How to write your paper's research methods section

(without your choices seeming arbitrary to reviewers)
Writing Methods is where most people start their paper.

The goal:

Provide sufficient information for reviewers to assess the study's validity.

The explanation should be crystal clear, precise, and leave no room for confusion about how and why the experiment was conducted.
For example, a method section includes:

• Research design (in empirical research)
• Sample size and population
• The experimental protocol
• Data collection methods
• Data analysis methods
• Ethical considerations

Content only differs slightly across disciplines.
Start with a captivating intro paragraph.

It sets the stage for your research approach & design.

It gives readers a map of research process & results.

It provides decision-making context &
shows how results were achieved.

Detail:

• Objective
• Purpose
• Context
Introduce your research participants or data sources.

Share how you recruited participants or collected data.

Highlight key demographic details & sample size (power).

Discuss any inclusion or exclusion criteria.

Defend why your participants or data are perfect for your study.
Explain your research materials in detail.

Primary & secondary measures.
Include your survey or interview questions.
Quality of procedures, treatments, & variables.
Discuss the validity & reliability of your instruments.

Elaborate on how you piloted or tested them.

Redoable.
For each instrument used, report measures of the following:

Reliability:
• How consistently the method measures something
* Internal or test-retest method consistency

Validity:
• How precisely the method measures something
• Focus on construct validity or criterion validity
Everything that follows is procedure

• Data collection methods
• Research design (e.g., experimental, correlational, or descriptive)
• Data processing & diagnostics (e.g., outlier removal)
• Data analysis strategy (e.g., comparison or regression tests)
Let's dive into your research design.

In the world of experimental variables, we have

• Independent
• Dependent
• Confounding 🙀

An independent variable changes a dependent variable.

Confounding variables influence the dependent variable

but not the independent variable.
Report procedural details:

• How you assigned participants to different conditions

→ Randomization (blocks, stratified, clusters),
Latin Square...

• Instructions given to the participants in each group
• Interventions for each group
• The setting & length of each session
Hey, while you're reading this:

Don't miss out on free tips in my writing newsletter & take my online course about academic writing, where you learn everything you must know to write an academic paper.

Sign up for my completely free newsletter here now:
view.flodesk.com/pages/6438556c…
Explain your analysis.

Discuss how you prepared, coded, analyzed, and verified the data.

Mention any software or tools used.

Break it down:

Explain those statistical tests,
including hypothesis testing.

Justify why they matter.

Address the bias & errors you controlled for.
Briefly state limitations & ethical considerations.

Expose the flaws:
• What could cripple your methodology and skew the results?

Ethical ground check:
• Did you secure informed consent and ethics review board approval?

Address any confidentiality issues.
Summarize your methodology:

Restate briefly your

• approach
• data sources
• collection tools
• analysis procedures

Highlight the meticulous, systematic way you conducted the research.

Remember, it's all in the details that enable others to replicate it.
And that wraps up thread 16 out of 30 threads I'm doing in June.

Thanks for coming along for this ride.

Some more information can be found in this paper:

Kallet, R. H. (2004). How to write the methods section of a research paper. Respiratory care, 49(10), 1229-1232.
Thank you for reading my thread.

If you found this helpful:

1. Please share it with a friend who can benefit from it

2. Follow me @acagamic for more of this good stuff

And do check out my free newsletter if nothing else 🫶

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD | Academic Writing

Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD | Academic Writing Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @acagamic

Jun 17
Stop agonizing over how to say things in your paper.

Use templates to summarize, paraphrase, & quote.

Write more efficiently with these 6 templates ↓
1. Capture Author Action: Summaries & Paraphrasing

Summarize & paraphrase like a pro with these target phrases:

• X observes that
• X argues that
• X believes that
• X questions whether
• X claims that
• X concedes that
• X demonstrates that
• X emphasizes that
2. Quotations

Alert your readers.

These target phrases signal a direct quote is coming up.

• X asserts
• X stated that
• X argues in her book that
• In the journal ABC, X expresses dissatisfaction with
• X's disagreement is evident in her writing, where she states that
Read 10 tweets
Jun 16
No need to use ChatGPT *smartly* as a personal writing assistant

when there are so many other choices for academics out there.

Here are some of my favourite AI writing tools

(for academics) ↓
Ok, before I throw shade on ChatGPT, there are ways to make it work for academics.

And it is not free(+).

Use a plugin called ScholarAI.

You can ask it to provide articles about a topic & it does just that.

So far, I haven't had any errors, but always double-check accuracy.
But this doesn't cure writer's block.

If you're staring at a blank page, then tools like GPT-4 or Claude+ can help (via poe dot com).

I use Notion AI (a version of Claude) first to outline

or brainstorm ideas on a topic.

Then, I expand upon the subtopics.
Read 12 tweets
Jun 15
I have 29k+ citations to 300+ published papers.

I started by struggling with how to narrow down a research problem

(without any guidance from my PhD supervisor).

Here's how you frame a research problem statement

(in 5 super simple steps + examples) ↓
1. Highlight the gap in existing research on your topic

• Focus your audience on unexplored research
• This shows readers why your research question needs exploration

✅ Ask yourself what areas of your topic existing research hasn't addressed yet.

❗️State that clearly.
Example:

"Despite the growing interest in and the critical role of inclusive design in human-computer interaction, there is a lack of studies on the user experience of people with colour blindness. This often overlooked area in the field provides the impetus for our research."
Read 15 tweets
Jun 14
Close reading is a brutal superpower.

It isn't just reading.

Learn it, and you will become a rock-solid academic writer. ↓
The goal of academic writing is to make an original contribution.

Close reading identifies originality beyond the surface.

Arguments may be true but not good.

Because they're just obvious.

Good goes beyond obvious.
Close reading can be done of:

• social phenomena
• historical events
• quantitative data

It uncovers the author's interpretation of the evidence.

No evidence without analysis.

And in analysis lies interpretation

The search for meaning and significance of data.
Read 11 tweets
Jun 13
Stop talking about literature reviews like they're all the same.

48+ distinct review types exist across 7 broad groups.

Still no consensus.

Here are the 7 broad categories of literature reviews ↓
1. Traditional review

• multi-faceted approach
• clear process description
• uses study-shaped sampling
• increasing use of diverse literature sources

Systematic bibliographic database searches.
Methods like grey literature analysis or hand searching are discretionary.
2. Systematic Review

Rigorous process:

• Exhaustive search
• Minimum standards
• Scouring bibliographic databases

Up a notch:

• Reference list checks
• Expert outreach
• Citation searches
• Manual scanning
• Web

Gold standard:
Cochrane, Campbell Collab, HTAI, PRISMA.
Read 19 tweets
Jun 12
My h-index is 56.

I started by quitting my PhD.

If I had to start over today learning academic writing, here are the 7 crucial elements I would learn first

(they appear in all academic writing) ↓
1. Embrace Evidence

Academic writing relies on evidence.

Facts, information, logic are not enough.

Strong evidence supports your idea across disciplines.

It gives credibility to your work & empirical proof of abstract ideas.

❗️Your paper must show evidence for your claims.
2. Arrange Analysis

No evidence without analysis.

Disciplinary beliefs, motives, commitments, and customs affect your analysis.

Your proof adds fresh perspectives to your field's conversation.

❗️Interpret, analyze, and contextualize evidence within your field's framework.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(