Joeri Rogelj Profile picture
Jun 14, 2023 23 tweets 11 min read Read on X
Today, the @esabcc_eu published its advice for the @EU_Commission's #2040ClimateTarget proposal and accompanying #GreenhouseGasEmissionsBudget

Interested in how the advice was developed?
Here’s a slightly longer explainer of the underlying report

🧵

climate-advisory-board.europa.eu/reports-and-pu…
1/n
The Advisory Board recommends the EU to take up a 2040 emissions reduction target of 90–95% compared to 1990 to keep the EU’s GHG budget to within 11 to 14 Gt CO2e between 2030 and 2050. #2040ClimateTarget #GreenhouseGasEmissionsBudget

Where do these numbers come from?

2/n
To arrive at this #2040ClimateTarget advice, the @esabcc_eu implemented its earlier recommendation to the @EU_Commission to follow an approach that is systematic, transparent and guided by EU values, when preparing its EU 2040 climate target proposal. 4/n
The initial advice on the #2040ClimateTarget was published earlier this year in January 2023. 5/n
climate-advisory-board.europa.eu/reports-and-pu…
The most recent #2040ClimateTarget advice is based on two central considerations:

1) estimates of what the EU’s fair contribution to a global 1.5°C pathway would be, and

2) considerations of the feasibility of deep GHG emission reductions by 2040.

We look at both in turn 6/n
The advice quantifies different perspectives on the EU’s fair share of emissions, but bases these quantifications on ethical principles that the EU has expressed and emphasized in its laws and commitments.

These include the EU’s commitment to pursue keeping warming to 1.5C 7/n Image
equity provisions under the Paris Agreement 8/n Image
as well as principles explicitly cited in the 2021 European Climate Law.

For example, the ‘polluter pays’ principle. 9/n Image
The implications of these principles are then quantified.

Choices of how to capture these ethical principles with specific indicators result in a range of estimates consistent with the initial ethical principles expressed by the EU. 10/n Image
At the same time, socioeconomic and technological pathways for the EU are assessed to understand how deeply emissions can be reduced by 2040. 11/n
Here, the @esabcc_eu issued a call for evidence to the wider scientific community.
This call resulted in the submission of over 1000 scenarios by the community 12/n
climate-advisory-board.europa.eu/news/call-for-…
These scenarios were subsequently assessed on:
- Whether they represent the EU and its targets to a useful degree
- Whether they imply key feasibility concerns identified in the scientific literature
- The environmental risks and technological challenges they would imply 13/n Image
The insights of the feasibility and fair share perspectives were then combined to arrive at the recommendation to take up a #2040ClimateTarget of 90–95% compared to 1990 to keep the EU’s GHG budget to within 11 to 14 Gt CO2e between 2030 and 2050. 14/n Image
Note that this 2030–2050 #GreenhouseGasEmissionsBudget includes emissions from international aviation and maritime transport between EU destinations. 15/n Image
The advice also highlights three ‘iconic pathways’ that illustrate different choices and strategies to achieve climate neutrality in 2050. 16/n Image
Selected for the diverse mitigation strategies they implement, the iconic pathways have very diverse assumptions and rely in different degrees on specific mitigation measures. 17/n Image
These represent fundamental choices to be considered during the implementation of a 90–95% reduction by 2040. 18/n ImageImageImage
The @esabcc_eu advice acknowledges that there is a shortfall between what the EU can achieve domestically and the GHG budget derived from a fair share analysis based on the ethical principles expressed in EU or international law. 19/n Image
To minimize this shortfall, the advice recommends aiming for the more ambitious end of the 90–95% range, while combining this with action outside the EU. 20/n Image
It even provides a few more specific suggestions for dealing with the shortfall in the underlying report. 21/n ImageImage
The advice relies on several, more detailed considerations and I can’t discuss everything here. The full report is best place to explore if you’re interested in understanding all details. 22/n
climate-advisory-board.europa.eu/reports-and-pu…
The drafting of this advice was an engaging, stimulating and careful process with invaluable contributions of all @esabcc_eu members and incredible support by the Advisory Board's secretariat. 23/n
climate-advisory-board.europa.eu/about/advisory…
To conclude, my personal hope for the @esabcc_eu #2040ClimateTarget advice is that it can be a constructive scientific input into the 2040 target proposal by the @EU_Commission.

It represents our best available scientific understanding of what is both needed and possible. /end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Joeri Rogelj

Joeri Rogelj Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JoeriRogelj

Jun 4
With every year passing global warming progresses. 🌍🔥

@IPCC_CH reports provide the most authoritative climate assessments but only in 5-7 year intervals.

To fill this gap over 50 scientist annually update key indicators of global climate change.

Latest update out now, a🧵
In 2021, the @IPCC_CH climate report assessed the state of the climate system and the “unequivocal” role of humans in changing it.
Since then, CO2 emissions and global warming have continued and up-to-date and trustworthy climate information is more important than ever A graphic showing a map of land, including imagery of boats, a farm, an aeroplane, a factory and a city in the centre with 3 rectangle text boxes below it. White title reads: Why do we need the Indicators of Global Climate Change? The text boxes read: The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports on climate system indicators every 5-10 years, Given how rapidly the climate system is changing and the need for governments and policymakers to make decisions informed by the latest science to avoid the worst impacts is more vital than ever, This group of scientists has come togethe...
50 international scientists are filling this gap and have now published their second annual Indicators of Global Climate Change (IGCC) report, providing updates on how human activity is impacting the climate system. A graphic showing a map of land, including imagery of boats, a farm, an aeroplane, a factory and a city in the centre with 4 rectangle text boxes below it. White title reads: What are the Indicators of Global Climate Change? The text boxes read: An annual peer-reviewed update of key climate indicators (with globe icon), developed by an international team of over 50 scientists (3 people icon), built on established Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) methodologies (open book icon), full paper is available at Earth System Science Data (ESSD) (paperwork icon).
Read 11 tweets
Dec 5, 2023
Breaking news on #CO2 📢🔥🌍
The new @gcarbonproject emissions numbers are out with an analysis by @CarbonBrief

What do the numbers tell us?
Spoiler alert: they are quite the party pooper for prospects of global peaking 🥳💩😢 (1)
Global CO2 emissions from fossil fuels and the production of cement increased yet another 1.1% since 2022, reaching their highest level yet.
36.8 billion tons of CO2 in 2023!

Total CO2 emissions that include land use increased by ca. 0.5%, a tie with the 2019 record (2) Image
Any positive news here?
Land-use CO2 emissions have been declining slightly, but not at a pace that would be consistent with pathways meeting the Paris Agreement 1.5C ambition.
And their estimates are still accompanied by large scientific uncertainty. (3) Image
Read 8 tweets
Dec 4, 2023
Two quotes by two scientists have caused a bit of confusion. 👇

I am one of them.
So let me explain what I'm referring to here. (1) @KarlMathiesen
The latest @IPCC_CH mitigation report shows different ways in which warming can be kept to (close to) 1.5°C.
See the light-blue range in the figure below which shows global GHG emissions. (2) Image
Emissions also decline for carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) individually, but to different levels. Only CO2 reaches net zero and goes net negative. (3)
Image
Image
Read 18 tweets
Nov 14, 2023
Hot off the press - new climate research 🚨🌍🔥
Will warming stop once we reach net zero CO2 emissions?

Open-access publication @FrontiersIn assessing what we know and don't know about whether warming will stop once net zero CO2 emissions are reached. /1
frontiersin.org/journals/scien…
With #NetZero targets established as key components of international and national climate policy, it becomes ever more pertinent to closely understand what reaching net-zero emissions will deliver and what it doesn't. /2

iopscience.iop.org/article/10.108…
That's why we, with an international team of scientists, take a deep look at the 'zero emissions commitment' or ZEC. In other words, how much warming (or cooling) can be expected once global emissions are brought down to zero.

For various reasons, we focus our effort on CO2. /3
Read 18 tweets
Jun 14, 2023
In 2021, the European Climate Law created the European Scientific Advisory Board on Climate Change @esabcc_eu and tasked it to inform the EU’s #2040ClimateTarget and 2030-2050 greenhouse gas (GHG) budget.

Today, @esabcc_eu published its advice.
Here’s the short version 🧵1/n Image
The Advisory Board recommends the @EU_Commission to take up:

a 2040 emissions reduction target of 90–95% compared to 1990

to keep the EU’s GHG budget to within 11 to 14 Gt CO2e between 2030 and 2050.
2/n
This advice is based on an assessment of what would be both a fair and a feasible emissions reduction contribution of the EU to the global challenge of keeping warming to 1.5°C. 3/n
Read 7 tweets
Oct 27, 2022
Where are global emissions heading and where should they be going to keep #globalwarming well below 2C and 1.5C?

Today, @UNEP released the 2022 #emissionsgap report.

A look at the key messages

but caution, not much good news ahead 🧵/1
Countries’ new and updated pledges (NDCs) submitted since COP26 reduce projected global GHG emissions in 2030 by only 0.5 gigatons of CO2 equivalent (GtCO2e) compared with projections based on pledges at the time of COP26.
Some pledges result in even higher emissions /2
Countries are off track to achieve even the globally highly insufficient NDCs. Global GHG emissions in 2030 based on current policies are estimated at 58 GtCO2e. The implementation gap in 2030 between policies and NDCs is about 3 to 6 GtCO2e. /3
Read 24 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(