2. Standard Chartered (StanChart) in Zim was a solid bank making good money. In 2016 StanChart made $13 Million in profit and was the 3rd largest bank by deposits in Zimbabwe.
3. Compared to StanChart Globally, however, the Zim operation was still a “small fish"
StanChart Zim Revenue = $55.02 Million
StanChart Group Revenue = $14.06 Billion
StanChart Zim Size = 0.4%
The good thing was in 2016 the small fish had limited drama & was profitable.
4. When you are a small fish in a big pond not attracting unwanted attention is very important.
That is what StandChart Zim did from 2016 - 2018.
They did not really feature in the StanChart Group Annual report & when they did it was for good news -they had won an award👏🏾
5. In 2019, however, that changed. Zimbabwe was suddenly called out in the annual report because it had contributed to the increase of Credit Grade 12 Balances😤 (which is really bad see why in the next tweet).
6. Credit Grade 12 is the worst rating aside from defaulting.
Think of that friend who never pays anyone back - Credit Grade 12.
Zim being called out despite being only 0.4% of the business was a bad sign.
This wasn't necessarily local management's fault however...
7. ...These downgrade issues were probably linked to the reintroduction of the Zim Dollar in Feb 2019.
Whatever the case, the small fish had started to pollute the water in the pond and attract attention,
8. The following year, 2020, Zim was again in the group's annual report. This time because of a decrease in Credit RWA driven by the depreciation of ZWD against the US Dollar.
Whilst not technically always a bad thing it was clear that Zim was on the radar due to currency risks.
9. In 2021, Zim showed up again more related to COVID.
Considering StanChart is in 59 Countries, it's interesting how Zim ended up as one of the examples - attracting attention again.
Why does being mentioned in the annual report matter? See the next tweet...
10. The annual report is the most important document a public company releases yearly. The CEO, CFO, Directors etc spend 100s hours reviewing it.
A small operation should not keep popping up with anything but good news.
Otherwise, Execs start asking why are we in that market.
11. Unsurprisingly in 2022 the decision was announced. StanChart would be exiting 7 markets including Zimbabwe to focus on the "most significant opportunities for growth" (i.e. bigger fish that swim nicely)
The small fish was getting kicked out of the pond.
12. The exit was completed last week with FBC acquiring 100% of Standard Chartered. Another international company bowing out of Zim.
The same applies to most Global companies when small markets become a headache - the effort is not worth the return and so they rather exit.
13. In conclusion, if you are a small market like Zim, to prevent foreign companies from existing - you need to be stable, & predictable, & not take management's attention.
This is not easy in Zim & so other companies may still follow.
What do you think? Comment & Retweet👏🏾
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In Zimbabwe, banking does not exist in the typical sense.
In most cases, you have payment processors, custodians, and property companies.
The following visual displays the banks in Zimbabwe with the largest investment property holdings, along with a comparison of select banks in South Africa.
To recap, an investment property is a property held for capital growth and/or earning rental income.
ZB Financial Holdings (ZB) has the biggest investment property portfolio at $137 million. However, this is also because it owns Mashonaland Holdings, which is actually a property company with $93 million in investment property. However, even after that is taken out, ZB still has investment property worth over $40 million.
Part of the reason CBZ wanted to buy ZB was actually due to its property portfolio. Newzwire quoted the CBZ CEO as saying.
"Our main attraction is not really banking, but the other business units, which is your insurance, which is your property.”
To show how significant Zimbabwean banking groups' investment property holdings are, the chart also includes the combined holdings of select South African banking groups for comparison.
If you add up the investment properties held by ABSA, the First Rand Group (comprising FNB, Wesbank, and RMB), and Capitec, the total comes to $62 million, which is less than the individual holdings of Stanbic, FBC, and ZB.
This visual shows the proportion of total loan balances held in personal lending (loans to individuals) compared to other classes of lending, such as business lending.
In other words, the chart highlights which banks lend the most money to people rather than corporations and other institutions.
The outlier is First Capital Bank at 51%, which we covered this week and highlighted this ratio as a potential driver of its strong performance.
The low ratio of Steward Bank at 8% is surprising. Historically, Steward Bank was positioned to become a leading retail bank through its partnership with EcoCash and Econet, even enabling customers to open a bank account on their phone in just 60 seconds.
I would have thought they would have a stronger presence in retail lending as well, but it doesn't seem to have been the case, as at their year-end, 29 February 2025.
Perhaps this is a temporary situation, as Steward Bank is in the process of transitioning after being acquired by TN Group and rebranding as TN CyberTech Bank, with the ambition of becoming a Neo-Bank (a digital-only bank that operates primarily through mobile apps and websites.)
Another interesting data point to look at is the lending rates for individuals compared to those for corporates.
Based on the RBZ data from August, the average weighted interest rates for banks when lending to individuals ranged from 13.49% to 17.59%, and for businesses, from 10.27% to 15.80%.
The image below also seems to highlight another advantage.
You make more money on loans lending to individuals than lending to corporates.
First Capital Bank's Financial Results: A Zimbabwean Bank Making Money From Loans, Not Charges?
As EcoCash, Mukuru and Innbucks eye new opportunities, could First Capital's approach be the blueprint?
An argument could be made that in Zimbabwe, banking does not exist in the typical sense.
Instead, what you have are payment processors and custodians.
Proof of this is the fact that the banking sector generated only 10.4% of its income from interest income, which is typically the core of a bank's activities.
First Capital Bank, however, is an exception in that it still generates 46% of its income from interest income from loans and advances. Given the context, this percentage is actually quite high.
But what is more intresting is who First Capital is lending to.
This fact indicates potential market gaps that companies like Mukuru, Innbuck or even Ecocash could take advantage of.
Let’s unpack!
First Capital Zimbabwe’s Performance
Based on their most recent results for the half-year ended June 30, 2025, First Capital reported a strong start, with a 13% year-over-year increase in net income.
This growth was driven by a big jump in net interest income, which rose 32%.
Notably, the income wasn't driven by gains on the revaluation of investment property, which has been a significant source of “income” for other banks in the past.
For First Capital, this was real operational income, not just accounting adjustments.
Operating expenses decreased slightly from the previous year, and considering the 13% income growth, this represents a significant improvement.
This resulted in a cost-to-income ratio of 48% and an improvement from 55% in 2024. Generally, a cost-to-income ratio of less than 50% is considered favourable. It basically means it costs you 50 cents to make a dollar of income.
Why Starlink is the Best Thing To Happen to Econet.
Econet has one major risk, and it's not competition from Starlink.
Let's Unpack!
Starlink isn't a direct threat to the mobile business; in fact, since Starlink's launch, Econet's income from data revenue has increased by 36%, which is the same rate it was growing the year before.
So there hasn't been any meaningful slowdown.
As unpacked before, Econet's business model is they "Borrow" money to "Build" their network (think base stations) and then "Sell" access to that network, and with the income they "Service" (pay back) the Loans and then "Borrow" more to continue the cycle.
1/11 In its latest report, the Insurance and Pensions Commission revealed that pension funds have once again marked up the value of their property portfolios — even as rental yields slipped to just 3.7%.
At the same time, the very companies that contribute to these pension
funds and rent space from them have increased their overdue payments by 37%.
How much longer can property valuations keep rising?
Let's Unpack!
2/11 About the Insurance and Pensions Commission (IPEC)
IPEC regulates Zimbabwe’s largest institutional investors — pension funds and insurance companies, which together hold and deploy the biggest pools of long-term capital in the economy.
Because of the above, IPEC reports can show you what is happening and what might happen next in the entire economy.
This month, IPEC released their 2025 Q1 Pension report.
3/11 Are Property Prices in Zimbabwe Getting Too High?
There are logical reasons why property prices in Zimbabwe appear to be so high.
We covered that in detail before on Money & Moves.
However, some data points raise questions about whether cracks are starting to emerge in valuations.
In the latest report, total assets increased by 10%.
However, a lot of that growth was driven by revaluation gains, including those from fair value adjustments to “investment properties.”