Read on Twitter
There is a difference in saying SV40 promoters are not carcinogenic because they are missing the T-antigen …
And saying
We don’t know what will happen regarding genome integration.. or what will happen to the substantial part of the population already infected with SV40 virus.
And saying
We don’t know what will happen regarding genome integration.. or what will happen to the substantial part of the population already infected with SV40 virus.
A non trivial amount of the population already has SV40 virus capable of making the T antigen.
Injecting SV40 promoters and the SV40 origin into these patients may have unintended consequences.
Injecting SV40 promoters and the SV40 origin into these patients may have unintended consequences.
Saying something doesn’t cause cancer and saying we don’t know are very different statements the fact checkers don’t like to face.
I go back to Keith Pedens work at the FDA looking at genome integration risks and oncogenesis.
While there isn’t direct evidence yet…
I go back to Keith Pedens work at the FDA looking at genome integration risks and oncogenesis.
While there isn’t direct evidence yet…
Saying never seems to ignore the reason we have these dsDNA limits in the first place.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
