auonsson Profile picture
Jun 14, 2023 32 tweets 7 min read Read on X
Swedish prosecutor on Nord Stream:

"We know quite well what happened, how it was done, what equipment and type of large ship that presupposes. Explosives are unique. We can close some leads and confirm other leads. Hypothesis on state actor involvement is strengthening." Image
When asked about the Andromeda-lead (pro-Ukrainian group in sailboat) prosecutor Ljungquist gets very vague, confirms cooperation in some parts with German investigation but declines further comment.
State prosecutor Mats Ljungqvist said this in todays episode of "Gräns", radio show on national security on Swedish public service radio.

Full transcript in last tweets.

Full audio here.
sverigesradio.se/avsnitt/spelet…
Other tidbits from the show the includes:

A military teacher and previous combat diver questions the feasability of using a small sail boat, but believes it was a small group, for op sec reasons.
Phd of communication, specialized in RU media states how the general view in Russian regime-media is that the US/anglosaxians are behind the sabotage.

"The Ukraine-hypothesis is considered unserious. Russian media claims UA does not have competence, experience nor resources"
What i describe above is only part of the 29 minutes of content.

In coming tweets I have transcribed quotes by state prosecutor Mats Ljungqvist. In swedish.
"Analyserna av de beslag som har tagits upp från havsbotten och analyserna av vad som skett på platsen är i det närmaste klara. Det betyder ju också att vi utifrån det har en ganska god uppfattning om vad som har hänt och hur det här har gått till."
"Jag kan ju säga så mycket som att det där sprängämnet har en speciell sammansättning som det är möjligt att dra vissa slutsater ifrån."
"Utifrån vetskap om hur den här attacken bör ha gått till så säger det också någonting om hur utrustningen kan ha sett. Det vill säga vilken typ av utrustning, fartyg med mera som behövdes för att kunna genomföra det här. cont...
Det betyder ju att vi utifrån det både kan avföra vissa spår men också då på andra sät bekräfta andra delar."
Reporter nämner statlig aktör bakom.
"Ja, jag skulle vilja säga när det gäller den frågan så tycker jag snarast att den hypotesen har stärkts under resans gång. Men varför jag kan påstå det kan jag för närvarande inte säga någonting cont....
om för att det är en del av utredningen som är sekretessbelagd."
Reporter frågar om Andromeda-spår:
"Ja..., vi arbetar ju tillsammans med tyskarna, så mycket kan jag väl säga."
"Och jag har själv träffat den tyska åklagaren och den tyska utredningen tillsammans med min utredning. Men, mer än så kan jag kan inte säga. Vi arbetar tillsammans med det här ärendet just nu."
"Jag vill inte kommentera vad utredningen handlar om i grunden och jag vill inte heller kommentera den tyska utredningen, eeehh, av olika skäl. Jag kommenterar bara att vi jobbar tillsammans med tyskarna i delar och det är väl, ehm, så mycket man kan säga om det just nu."
My take: the words by prosecutor Ljungquist is about as vague on good grounds as yesterday's story pointing at Ukraine is concrete on loose grounds.
The difference: yesterdays story lacks public sources and a reasonable explanation (sail boat is not).
Todays story is from a named state representative, claiming that they can and will explain how.
The choice of words and avoidance of questions are also telling. Prosecutor Ljungquist uses the word "fartyg", see bing-search-pic for examples.
Further he confirms a state actor is the strong lead.
And he is very hesistant when asked about German investigation. Image
My guess: it is hard to comment when your German colleagues are barking up a dumb tree.
Most of you have never sailed on a sailboat. I'd like to continue this thread and try and illustrate the reality of "sail boat in the Baltics end of September 2022"

While the Baltics basically is a lake it is not that small, the wind is howling in Sep and waves are short period.
This is the wind speeds of Kökar Bogskär 18-28 Sep 2022. Location is not perfect, but close enough.

As you can see there was no storm, but plenty of wind. Image
In September South Baltics historically see waves of 3-8 meter maximum. I have not found exact stats for the period, but 10-20 m/s will produce significant waves.

helcom.fi/wp-content/upl…
So, what does this mean on a sailboat?

Let me illustrate it with this lady. She is preparing a baguette in calm conditions on a 40-foot sailboat. Boat is moving, which makes it more stable than than a stationary one.

Thanks youtube.com/@RyanSophieSai… for video. Heavily cut down.
Remember, the video above shows much better conditions than what a crew on Andromeda would have to endure in Sep 2022 outside Bornholm.

The conditions for Andromeda would be closer to what you see in this video
They would be handling hundreds (possibly tons?) of kg explosives, advanced heavy divers equipment etc.

Did you see the baguette fly? Replace with heavy equipment or explosives and you get the idea.
All the while trying to keep stationary in a boat that is not able to do so.

No, they can not anchor. They would need hundreds of meter of anchor chain, too much for the boat.

To get it up or down would require handling 80 m continually. 80 m of 8mm chain weighs about 150 kg.
Add the anchor, another 10-30 kg. Would you lift 175 kg of iron while your boat moves up and down in relation to anchor+chain 2-8 meter for each wave that passes? In the dark?
Without anchor? You could drive around maybe. Hoping you find your divers in between the waves.
And then the divers shall disembark a sailboat moving 2-8 meters up and down. With a bomb of x hundreds of kg.

Going up? Aim for the flimsy bathplatform moving 2-8 m in relation to your head. Embark on a ladder designed for sunbathing in flat seas. Easy peasy. Image
Any investigator who claims that the 50 foot sail boat Andromeda was the vessel central to the Nord Stream sabotage ops would have to explain away all of the above.

Maybe, maybe it could be used to ferry staff to a proper work boat, but even that would be sketchy in 10-20 m/s.
And yes, the German investigators are "certain" according to Spiegel. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Nord… Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with auonsson

auonsson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @auonsson

Aug 22
Stockholm-Helsinki ferry SILJA SERENADE made a sharp turn for unknown reasons night between Tu & We. Owner claims weather and collision avoidance. There were damages to loose items.

But there was no other ship on AIS, no sharp turn registered and weather was calm. Image
Calm weather is substantiated by an anonymous maritime professional witness to YLE.

Heavy jamming? Malfunctions? Dark ship in the way? Submarine? Possible explanations are many but the one from the ferry company seem unfinished.

Tnx @akihheikkinen!

yle.fi/a/74-20178772Image
Image
Image
@akihheikkinen Possibly related: last week American special forces exercised close to another ferry on the route.

alandstidningen.ax/nyheter/okanda…

businessinsider.com/swccs-operate-…
Read 5 tweets
Jul 15
Russian destroyer Vice Admiral Kulakov fended of a drone threat Monday in Fehmarn Belt, Baltic Sea, Danish EEZ.

The large ship made evasive maneuvers, employed some anti-drone machine and manned and aimed lighter guns.

All according to local news: archive.is/G5kotImage
DK Navy observed. Thanks anon follower.
As the Russian destroyer made high speed maneuvers with machine guns ready to fire she was surrounded by both commercial and leisure ship traffic.

In her immediate vicinity at most likely incident time were two large tankers and at least 5 sail boats. A few miles of Denmark.
Read 4 tweets
Jul 2
Swedish maritime authority just posted maybe their most extensive interference warning to date.

Even radar is now seeing interference, besides more familiar GNSS, AIS and DGPS.

Radar is the single most important navigational aid on ships, particularly in cases of lost GPS/GNSS. Image
Source:

And on the NAVTEX terminals. navvarn.sjofartsverket.se/Navigationsvar…Image
Read 5 tweets
Jun 29
South Baltic sea is experiencing a newish type of GNSS-jamming. It is affecting units at sea level far and wide, much further than one ground based jammer can reach.

The most intense attack so far took place as the political elite of Denmark and 100k visitors met at Bornholm.
Data for animation above is the signal levels that RINEX stations receive from various GNSS-constellations.
Last year a limited span of frequencies were affected. 2025 all frequencies/bands are affected. BeiDou, not illustrated (noisy).

The Bornholm station is used as example. Image
Image
Looking per station we can see the geographic and temporal reach.

South-east corner of Baltic is affected (but not all stations!) and with an intensified period right now.

It is also evident that the ongoing 2025 attacks result in a much more degraded signal to noise ratio. Image
Image
Read 12 tweets
Feb 15
There is an estimated 1 in 10k-100k years chance that all 8 of the Nov 2024 - Jan 2025 Baltic Sea cable breaks are coincidental.
Data is hard to get by but no matter which real data or reasonable assumption one picks it is very unlikely all 8 of them are explained by chance.
🧵 Image
Illustration of a 1 in 108 908 years chance that all 8 of the Nov 2024 - Jan 2025 Baltic Sea cable breaks happens with present background levels. Above is 1 in 10 609 years illustrated. Image
Two alternative ways of illustrating the extremely low probability of the Baltic Cable breaks being normal. Red dots in each, promise! Image
Image
Read 15 tweets
Jan 19
Washington Post has again managed to find anon sources saying Russia is not doing bad things in the Baltic Sea.

They got the infographic quite wrong, so I fixed it.

They also have a named source, within mil intel, completely contradicting their headline.

Nice one WaPo! Image
Image
Washington Post today presented a wholly incomplete infographics on Baltic Sea infrastructure incidents.

Actually damaged structures: 13, presented by WaPo as 4-5.

Actual # incidents: 4, WaPo found 3.

Here is the fix. Image
According to WaPo and their anons "there is an emerging consensus that it is all accidents"

Yet officials in actual positions are ordering very expensive and resource intensive mission as we speak.

Article archived: archive.is/7JcKG
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(