Thread by @donwill94062871

The tale of 3 Trump cases.
It basically comes down to the same issue. Trump didnt listen to the 'approved' experts
In the MAL case he chose to listen to @TomFitton on the PRA. Why? Bc JW has the only court opinion on the PRA. The approved experts disagree thus 'obstruction'

Btw. Knowing this is what happened, how Fitton described his GJ appearance makes sense now. The SC lawyers spent a lot of time debating him on the Clinton sock drawer case. He said it was like being on a MSNBC panel.

In the J6 case, he chose to listen to Eastman who cited the Constitution which says the State Legislatures control elections and had the right to review, investigate and certify contested electors. Hawaii 1960 legal precedent. The 'approved' experts disagreed. Thus 'sedition'

We dont know for sure, so I am guessing about the GA case. The latest we learned is that Trump commissioned 2 'expert' reports which told him there was no 'widespread fraud'. He chose to listen to his GA legal team led by @CletaMitchell that had the best case in the nation.

The case didnt receive a timely court date (contrary to GA law)
He called Brad to discuss the data in the case. His team was working w/ public data available from the SOS office. Brad told them their data was in error. But would not provide them evidence of how it was in error.

Trump didnt trust 'expert' Brad either. He also didnt trust 'expert' Barr who said no fraud. We learned later that he didnt investigate anything and actually shut investigations down- see US Atty in PA and Tony Shafer on the USPS and @JeffClarkUS at DOJ

They are hinting at RICO and wire fraud in GA. Because he 'knew' according to 'experts' what he was claiming was false. I say he didnt believe them.

Notice the pattern here?

Beltway approved 'experts' vs outsiders
Administrative state vs voters.

They had to take him out

They knew what a 2nd term would bring. Schedule F.
The death knell for the administrative state.
He is the biggest threat to their survival.
End/