I didn’t become a Google Domains customer to be handed over to Squarespace who will move me to another product and then bombard me to build a Squarespace site.
Cannot believe Google screwed me, as a customer, again.
I’m sorry but I’ve been burnt by so many things by Google as a customer:
1. Google App Engine, 2011 (lesson: never use Google cloud services again)
2. Nest, ~2019 (lesson: never buy home products from G again)
3. Domains, 2023 (lesson: never buy hosting / domains from G again)
Whats really short-sighted about this move:
These millions of Google Domains customers were techical. Many of them either now or the future decision makers on what cloud solution to choose. GCP? AWS? Azure?
Well, now they all learn what NOT to choose: Google #businessstrategy
Also: as a Google Domains customer, why am hearing about this news from Squarespace’s press release?
Google (my provider, and where I’m a customer) has not told me this is happening.
I assume same with the other 10M impacted domains’ owners.
You don’t need to be a prophet to predict that Google Sites won’t be alive for much longer in the wake of this news. I would not onboard to it: and choose any other vendor instead.
Google is getting itself into this loop where people assume it will kill products - b/c it does!
Interesting to see a swarm of startups that raised VC seed funding to build a thin wrapper around ChatGPT.
While doing so would look like a fair bootstrapped product: I do wonder, where is the venture scale in this? Aka the opportunity to grow into a ~$100M ARR business.
Being a wrapper around ChatGPT is a risk for two reasons:
1. If the use case is truly profitable, OpenAI could just build and sell it themselves, with the next, better version of ChatGPT. They'll see and monitor high-growth use cases.
2. Trivial for a competitor to copy.
Fair observation that for a larger VC fund, making eg 50-100 small investments could be just a way to hedge, and see if 1 or 2 of the group will take off. High-risk, high-reward.
The real winner seems to be ChatGPT where a lot of the funding ends up at!
Every time I say how I don’t trust GCP as infra thanks to having been burnt very, very bad in 2011 as an early Google App Engine customer (when Google showed all their early adopters the middle finger) people from Google assure me a lot has changed in 12 years.
Has it?
As context, Railway is an infra platform where you can provision infrastructure, develop with that infrastructure locally, and then deploy to the cloud. Growing rapidly. They type of “golden goose” customer thanks to ever-growing spend.
One silent revolution happening that I don't hear much about:
Cloud-based development environments.
A game changer for companies that have this, and can set it up with a few clicks. Allows engineers to change between stacks *with ease* and opens up cross-domain collaboration.
It makes a huge difference for
1. Onboarding
2. Having the same development experience
3. (Ideally) Speed of development
4. Platform teams to measure what things are slowing engineers down
Something that did not exist a few years ago. Now even tools like VS Code support it.
Local dev environments work just fine for small teams/companies.
But get above a certain size, and it is *always* a hue pain to:
1. Onboard a new engineer to a stack/team
2. How that dev can setup another stack (eg another BE service in another repo)
In the year from September 2021 to Sep 2022, Shopify's stock fell by 79%. This hurt a lot the compensation of employees with stock-heavy packages.
Shopify then introduced Flex Comp, where people could choose how to allocate between cash and equity. What happened next (cont'd)
What happened next is people could decide how much of their compensation target to split between cash and equity, with this tool.
At the time, most people I talked with opted for all cash (or as much as they could). So how did the stock perform since? (cont'd)
Well, the stock has done exceptionally well since that point. Easy to look back: but those who allocated more stock definitely saw better outcomes... at least until now.
It’s disappointing when a company with transparency at its core, and integrity and kindness as values conducts layoffs in an obscure way: employees learning about this from Twitter DMs.
HashiCorp just let go 8%. Investors listening to earnings heard it before most employees.
I am helping out a few people let go by sharing bits and pieces I heard about severance: as HashiCorp has not communicated this in writing.
None of this would be surprising for a company that is known to not be transparent.
For HashiCorp: how this is done goes against values.
Unfortunately, cuts done are not surprising, given the economic outlook of companies.
But ~12 months after mass layoffs have started, there’s little excuse to leave employees in the dark on what is happening, and why.