(1/18) Today, instead of a specific technical feature, I'd like to talk about the modernised T-64BVs that the Ukrainians currently use.
(2/18) These tanks are popularly known as 'T-64BV zrazka 2017 roku' ('T-64BV mod. 2017'), but I have not seen any evidence this is an official military designation.
(3/18) In general, the Soviet, Russian, and Ukrainian militaries did not use 'model year' designations. This is something that enthusiasts/historians came up with to distinguish modifications implemented in different production years. e.g. both of these are just T-72B in manuals.
(4/18) Prior to the Donbas War, the primary Ukrainian T-64 modernisation effort was the BM Bulat (Object 447AM1).
In many ways, the BM Bulat is to the T-64BV what the T-80U is to the T-80BV. Indeed, it was at one point known as the 'T-64U' (below).
(5/18) It primarily concentrates on improving the 'hard stats' of the T-64, like the traditional firepower/mobility/armour triad (new FCS, new engine, new armour), and was the most modern tank available to the ZSU in reasonable numbers in 2014.
(6/18) Unfortunately, the Bulat did not prove an unqualified success, and Sergey Buryak of the Ivan Chernyakhovsky National University of Defense of Ukraine noted some of its drawbacks.
(7/18) Combat experience from the Donbas War led to a reevaluation of priorities for Ukrainian tanks and armour in general. They are outlined in Prof. Vadym Slyusar's presentation at the 2020 Intl. Armoured Vehicles Conference:
(8/18) This is reflected in the modernised T-64BV. The first significant upgrade to situational awareness was the addition of a thermal sight in the form of Trimen's TPN1 TPV.
(9/18) The TPN1 TPV is based on the hopelessly obsolete TPN1 night vision sight (shown), but with the electro-optical converter inside taken out and replaced with a thermal imaging matrix. It can therefore fit into existing sight housings for the TPN1.
(10/18) It operates in conjunction with the regular 1G42 day sight, and is rated effective out to 4 km.
(11/18) Thermal optics have many advantages over passive night vision, especially in conditions where smoke or dust may obscure the latter. They also do not require illumination, which the old TPN1 needs to see beyond about 400 m.
(12/18) In addition to the thermal sight, the ancient R-123M/R-173 radios were first replaced by a Libid K-2RB radio. The Libid is a licence-built Motorola MOTOTRBO DM4600 series two-way radio.
(13/18) Regardless, the Lybid was a reasonably modern encrypted VHF/UHF radio set with some anti-jamming features such as frequency hopping. However, later L3Harris radios such as the Falcon III, regarded as more secure, began replacing the Lybid.
(15/18) This allows for more accurate navigation using GPS or GLONASS. It is also able to function as part of a battlefield management system alongside the Libid/L3Harris radios, as Buryak notes, but details are lacking.
(16/18) An attempt was also made to upgrade the protection, using Nizh shaped charge array ERA configured to fit inside existing Kontakt-1 boxes.
I will not talk about Nizh here, as it would require an entire thread of its own.
(17/18) Other than these upgrades, most of the other changes are quality-of-life changes for the crew, such as stepladders for easier crew access. The engine and transmission remain unchanged, same for the gun. @AndreiBtvt has a good walkaround:
(18/18) In summary, the modernised T-64BV is really more of an economical upgrade for the large T-64 fleet to implement the priorities the Ukrainians felt needed addressing after the Donbas War.
Time will tell if they made the right choices.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
BTL-1 was designed in 1970 by the Malyshev factory's train design dept (Malyshev did more than just build T-64s) for service in the Far East against the Chinese. The concept is based on some German WW2 Panzerzüge with tanks fighting from flatcars.
In this video, they are using early production T-54s with rear overhang turrets (the so-called '1947/1949 models'), but essentially any tank (or Shilkas etc.) could be put on it as desired.
As originally designed, Malva used the gun and breech assembly of the Msta-S, complete with the semi-automatic loading system for charges and projectiles. Some used Msta-B barrels without the fume extractor.
Msta-B has a different breech design and ramming system, thus can be excluded at least based on the breech.
(1) If you have been kind enough to buy/download/borrow/acquire/pirate one of these books, I would like to take this opportunity to list any technical errors I made in them. If future editions are printed, they will be corrected, and if you notice any more feel free to tell me.
(2) Vol. 4 Page 4: The T-44 was not the first Soviet tank with planetary gear transmission: they originally still used friction clutches like the T-34. The T-54 was the first, and T-44s were later given them when upgraded to T-44M standard in the '60s.
(3) Vol. 4 Page 31: T-72s are not unique in this respect. All the Soviet MBTs of that generation have this layout (T-64B, upper), even the T-80U (lower). Don't ask me why they put it there (maybe no space?).