).

Wade's was summary judgment, James' was demurrer.

ARCHIVES: Janet Arvizo's "Please Don't Judge Me!" Trial Reenactment

When Janet took the stand, her responses became uncomfortable pleadings to the jury (to the extent that even Zonen had to object).

Here's Janet acting out the absurd tale of MJ repeatedly licking Gavin's hair. Amid the media stories about this narrative (which circulated widely from the Grand Jury leaks) Stacy Brown & Bob Jones attempted to work it into their sensational book about Jordan, too.

But under oath Bob Jones denied ever seeing such an incident at all under any circumstance.

The first public, at-length interview with @IAmBrettBarnes since 93. Brett is pivotal in affirming MJ's innocence on this 17th annual #VindicationDay.

Brett's scenario is consistent with all others who never sought fame and/or profit by knowing MJ.

Brett is the guilter dilemma.

https://twitter.com/TheMJCast/status/1536229825324601344

@IAmBrettBarnes A full 10 months after the Chandler investigation began—in the very final month of the last extended grand jury—Sneddon was so desperate to still conjure any actual evidence or victim that he (& Weis, Birchim, Monk, Hodgman) traveled in secret to AU just hoping Brett would turn.

THREAD: Estate's response to Safechuck's appeal.

The estate filed a 70-page reply to Finaldi's brief.

Remember, this is an appellate matter so their arguments are purely procedural as matter of law (taking allegations at face value), to explain why court was correct to dismiss. As a refresher, James' 3rd amended suit against MJJ Productions & MJJ Ventures sought compensation for 6 causes of action.

Oct. 2020: Judge found none of the causes were viable. Finaldi failed to convince that it could be remedied. All 6 were dismissed on demurrer.

JS appealed.

I'll always remind people how Kimmel hired an actor to pretend he was a delusional MJ fan from 2004-05 to appear at all the court events, unbeknownst to the media who were happy to showcase this "fan."

Associated Press also ran this fake character's photo for stories on June 13.

https://twitter.com/MJInnocentUK/status/1488902045633593346

So a lot of the falsified media persona of fans being blinded by stardom and uncaring if MJ was actually an abuser or not stems directly from stunts like this, where stooge "fans" blend in with real ones and become the highlights of what the media wants to depict "fandom" as.

THREAD: Estate's Reply to Finaldi's Opposition of Case Reimbursement Costs

Context: In June the estate filed a memorandum of costs seeking up to $112,960 reimbursement from Finaldi after Wade's case was tossed.

Finaldi objected to many of the expenses, the estate has responded. The estate argues "Robson's motion to tax costs is w/out merit."

The court's prior ruling that knocked some costs off the total was made by a temporary judge sitting in for Beckloff, and is not a binding order.

They note how Wade's last appeal was only successful due to AB-218.

ARCHIVES: Classic Larry Feldman.

2004, after Janet's police interview clips leak to the media: " What we have today is a judicial process that doesn't protect victims when they make charges against superstars."

1993: AP directly names Feldman as leaker of Jordan's affidavit. Yes, the same Larry Feldman who cried "the privacy of the accuser has already been violated" about Arvizos, was the one who directly violated the privacy of Jordan in 1993 by leaking the most confidential and personal details of his allegations to the massively syndicated AP.

THREAD: Here is a run-down of Safechuck's attempted arguments in the latest appeal.

Finaldi's team filed a late 71-page opening brief alleging that "the trial court AGAIN wrongfully dismissed the action."

This is in reference to JS' full case—6 causes—being dismissed last Oct. Sidenote to Dan and all guilters who still attempt to half-heartedly defend James' impossible train station abuse lie as "the date they have wrong is the end of the abuse."

Just as with JS' affidavit and all briefs, the appellate opens by confirming "until age of 14 in 1992."

The guilter proof (from latest incarnation of the troll who blocks & stalks) that MJ was investigated prior to 93, comes not from a pre-93 filing but from the word of Hard Copy favorite Charles Mathews—Dec. '93, while representing the Hayvenhurst 5 in their tossed lawsuit.

😆🤣 The same attorney who alleged MJ's mafia broke into his office to snap photos of case files.

Then cried attempted murder after a random motorcycle accident.

Judge found he used injuries to avoid pretrial hearings & delay proceedings, yet still made time to appear on Hard Copy!