MarkHertling Profile picture
Jun 13 12 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
A former President is being indicted - for the 2d time - & there's non-stop coverage.

Some good analysis, some not so good.

Many keep bringing up how "those in the military are likely the most upset about Trump absconding with intel secrets."

Yes, but there's more. 1/
Having read the indictment (4x's now), the amount & type of classified information Trump took, hid, did not secure, and refused to give back is, IMHO, gobsmacking.

Many analysts have called them "war plans." I doubt any documents fit into that specific contingency category. 2/
The documents were likely extremely detailed intelligence assessments, w/ potential foe (& friendly) capabilities & weaknesses & US capabilities we would not want anyone - especially foes - to know.

Many have said, this isn't a document issue it's a national security issue. 3/
I have seen intel agencies, military units, foreign service officers put sweat & blood into providing these documents, making sure they are accurate.

All those individuals KNOW they must get it right, because their work, their assessments, are provided to key decision-makers. 4/
Those who view these docs - the President, high-level military leaders, State Dept officials & others - use these assessments for critical decision making. FOR our citizens, FOR our country.

One phrase in the indictment struck me like a bullet.

Trump saying: "my boxes." 5/
None of these are "personal papers." These documents provide information/intelligence - gathered through the use of US capabilities, put together by really smart, dedicated, patriotic individuals - to be used by US officials to defend against all enemies, foreign & domestic. 6/
Strategic leaders see and use these documents when they are in a position to serve the American people.

They don't get to keep them, or review them, or show them around, or not keep them secure, when they are no longer in the position. 7/
As a military leader in command of different organizations, I "used" each kind of the type of documents found in the trove at MAL.

Each kind: Secret, Top Secret, TS-SCI, TS-HCI, NOFORM, TK, even the kinds of ones that were "redactted" (mostly likely various code word). 8/
I was ONLY allowed to see them because they helped me make better decisions, plans, or conduct more effective operations. When I left the military or a specific job, I was "read out" of the clearance.

That's what happens to everyone, including the President. 9/
Yes, the President has declassification authority.

But that requires a process that then protects a LOT of people. Anyone who says otherwise is a moron.

And anyone who says someone can do it after leaving their leadership role is even more moronic. 10/
There's a reason I reacted viscerally to the "my papers" statement.

To claim they are "his" - as if they've been given to him for personal use or vanity just like the WWE belt, the NY Post clippings, or any other trinket or memento found in these boxes - is horrid. 11/
Yes, military & intel officials are pissed. They know the power of these documents that were treated cavalierly.

All Americans should be equally pissed. But it seems many are not because of how some in government are treating this case.

We need to treat this seriously. 12/12

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with MarkHertling

MarkHertling Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MarkHertling

Jun 9
This photo tweeted by @RALee85 shows Bradley’s and Leo II’s damaged (obvious thrown tracks, apparent mine damage). This is part of combat.
It also speaks to the need for trained maintenance teams to conduct rapid BDAR (battle damage assessment and repair) on high-tech kit 1/
This is the kind of thing I’ve been tweeting about for months. The training of the logisticians, mechanics, repair teams who have established supply chains & available parts
.
There’s even a manual for BDAR (attached). 2/

armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/…
There WILL be damaged (& some destroyed) western equipment on the offensive battlefield…from direct hits, mine strikes, or even just the “track slap” that comes with heavy track vehicles going over rough terrain.

Things break - a lot - in combat. 3/
Read 8 tweets
Jun 8
This is a 🧵on @cnni
I'm very glad that my friend & (sorta) colleague @KateBolduan commented on what's going on at CNN.

Might I provide a personal story? Here goes.
1/
My first contact with @CNN was in 2003, in Baghdad.

I was the assistant division commander of @1stArmoredDiv. One of my duties was "working with the press" (assigned to me by the Division Commander)

During combat, a "stringer" -an Iraqi reporter working for CNN - was killed. 2/
A CNN reporters - @janearraf - asked if I could escort a visiting exec - @EasonJordan - from the Baghdad airport to their bureau. It would speed him and keep him safe along the "highway of death."

I said yes. I met Eason, threw him in my HMMWV, then took him downtown. 3/ Image
Read 17 tweets
Jun 7
Against my better judgement, I thought I would engage @TrentTelenko on his 🧵, to perhaps defend some of those - as he says - are throwing "horses**t against the wall."

Here's a shorter 🧵 suggesting some things that Trent (& others) may not be considering. 1/
First, I'd like to compliment the Telenko family - especially his father - for service during a critical time in our Army. I was a young LT/CPT during that transformational period & saw some of the things Trent mentions when I commanded platoons, companies, & served as an S3. 2/
Most of the run-up Trent gets right.

Cost cap & capabilities guidance for the original M1 is correct. In both cases, cost grew & requirements changed (like they always do).

Also, the M1 grew out of 10+ yrs of the MBT-70 program w/ W. Germany. 3/
Read 17 tweets
Jun 6
The failure or destruction of the #NovaKakhovka dam will cause significant humanitarian issues and it will certainly affect the execution of Ukraine's offense & Russian defensive operations.

UKR has stated they anticipated this potential disaster. 1/5

cnn.com/europe/live-ne…
As a great commander, I suspect Gen Zaluzhny had incorporated this possibility as one of his planning factors for the offensive.

As Multinational Division-North Commander in Iraq in 2007-8, we also had a dam

The Mosul ("Saddam") Dam on the Tigris. 2/

link.springer.com/article/10.100…
Generating hydroelectric power & irrigation for most of the Kurdish and northern Iraqi provinces, it was considered the most poorly constructed dam in the world.

Like the NK Dam in Ukraine, it had about 11.1 km3 of water, and it's destruction would have been catastrophic. 3/
Read 5 tweets
Jun 4
Any commander will make an assessment of their force and the enemy’s force.

There are “indicators” as to what will be outcomes when the two meet.

One area I always watch: Overt show of confidence…in people, leaders, equipment, plan. Not cockiness or swagger, confidence. 1/12
The “hush” video posted by Ukraine is a reflection of this.

No bragging, no bluster, no indicators of what is happening…just a nuanced “we’re ready, and we’re about to go.”

You never underestimate your enemy, but you must be confident in your potential. 2/
Compare that to what’s happening on the Russian side, today:
-more messaging by Prigozhin about dysfunction in RU govt & military
-Russian mutineers killing commander before deserting
-anti-Putin militias continue attack in Shebekino & beyond 3/

nytimes.com/2023/06/03/wor…
Read 13 tweets
May 31
This was a small part of a very enjoyable conversation with @IAPonomarenko.

The article is a good description of the challenges with fielding, maintaining & integrating the M1-series of tanks (and some other equipment).

Ilia didn’t mention how the conversation started. 1/15
In opening, I stated I’ve never been opposed to providing any type of equipment to Ukraine, but rather I’ve attempted to outline the availability, logistics, training, immediate use, national security aspect & cost (political & fiscal) challenges of each item. 2/
Each nation has their own way of war, and the methods, approaches, equipment, training & doctrine are trained & refined over decades by the armies of those nations.

When a nation goes to war, the training, systems, equipment, processes & doctrine kicks in. 3/
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(