Interestingly, when the Japanese Ramayan was being made, Vishwa Hindu Parishad opposed it, saying No Foreigner can portray the character of Lord Ram properly.
While we all can agree that it turned out to be terms of emotions and compassion it portrayed.
Today, when I recall this incident in the aftermath of Adipurush Debacle, I wonder what our history and scriptures are reduced to.
P.S. the scene above is one of my all time favourites, Neo Hinduvadis can troll us all they want for following Kshatriya Code of Ethics during Wars,
But we are proud of it, and shall forever be.
Whenever India's unbiased history will be written, this will be a differentiating factor between us and the rest.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
आजकल दौर चल रहा है इतिहास विकृतिकरण और राजतान्त्रिक महापुरुषो पर सवाल खडे़ करने का। हम सभी ऐसे अनेक प्रकरणो से परिचित है आज हम इसके समाधान पर बात करते है|
सर्वप्रथम तो क्षत्रिय इतिहास को केवल युद्धो तक सीमित करके ही इतिहासकारो ने न्याय नही किया।
आधे इतिहासकारों ने भी यदि युद्धों से इतर अन्य दृष्टिकोण भी अपनाया होता तो आज इतिहास की स्थिति अलग होती।
क्षत्रिय समाज के असल योगदान की विवेचना के लिए युद्धों से इतर इतिहास के कुछ अन्य आयामों पर इतिहास लेखन की आवश्यकता है, उदाहरणार्थ -
1) क्षत्रिय समाज के वंचितों से संबंध -
राजपूतों ने बहुजनो को कभी अछूत नही समझा। इसके विपरीत दलितों व क्षत्रियों के आपसी सौहार्द के अनेक उदाहरण इतिहास में मौजूद है।
जैसे पोकरण के रामदेव जी तंवर द्वारा डालीबाई मेघवाल को धर्म बहन बनाना व दोनो द्वारा साथ में समाजसुधार के कार्य करना।
Panipat was a battle led by Abdali against Mughals, Marathas being protectors of Mughal throne had a natural obligation to fight, why will anyone else fight for Mughal cause?
Yet, more than 6,000 Rajputs fought against Abdali in #Panipat,for their people.
All they know is to accuse others of their own shortcomings.
Rajputs never called you traitor for sitting ideal in Battles of Tarain, Bayana, Khanwa, Thanesar, Lahore, if we use same logic what will you be called for sitting ideal for 1000 years?
Panipat was fought during the 5th invasion of Ahmed Shah Abdali in India, he invaded India twice after Panipat, if Marathas were really fighting for the nation why didn't they fight against Abdali in any other invasion before and after Panipat?
#PrithvirajReview:
A loose attempt to establish Prithviraj as a Feminazzi who gives half of his time fighting to establish Sanyogita a part of his Darbar, making her sit beside him to listen to public complaints. Such virtue signalling was never a part of Kshatriya traditions.
//